Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Was It Never Really About Realignment To Begin With?

Gary Bettman is freaking brilliant.

The NHL commissioner orchestrated the rarest thing in professional sports with his realignment ploy this season - the no-lose situation.

First, for those of you who missed the mess that broke last night, a quick primer: The NHLPA had to approve the NHL's four-conference realignment proposal because it changed the league's playing rules with regards to how the conferences and playoffs are put together.

The NHLPA had reservations about the plan, nominally about the competitive advantage to the teams in the seven-team conferences as opposed to the eight-team ones. They were not satisfied with the answers they got from the league, and they did not give their approval by the league's Jan. 6 deadline. Because of this no answer, the league scuttled the plan, at least for the 2012-13 season, and blamed it on the NHLPA.

All of that is detailed here in a great, thorough Puck Daddy article.

Now, the death of realignment for next season — which will anger several fan bases that celebrated easier schedules and more rivalry-friendly conferences under the new plan — has been pinned on the NHLPA. The NHL fires the first cannon in the public-relations war that'll be waged well into next season, as the two sides battle over the CBA.

And that is really what this is all about, in my opinion. This was never about realignment or helping out the Dallas Stars or Minnesota Wild or Winnipeg Jets. This was all about a power struggle and public relations war.

After the jump, find out how, exactly, this power play worked from the league, what we might expect from the PA going forward and the future of this realignment scenario.

Star-divide

Consider this - either way the NHLPA responded, the NHL wins.

If the NHLPA approved the proposal despite never being involved in the negotiations and having some questions about it they feel are yet unanswered, then they signal to the NHL that they are vulnerable to such power-play tactics in the upcoming CBA negotiations. It also robs them of the opportunity to get something in return for this in the talks. Thus, the NHL wins and goes into the negotiations in a more powerful stance than it did before. Even in the PR war, the NHL wins because the PA approval is would be little more than a footnote.

If the NHLPA does not approve the proposal, either through not approving it or outright rejecting it, then they lose a huge PR battle because the league does what it did Friday - blame the postponement of a popular move on the "bad guys" at the NHLPA. Thus, the NHL wins the PR battle and can use it to publicly pressure the PA throughout the CBA negotiations.

It's a masterstroke of public relations orchestrated by Bettman. It's also ridiculous manipulation of the fans that goes back to the original announcement of the plan. If PA approval is critical to its passage, as evidenced by the fact that the lack of approval has shelved it for the time being, then why not at least nominally involve the PA in its construction? And why, if the PA approval is still needed, did the league make such a big public announcement about the Board of Governors approval as if that made it official?

Because the entire thing is a power play by the NHL which was answered by a power play from the NHLPA.

While realignment was something the league undoubtedly wanted, it's obviously also something they can live without for the time being. The bigger goal in this, at least in my view, is what's listed above - either undercut the NHLPA's negotiating power heading into the CBA talks or to sour the public on the NHLPA, again, heading into CBA negotiations.

It's cynical and tactical and absolutely brilliant. The vast majority of the hockey world, at least the part that makes its presence known on the internet, is angry at the NHLPA today for quashing the promised realignment. And like was preordained since this began, that means the NHL wins.

So what's the NHLPA's next move if they are stuck in this corner where "NHL wins" lurks on every side?

Well they issued an oddly worded news release Friday night, citing travel concerns that are probably more mathematic than anything else and the issue of competitive balance between the seven-team and eight-team conference.

But my first step, and probably what I'd still do now, would be to reframe the discussion and give the NHL some stakes where they could lose in the court of public opinion, which is what I believe is really in play here.

For instance, if I were the NHLPA's PR consultant, and I am very glad I'm not, I might advise them to bring in something publicly popular that they want in the CBA, such as Olympic participation, to the discussion. I would tell them to say they wanted to do further analysis of the new plan to make sure Olympic participation would be feasible within the travel and playoff structure and they're not willing to offer their approval until they're sure the two would be compatible.

Would it be true? Only nominally, but again, this is a battle for the hearts and mind's of the hockey-watching public, something the NHLPA is solidly losing at this point. And the only way to get yourself out of a public relations battle corner is to make everyone else look in a different direction while you make your escape.

The upside for hockey fans, if there is one, is that this realignment is not dead. It's simply delayed as part of a bargaining chip during the negotiations. I have no doubt it will reappear in a very similar form since the NHLPA's objections to the plan are really there to facilitate their problems with the process. Once the process is addressed, either through the upcoming CBA negotiations or through other contact between the league and the PA, then I have a feeling we will see this or a very similar proposal put into place.

