Game 52 Scoring Chances: Coyotes Take Two Big Points
The Stars continued their recent trend of getting outchanced by a severe margin against teams they're fighting with for the final Western Conference playoff spot last night in the 4-1 loss to the Coyotes. After the loss the Stars sit 11th in the West. The Stars are still only two points out of the 8th seed, but don't look now. They're only nine points out of 29th also. It's highly unlikely that the Stars will fall that far, but it won't take many more efforts like we saw last night for them to drop further out of playoff position.
With two big points on the line the Stars allowed the Coyotes to outchance them 17-6. The Coyotes built their lead after the first period, but they laid the groundwork for the eventual 4-1 win by coming out strong in the first. They outchanced the Stars 8-1 in the first, and 9-5 for the remainder of the game.
| Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 6 | 17 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The issues that arose from the game are numerous. The defense and offense were both poor. The even strength picture was even worse than the overall picture given that two of the Stars six chances came on the powerplay. Jamie Benn had his worst game of the season, and the Stars appear to be coming apart at the seams. After the jump we'll look at one bright spot that popped up late, a terrible goal, and the player charts from the game.
Throughout most of the game the Stars looked completely out of synch in both zones. The zone the Stars run defensively doesn't appear to work. When the attacking team keeps their skates moving it generally doesn't take much to find breakdowns in the zone to create easy offense. Below is an example of the problem from last night. This is the scene right before Radim Vrbata put the Coyotes ahead 2-1.
I may have taken this with my phone...don't let that distract you.
Trevor Daley is in front of the net covering a Coyote. Loui Eriksson is at the left point covering a Coyote. That's a good start. Nicklas Grossman and Eric Nystrom are standing in the slot doing...something?. I guess. They aren't protecting for a cross crease pass because there are no Coyotes behind them, or even threatening to get behind them. The gap control just seems to stink which allows the right point and two forwards for the Coyotes set up a passing drill around one of the Stars worst defensive forwards (Ribeiro) while two guys stand in the slot doing the equivalent of nothing.
The point man passed to the forward in the high slot (presumably Nystrom's responsibility) who then passed down low to the forward on the boards to pick up 40 prime feet uncontested. It's too easy. That isn't NHL caliber defense. They play a zone, but that doesn't mean stand in one place. They have to pressure the puck carrier at some point. They have to be positioned better. Breakdowns like this can't happen as often as they do.
| # | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
| 2 | N. GROSSMAN | 15:02 | 0 | 3 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:39 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | S. ROBIDAS | 16:07 | 2 | 7 | 4:43 | 1 | 0 | 1:21 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | T. DALEY | 15:30 | 0 | 4 | 2:21 | 1 | 0 | 0:39 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | A. GOLIGOSKI | 20:01 | 2 | 6 | 3:49 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | P. LARSEN | 18:47 | 2 | 6 | 2:16 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | S. SOURAY | 16:25 | 2 | 6 | 0:59 | 0 | 0 | 1:21 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | J. BENN | 15:16 | 2 | 7 | 2:56 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | A. BURISH | 13:24 | 1 | 6 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | T. PETERSEN | 5:58 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | R. DVORAK | 13:54 | 0 | 6 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 1:21 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | L. ERIKSSON | 15:31 | 2 | 4 | 4:08 | 1 | 0 | 0:39 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | T. WANDELL | 7:14 | 0 | 1 | 0:57 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | E. NYSTROM | 13:16 | 2 | 2 | 1:19 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | S. OTT | 15:27 | 1 | 7 | 3:54 | 2 | 0 | 0:39 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | V. FIDDLER | 13:43 | 0 | 6 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | M. RIBEIRO | 15:31 | 2 | 2 | 3:10 | 0 | 0 | 1:21 | 0 | 1 |
| 73 | M. RYDER | 15:04 | 2 | 4 | 4:48 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 81 | T. VINCOUR | 8:30 | 0 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
Despite the defensive breakdown pictured above, the Ribeiro line was the Stars top line. Ribeiro 0, Nystrom 0, and Eriksson -2 were the top unit overall. They didn't have much in either end, but compared to the rest of the lineup they were elite. Benn picked a poor time for his worst game of the season. He and Steve Ott were -5 and -6 even strength chances. The third line (from which Tomas Vincour was banished) were exceptionally poor also. Vernon Fiddler, Radek Dvorak, and Adam Burish were -6, -6, and -5.
Part of the reason for the ridiculous negatives is the play of the defense. No pairing fared well last night. The top defender was Grossman at -3. The Alex Goligoski/Philip Larsen pair continues to be a defensive liability after being on the ice for six chances against, but they managed to come in second in the fail race. Stephane Robidas and Sheldon Souray were both on the ice for seven chances against. The moral of this story is that no one escapes blame for a game so poor.
| Team | Period | Time | Note | DAL | Opponent | |||||||||||
| PHX | 1 | 19:40 | Hanzal | 3 | 14 | 29 | 32 | 44 | 73 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 15:18 | Yandle,g | 16 | 20 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 24 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 11:08 | Korpikoski | 16 | 20 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 15 | 19 | 28 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 7:30 | Korpikoski | 2 | 6 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 38 | 3 | 15 | 19 | 28 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 5:47 | Pyatt | 14 | 21 | 29 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 3 | 14 | 24 | 33 | 41 | 89 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 5:44 | Chipchura | 14 | 21 | 29 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 3 | 14 | 24 | 33 | 41 | 89 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 4:58 | Korpikoski | 2 | 6 | 14 | 29 | 32 | 73 | 3 | 15 | 19 | 28 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 1 | 3:35 | Vrbata | 3 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 38 | 44 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 32 | 41 | 53 | 5v5 |
| DAL | 1 | 2:55 | Ribeiro | 21 | 24 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 63 | 22 | 32 | 37 | 41 | 53 | 89 | 5v5 |
| DAL | 2 | 17:26 | Ryder,g | 14 | 16 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 73 | 16 | 22 | 23 | 37 | 41 | 89 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 2 | 17:08 | Whitney | 3 | 21 | 24 | 32 | 44 | 63 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 23 | 41 | 5v5 |
| DAL | 2 | 9:05 | Ott | 3 | 21 | 29 | 32 | 33 | 73 | 15 | 16 | 28 | 41 | 53 | 5v4 | |
| PHX | 2 | 8:39 | Boedker | 3 | 6 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 38 | 11 | 16 | 28 | 41 | 53 | 89 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 2 | 5:30 | Vrbata,g | 2 | 6 | 21 | 24 | 32 | 63 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 23 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 2 | 2:41 | Vrbata | 3 | 20 | 32 | 44 | 63 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 41 | 4v5 | |
| DAL | 2 | 0:24 | Eriksson | 3 | 21 | 24 | 32 | 44 | 63 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| DAL | 3 | 19:42 | Ott | 3 | 14 | 29 | 32 | 44 | 73 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 3 | 14:19 | Torres | 3 | 17 | 23 | 32 | 44 | 81 | 22 | 32 | 37 | 41 | 53 | 89 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 3 | 13:08 | Doan | 16 | 20 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 15 | 16 | 19 | 23 | 28 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 3 | 11:33 | Ryder | 3 | 14 | 29 | 32 | 44 | 73 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| DAL | 3 | 10:43 | Daley | 6 | 14 | 23 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 11 | 17 | 32 | 41 | 53 | 5v4 | |
| PHX | 3 | 7:11 | Vrbata | 3 | 14 | 29 | 32 | 44 | 81 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 23 | 33 | 41 | 5v5 |
| PHX | 3 | 3:52 | Morris,g | 14 | 29 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 73 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 32 | 41 | 53 | 5v5 |
One encouraging aspect of the game was the solid continued play of Vincour. The Vincour/Tom Wandell unit had a defensive miscue, and they don't show up on the chance sheet in the offensive ledger. That isn't because they were playing poorly though. They generated consistent possession in the offensive zone through smart simple plays, teamwork, and strong board play. They didn't take the puck to the net, but they had chances to do so. Vincour, in particular, had a few chances to take it to the rack but decided to pass instead.
The coaching staff appeared to take notice (unless they were just sending a message), and rolled Vincour out on a line with Ribeiro and Eriksson late in the third period. The Ribeiro line looked much better in that short time, and I don't think it was a coincidence. If you're looking to inject a worker bee defensively conscious mentality into the top six you could do worse than moving Vincour up for a cup of coffee.
This recent run of demoralizing play feels like the end of the world, but there's still plenty of time to right the ship. Unfortunately I feel like I say something similar every time I write one of these up. Regardless, they can still fix the issues. Benn probably isn't going to have another game like that for the rest of the season, and the defense really can't be worse. Keep your chin up, and tune in Thursday for what has to be a better effort.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Vincour should get more playing time
He seems to be one of the few that actually give a crap good effort
Late in the first period, in this game
So…almost the second?
Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011
Excellent use of the picture...even if it is from your phone
That shows precisely the type of issues killing the team. I am not great by any standards, but I do play D on my beer league team and know the position well and it’s bad when I cringe as I watch our guys come back on D almost as much as I do watching adult league.
Nystrom and Grossman were doing a great job of covering each other…but this isn’t a team scrimmage. On the 4th goal last night I remember watching two D men follow the puck carrier behind the net so he could pass it back to a rushing D man who wasn’t covered by one of our wingers. Frustrating.
Thanks for the analysis…it is a great distraction from work
Appreciate it.
I think that was Goligoski and Larsen.
I remember smacking my head at that….but I didn’t want to take another grainy cell phone picture. IIRC there wasn’t a single Star within 15 feet of Morris until he skated into the high slot for his shot.
Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011
Anyone notice that when Fistric isn't in the lineup ...
The Stars have almost no edge on D. I thought the reason for picking up all these big D-men during the offseason was to make us harder to play against, but Souray doesn’t try to hit anyone cuz he keeps getting called for 2 minute minors, Pardy doesn’t even exist as a real team member, and Larsen even though he was not a pickup is like Daley was 2 years ago a huge liability so don’t put him with our puck moving D-man (Goligosky) if you want to play any kind of D with him out there. I know that in this particular game at least on the scoring chances it shows that Larsen and Goligosky did better than Souray/Robidas, but I think our forwards are not shooting because they are always scared that something might happen to take it the other way on the rebound. Which is not a good mindset and ended up having the Souray Robi pair playing in their own zone for way too long.
I like when Fistric gets out there and decks somebody even though it did get him a short suspension earlier this season. It seems like the entire team feeds off that and makes a stronger push forward. Is he doing something bad in practice or does he not get any consistent playing time due to his lack of assists/goals? Help me out here I would like to know if anyone else was noticing when he is missing the entire tenacity level of the team drops a LOT.
Fistric doesn't do anything else though.
He’s ok defensively, but not good enough to be trusted to kill penalties or play against top competition. I don’t mind when he’s scratched to be honest.
Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011
I guess what I am getting at ...
Is that at least Fistric is ok at the NHL level. At this point in time Larsen is not and when we are supposedly making a playoff push I don’t know why you would use AHL caliber players. I have not been too impressed by Larsen watching him get bumped off the puck and his speed currently is showing as average at this level. Don’t get me wrong he could skate circles around me and is a tick faster than most in the AHL, but I don’t understand how you like having a guy out there who does not do much more than give the puck away either from an errant pass or just plain getting muscled off the puck over someone who does the muscling…
I agree to an extent on Larsen.
But I also think he has some upside, and some value in transition. Fistric has neither. They’re so violently against using young players that I’ll take what I can get.
Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011
who skates faster besides Daley
And sooner not later we have to play our young guys. Larsen skates faster backwards than most go forward. The kid will only get better, but he’s only a rookie. Rookies got warts
Its supranatural, you know, a higher level than supernatural
by Bayouboy99 on Feb 10, 2012 12:02 AM CST via iPhone app up reply actions

by 




