Until then, I will simply direct my rage at everyone - the NHLPA for playing the NHL's game and coming out as the PR villain and the NHL for setting this whole process in motion and putting the PA in a position where it felt like it had to say no.

Maybe next time, both sides can remember they're technically on the same side and supposed to work with each other rather than try to make power grabs.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

The Chris Kreider Conundrum

Mar 2012 from Blueshirt Banter - 229 comments

March Podcast

Mar 2012 from Habs Eyes On The Prize - 32 comments

Louis, Louis!

Mar 2012 from Habs Eyes On The Prize - 50 comments

Comments

Display:

Disgruntled.

It is a pure pissing match, that’s all it is.

by Speebump Joey on Jan 7, 2012 10:56 AM CST reply actions  

Does the NHL really want teams outside their Canadian/Northeastern Core to do well?

It doesn’t really appear so with tactics like this. I wonder how Tom Gaglardi feels about it all this morning.

by Jeff D on Jan 7, 2012 11:00 AM CST reply actions  

You mean the PA? There the ones that nixed the deal last I checked

by can we get hatcher back on Jan 7, 2012 11:14 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Based on the way that the article is read

The NHL put the PA in the position to lose either way they went when it comes to the bargaining agreement stuff.

Bettman proves again that he’s a self-serving prick. If he cared at all about the league, he wouldn’t make these power play type of moves that alienate the league from it’s dwindling fanbase.

by Travis Drybread on Jan 7, 2012 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

How the hell was the realignment self serving?

by can we get hatcher back on Jan 7, 2012 11:34 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

BTW

I’m not saying the NHLPA is blameless here. I’m just saying that the NHL is just as guilty.

by Jeff D on Jan 7, 2012 11:41 AM CST up reply actions  

So am I the only one

who thinks that the NHL has a schedule waiting and ready to go?

by Hillbutton on Jan 7, 2012 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

It does seem odd

That they could have come up with the realignment idea without at least having a sample/possible schedule made to see how it would work out/if it could work in practice.

by Huw Wales on Jan 7, 2012 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I apologise for my rant on the announcement sticky, I was mad when I saw this.

Tbh I don’t think the uneven conferences make a difference, you still play 82 games a season, and there’s this theory:

8 Team Conference, 3 teams are unbeliveably bad, so you only really have 5 that are competing for 4 spots

7 team conference, only 1 team is bad, so 6 are competing for 4 spots.

Tbh the Florida teams need to get over the travel (likewise the Canadian teams). Vancouver goes to Anaheim and Phoenix in there new Conference, likewise we go to Winnipeg.

Tonight's forecast... a freeze!!!
James Neal - 45 points. Alex Goligoski - 46 points. Nieuwendyk lost?

by Great British Stars Fan on Jan 7, 2012 11:22 AM CST reply actions  

Oh, Please...

If you’re blaming the ordeal on Bettman manipulating the situation, all it proves is that he was right about the NHLPA ~ that they would nix ANYTHING that isn’t their idea or may appear to make them the little bitches of the NHL. Kind of like an eight year old defying his mother. She tells him not to play in the street so he does it anyway, just to spite her… “You’re not the boss of me!”

So… if his intent was to show how intractable the NHLPA is, he proved it; if his intent was just to do the right thing, he coincidentally proved how intractable the NHLPA is. If there’s any manipulation of this subject by Bettman (and I can’t stand the guy btw, but you’re painting him as far too clever and sinister even for him!) it is purely coincidental in my opinion.

In this situation the NHLPA is playing the role of bad guy, because they ARE the bad guys. What we are seeing here is sour grapes on their part from previous collective bargaining agreement negotiations, and a future look at how they will react in upcoming negotiations. The NHLPA is showing their collective intellectual ages by opposing this move by the NHL. It’s like a bunch of first graders on a playground that got accidentally touched by a girl and now are screaming that they were given COOTIES!!!!!!!

The destruction of the realignment rests squarely on their shoulders, not the NHL’s.

by Byakhee on Jan 7, 2012 11:58 AM CST reply actions  

..and just a second thought

Anyone who suggests that the NHLPA didn’t have a choice or was somehow boxed into a corner, is dead wrong. Or at least part of an ever growing group of people in this country that don’t understand the art of negotiation. Just quickly here: not every negotiation success has to be your idea, nor does it reflect poorly on you when you agree to the other party’s idea…actually, it earns you goodwill during the negotiation; the supplicating partner can always point back to the points on which they agreed witht he other party’s ideas as evidence that they are not the party who is unwilling to negotiate. The trouble is, our society is so awash in testosterone that we sometimes feel we must have our stamp on EVERYTHING agreed on in negotiation in order for it to be legitimate.

The NHLPA could have come out, stated their reservations, and then approved it. HUGE PR win for them. Fans and owners alike would remember this when in their next CBA negotiation ~ and if they couldn’t recall it on their own, the NHLPA would have every right to politely remind them and the fans (who ultimately hold the attention of the owners by way of their pocketbooks) of their capitulation in the realignment matter.

by Byakhee on Jan 7, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I just don't think the NHL was ever interested in negotiating

And I don’t think fans are savvy enough to remember that they stated their reservations and agreed to it anyways because in their minds, the deal was already done when the NHL announced it in December. I also think the owners wouldn’t see it as negotiation but capitulation and taken it as a sign they could try these sort of power-move tactics during the negotiation.

But I’m cynical like that. While I wish they were both working for the betterment of the league, I also think both side are really out to destroy each other, to a certain extent at least. Particularly from the NHL to the PA – most leagues hate PA’s because owners don’t like listening to their employees, and most PA’s dislike the league because they don’t like feeling controlled. It’s a mutually aggressive relationship that ends in power plays like this.

Follow me on Twitter @ErinB_DBD

by Erin Bolen on Jan 7, 2012 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Bettman is awful...

…BUT this realignment idea was coming from so many corners that to put it all on him as if it were an evil master plan is a bit much.

I am a contract resolution arbitrator (which simply means I’m called in to resolve contract disputes prior to the matter going to the courts in hopes that a settlement can be reached without the legal system intervening). I have never done sports contract law so really know nothing about it (I mostly do property disputes), but I will tell you that as an arbitrator I keep full tally of how much each side gives and takes during the negotiations. I can assign dollar values and in some cases a value based on merit or attachment and try to keep things as evenly balanced as possible. Most of the time legal language never enters into it; it’s all about making both parties reasonably happy and making sure not one or the other completely dominates the negotiations.

Long way to get to: this all means that in order for ANY arbitration to be successful, both sides must capitulate at various times and that capitulation redounds in their favor later in the negotiation. I think the NHLPA missed a golden opportunity to build some goodwill.

by Byakhee on Jan 7, 2012 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think he's sinister, per we

But I do think he had this whole thing thought through. Why make the big Dec. announcement if it wasn’t completely approved?

The PA has a hand in it by bumbling their PR side as they let themselves get backed further into a corner, bi
It I really think this was never really about realignment to begin with.

I hate labor negotiations.

Follow me on Twitter @ErinB_DBD

by Erin Bolen on Jan 7, 2012 12:55 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

NHLPA needed to mke public any concerns they had and publicly offer alternative solutions. To do backchannel e-mails with vague requests for information and then publicly only come forward to reject the plan and complain about the NHL not listening to you…is gross negligence for PR shaping. That Fehr has been on the job for over a year and is still signaling that he needs more time to do homework is pathetic. The NHLPA should fire their PR people now and hire people that they’ll listen to and get ahead of the storylines.

by joelnmich on Jan 7, 2012 12:41 PM CST reply actions  

I absolutely agree with this.

I left it out for brevity, but the NHLPA’s PR people exacerbated the situation, at least from their perspective, by just waiting around until it happened. They needed to get ahead of it and control the narrative a week ago. Now they’re the ones being controled.

Follow me on Twitter @ErinB_DBD

by Erin Bolen on Jan 7, 2012 12:52 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

oh joy

And I was really looking forward to games against the Wings, Hawks, and potential new rivalry with the Preds. Another year playing the Yotes every other game, bummer…

by darksidecowboy on Jan 7, 2012 1:20 PM CST reply actions  

CBA is

Collective Bargaining Agreement. It’s the overall contract between the league and players that allows for there to be hockey.

by James DeBoi on Jan 8, 2012 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

oh.......

Its just a sport meet………… but they have made it place for deals………. & contracts…….

I think this has to be controlled………

Bensie Dorien

prcompanionpr@gmail.com

www.prcompanion.com

by Augustine Joseph on Jan 8, 2012 11:23 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba