Tom Gaglardi Showing He's The Owner The Dallas Stars Have Needed
[Editor's note: You can listen to full audio of the post here, courtesy of the Dallas Stars.]
Dallas Stars owner Tom Gaglardi -- isn't it great just to say that - jumped on the post-game show with Bob Sturm after last night's loss to the Detroit Red Wings. It's been just about six weeks since the sale to Tom Gaglardi was finalized and Jim Lites was named the team's President and CEO and already we're starting to see a change in the atmosphere of the fanbase and the team, especially as we start to look to the future.
The first major change was the big drop in ticket prices just before the holidays, especially significant considering that the Stars already had the cheapest tickets in the NHL. With the Stars focused on getting the AAC filled up again, it's obvious that Lites and Gaglardi felt that lowering prices and maintaining at least some value -- instead of giving them away -- was the best route to bringing more fans to home games and in turn building the season ticket holder base back up.
While there's certainly a long road ahead to get the fan base built completely back up, it's been good to see the AAC not only having more and more fans each night -- but having a sense of hope about the future and what's to come.
We're starting to get a good sense of just who Tom Gaglardi is, who is already becoming known for his trademarked ruffled shirts and dark sports coat. He's got an energetic personality and smile and while he's one of the wealthiest individuals around, he is as personable and low key as they come.
After the purchase of the team was complete, Gaglardi appeared on nearly every radio show and television station in the area -- talking about how excited he was to have the sale complete and how he's dedicated to building this team into a winning franchise. What we didn't know at the time is just what sort of owner Gaglardi would actually be, along with CEO Jim Lites, and after going through the mess that Tom Hicks created it's understandable that fans have been wary about what's to come.
On Tuesday night, talking to Bob Sturm of The Ticket, Gaglardi helped to explain just what sort of direction he sees for this franchise moving forward. In case you missed it, and I'm assuming most fans did, it was exactly the sort of interview that this fanbase needed in order to get a good feeling for just how Gaglardi will be as an owner -- and it's a great thing.
"I know there's a passionate group of people that follow the Dallas Stars and we've alienated a bunch of those people over the years," Gaglardi said in the interview. "Already since the ownership change and we've announced the ticket price changes our attendance is up over 5,000 per game. That's remarkable. We're certainly ahead of where I thought we'd be. I just think the market is responding well to the story here."
The biggest worry for fans as we approached the completion of the sale was that the Stars would maintain a rock-bottom payroll, especially after it was made public just what sort of financial difficulties had beset this franchise the past few years. Without a big television contract, Chuck Greenberg found it impossible to make a big on the team because of the amount of losses he'd be facing the next few seasons.
Tom Hicks, on his way out the door, slammed the business model of the NHL and said the Stars would never make money if they don't maintain an incredibly low payroll. With the Stars struggling to fill the seats and having missed the postseason for three straight seasons, it's understandable that fans were concerned about a new owner keeping the payroll low as he tried to absorb the big losses the team was facing this season.
Tom Gaglardi says not to worry.
Stating that he makes his money elsewhere and that he purchased the Stars because he wanted to win, Gaglardi made it known that the Dallas Stars will not be a bottom barrel team and they certainly won't have the lowest payroll in the NHL for much longer.
"We know we need to get better, I've said it since the day I got here that I don't see the Dallas Stars are being a floor payroll team," Gaglardi said, when asked about the possibility of adding payroll to the team. "I think we need to be at least in the middle of the pack and then grow out of that as we continue to evolve as a team. The flexibility is there to do it but it has to be a fit, it has to be a fit with who we are and our identity and the type of players we have and the chemistry we have in the room.
"It's going to be challenging to add guys and it's tougher and tougher to do things with the trade deadline. If the opportunity is there and Joe feels strongly about it, then we'll pull the trigger."
Gaglardi is focused on not only turning this franchise around on the business side but also knows the Stars need to start winning again consistently and making the postseason, especially if they want to rebuild the fanbase. Making the playoffs is paramount to getting the AAC rocking again and while fans are certainly encouraged by the stability brought by the new ownership -- the best way to turn things around again is to win.
Gaglardi has made it known that while he believes in building through the draft and knows just how important system depth is, he also knows the Stars are going to have to spend money to add talent to this team. It's a luxury that Joe Nieuwendyk has yet to have as the general manager of the team and it's unknown just how good a job he'll do if given more money to work with. Yet the prospect of actually having the ability to add to the team is enough to make any fan instantly start to remember just how good this team was not too long ago.
There is a fine line to walk, however, when talking about adding payroll to the team. The Stars got into trouble a few years back because of overspending and signing aging, veteran players who did little for the long-term stability of the team.
Right after making a promise that the Stars won't be a rock-bottom payroll team for much longer, Gaglardi emphasized that the Stars aren't in the business of "short term fixes or buying players" stating that "the time has passed" when the Stars were such a franchise. While Gaglardi knows that this team needs an infusion of talent -- and he stated they're in the process of seriously evaluating which players are part of the long-term plans -- he made it known that just throwing money at the roster doesn't exactly lead to success.
"I know the type of team...I understand where Joe is going," said Gaglardi. "Joe is adamant that he likes this group. When we play the way we're capable of playing we can beat anybody, we've proven that. I think right now it's a search for consistency.
"The general feeling is we really believe in this group, there are some guys we have our eyes on. Whether that happens in free agency or before, I think it's going to be interesting to see what the prices are for some guys. There's a little tinkering that might be available to us although it's a little to early to say as we don't know what the prices are. The problem and the challenge in the NHL right now is we really only have three teams out of the playoffs."
This is a perfect example of just how smart Gaglardi is, not as a businessman, but as a sports owner. Tom Hicks had an open checkbook for the Texas Rangers and Dallas Stars and it did little for the actual success of those teams. Gaglardi has seen how there is no guarantee that overspending on a roster will lead to winning and he's also seen how building primarily through the draft isn't exactly a recipe for success either, as he pointed directly to the Edmonton Oilers as an example.
Instead, he understands there's a balance in how to build a team and that each move is risky and must be approached as smartly as possible.
Gaglardi won't be as hands on as an owner as Jerry Jones or Mark Cuban, but he's so much more than Tom Hicks ever hoped to be. Gaglardi is a hockey fan first and foremost and it shows whenever he talks publicly about the team. Having an owner that not only understands the business of hockey but also how the sport actually works is beyond valuable, and having Jim Lites rebuilding the business side is an incredible asset as well.
It's obvious that Gaglardi didn't buy the Stars to make a profit and he's a fan just like everyone else. He says "we" when talking about the team and the fans and he's quickly becoming the exact sort of owner this team and this fanbase has needed for a long time now.
There are many, many obstacles ahead in order to get the Stars back where they deserve to be. The good news is that the first -- getting an owner who is passionate about the team and the sport -- is already taken care of.
52 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It was fun to be of those fans in AAC when Edmonton was visiting and Gaglardi was shown to people.
Good news is, we can wait now. Not the new owner or who will we lose because the team has no money.
No rush with moves right now. At some point a move might be here, since it can be done.
And while I won’t be having fun with cheaper tickets, I’m glad that you guys/girls are.
Trevor Daley is my cup of tea.
One of... Sleep needed.
Trevor Daley is my cup of tea.
by Henri Muroke on Jan 4, 2012 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
I think his bid alone proved he wasn't in it to make money.
When everyone else was saying “at that price, we can’t make the numbers work,” Tom said “screw the price, I want this team!”
Love it. And I’m excited to watch this team be rebuilt.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Patience is a virtue.
It has been few years, but now it’s a good thing, loving it.
Trevor Daley is my cup of tea.
by Henri Muroke on Jan 4, 2012 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
Gaglardi has the right idea here.. You cant only rely on the draft but you dont want to over spend on free agents… Basically you dont want to be edmonton or buffalo. Also i almost soiled myself with the I make my money other ways shows he’s here to win and not to just own a playtoy ala Wang in new york we got the best ofour prospective buyers imo
by can we get hatcher back on Jan 4, 2012 12:58 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Excellent news
And he really does sound like exactly what we needed.
Out of curiousity, how much say did Tom Hicks have in who the Stars were picking up in FA or trades? There were some pretty terrible choices made for a while there. Turgeon, anyone?
So back to the usual question: Who is the one piece of the puzzle the Stars still need?
I know everyone is still concerned with the defense but I think they’re coming along. I personally think we need a stud forward who is responsible defensively. Of course, I previously thought that person could have been named Mike Richards but that shows what I know.
Turgeon was a great player, who busted here.
That happens a lot. I think the owner ultimately has as much say as he wants, since he rights all the checks. But Gaglardi has said he has all the faith in the world in Joe. Personally, I think he’ll be fairly hands off.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
I like turgeon
His daughter and son were in my hockey team and showed up from time to time to help coach us… That being said i guess im a little biased
by can we get hatcher back on Jan 4, 2012 1:26 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
No one is saying he's not a nice guy
The fact remains, he played terribly for us and was a complete wash.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
I think what made it worse
Is that they went and got Scott Young to help Turgeon and that compounded the problem long term.
I did always like Turgeon as a player before that- he was just a bad fit for whatever reason here.
BTW what was it with the 90’s Stars teams picking up whichever player kicked their ass in the playoffs?
My dream piece is Zach Parise
But I’m a little biased because he’s my favorite player in the league.
Parise still hasn't signed an extension.
I think we would have a shot at him.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Still though, Ideally we would like a center.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Yeah, I think C is more of a need than another winger
But Parise is still my dream piece, and as long as he hasn’t signed long term with NJ, I’m not giving up the dream.
We need a C to play between Benn and Eriksson
Also Ribs isn’t getting any younger from here on out.
"The Dallas Cowboys announced they have released Jerry Jones."
Fine, I'll take Spezza.
Since I’m dreaming and all. I don’t think Ottawa is going to be a seller.
Parise has a Stars connection.
His dad played for the Northstars.
What the Puck?
by DirtyBrotenScoundrel on Jan 4, 2012 3:48 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
If I could have any
UFA, it would be Suter. #1 D..don’t know how else we’ll get one of those anytime soon.
by StarzenheimerSchmidt on Jan 4, 2012 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
Ditto
What about our old trading partners, the Habs? Think they’d let Michael Cammalleri go?
I'm working under the assumption that the West doesn't want to help the Stars
And most of the good centers in the East seem to be under contract until 2999 or so.
It wasn’t just Turgeon
If I remember correctly, there was a whole string of strange things going on at the time he was signed. They signed Turgeon, Kamensky and Donald Audette, looking to make a huge free agent splash and try to re-energize the thing after getting swept by the Blues in the second round. None of those dudes fit the system and Gainey/Hitchcock ended up getting fired before the season was up. I never did hear if Hicks was in some way responsible for that thing, but it looks very comparable to what he did with the Rangers when he went out and signed Ken Caminiti, Andres Gallaraga and Rafael Palmeiro, one winter after he said he wanted to rebuild.
I really like what I hear from him.
Love the ‘I make my money elsewhere’ part. He’s obviously got plenty of it. The future definitely seems bright, which is exciting.
Gaglardi does seem like a really nice guy, even just in pictures. Maybe it’s the chubby face. LOL.
Patience is not a virtue I possess, though, and while I don’t want them throwing cash at anyone and everyone to try to buy a championship, I am very anxious for them to make a personnel move that can elevate them above mediocrity.
still...
the paradox of “we won’t stay at the floor / we’re not throwing money at FA’s” is the hurdle.
true, it’s a fine line between spending the right amount on the right player. but you can’t neglect the fact that the Premier players in this league want nothing to do with the Western Conference and long for the small travel of the East.
Yes, we’re moving to the Central. Yes, travel will be lighter. But it’s nothing like what the Eastern Conference gets. And players know this all too well. Mix in the fact that we’re not an original 6 team and you get a destination team. Face it: who was the last superstar to sign with Dallas as a Free Agent. Most of the best and brightest were traded here.
I think the barrier of Dallas being a not-so-awesome team to play for (in regards to fan support and travel) is the MAIN one that Tom has to break down.
to sum it up: we should look for a trade. and since THOSE don’t happen anymore, look for Draft Picks.
vimeo.com/graylikethecolor
twitter: @grayisthecolor
instagram: _graylikethecolor_
PSN: graylikethecolor
by graylikethecolor on Jan 4, 2012 2:56 PM CST reply actions
Well...
Playing in dallas you actually save a significant amount of money on taxes so thats plud i guess
by can we get hatcher back on Jan 4, 2012 3:14 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Eastern Teams will start traveling much more as well...
Since they play in every arena once. The new set up has actually reduced travel complaints to almost zero (except for the Florida teams)
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
well...
my point about Eastern Travel is that they’re all clustered relatively close together. Travel for them sometimes is the equivalent of flying from Dallas to Ft Worth.
vimeo.com/graylikethecolor
twitter: @grayisthecolor
instagram: _graylikethecolor_
PSN: graylikethecolor
by graylikethecolor on Jan 4, 2012 4:18 PM CST up reply actions
No kidding...
Rangers/Islanders/Devils have a lock on home/road scheduling. They are in the same division and they are all an hour away from eachother. Why can’t they split the new divisions so they all have to travel a few hours by plane like the Stars!
I like to think it would be a fairly desirable team to play for
especially with the ownership situation resolved.
I know there were some of us last July 1st thinking “Jeez, who’s gonna sign with this team”, what with how uncertain everything was at the time. And Pardy notwithstanding, we still signed a decent group of players. No one top tier, of course, but it was also a pretty weak year for FA’s without a lot of huge names out there.
Solid ownership, a commitment to winning, a history of success (the last 3 years notwithstanding), nice facilities, new conference realignment making the travel less daunting…. I don’t think it’s that undesirable a team to play for.
Plus the City of Dallas is awesome.
Even if many people only find that out after they move here.
What the Puck?
by DirtyBrotenScoundrel on Jan 4, 2012 3:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
If they like to play golf on their off-days
this shouldn’t be such a bad place to come. I’d rather draft and grow my elite talent anyway, and sign free agents who will be the guys we need to complete the puzzle. There are going to be exceptions, but that would be my preference for an organizational strategy.
I agree.
And that’s what Joe is doing. Hopefully that can keep landing successful players later in the draft. I just wish we could re-do that 2009 first round dreams about Ryan Ellis.
Ditto on the 2009 draft...
Every time I see Glennie I think, wow we could have had the future #1 Dman on the ice for the next decade right there… Of course I think that almost every year, Cam Fowler and his -25 to -19 in 2010 and 2011, being the exception. So when does Oleksiak start coming up??? I was frothing last year prior to the draft, thinking about a Chara presence on the ice.
Met him at the game last night
and I have to say, although I didn’t get to speak with him for very long, he was very approachable and seemed like a great guy. He’s exactly the guy that this franchise needs. He’s got money to spend, a passion for the game, and is visible to the fans. Plus, unlike other owners in the metroplex, he knows when to let the GM make decisions.
"If the laws of physics no longer apply in the future, God help you."
Jerry Jones knows when to let the GM make the decisions.
Every Time.
As long as Jones is the owner, the GM for the cowboys has job security.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Mark Cuban, as involved as he is really let's Donnie Nelson do his job.
Most of the Mavs’ trades and pickups are worked out by Donnie Nelson and signed off by Mark Cuban. Also, Cuban takes care of the business side. Nolan Ryan is very much the same way. He has the final say, but Jon Daniels does most of the work. Jerry Jones is realy the only one that does the GM’s job.
Great to hear for you guys
I have XM Home Ice and they played this after the game last night. Was really impressed — not just by a somewhat down-to-earth owner, but just that he was clearly a hockey guy (talking about lines and possession and more!) with some clue and critical thinking about the toy he just bought. As opposed to a developer or tycoon hoping to cash in on a land deal.
Anyway, good to hear and it sounded like the attendance increase since he slashed prices is also a great sign. So cheers to you all; I know ownership uncertainty is ten levels of hell.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.
HEY WORLEY
Here’s a topic you should start collecting Data on: Top 5 Deciding Factors in Free Agency.
We can speculate all we want, but I’d love to hear what current, former and prospective Free Agents look at when deciding a new home. Starting with Ryder and anyone else you can cozy up to in the visitor’s room.
I ask this of you, because I want to know what players think of Dallas who’ve signed here or arrived via trade. Sure, Richards made it known that ownership was his number 1 issue, but I think we can all agree he just wanted to go back East and play for an O6 team. You can’t fault him for making HIS decision on HIS terms (regardless of how much i WANT to), but I’d like to hear some insight as to what motivates players to make their choices.
(this might be completely out of reach, but hey, i figured i’d give it a shot).
vimeo.com/graylikethecolor
twitter: @grayisthecolor
instagram: _graylikethecolor_
PSN: graylikethecolor
by graylikethecolor on Jan 4, 2012 4:27 PM CST reply actions
i would say yes. yes it does.
but i think he had his eye on NY for a long, long time.
wanted to play for Torts. wanted to play in a big city. wanted to play on an O6 team.
i think he knew he was getting paid and for whatever length he wanted.
it was never about how much or how long it was where.
vimeo.com/graylikethecolor
twitter: @grayisthecolor
instagram: _graylikethecolor_
PSN: graylikethecolor
by graylikethecolor on Jan 4, 2012 4:51 PM CST up reply actions
I certainly won’t argue with you there
and I totally agree with your post below. Signing a superstar free agent from another team these days almost always means having to commit to a point in time well outside their window of usefulness to the team, and having to accept that you will have 2-4 years worth of dead money for that player. Unless the upcoming work stoppage does something to curb those kinds of contracts, that is.
Ahh Richards...
I loved his game, leadership, PP presence, hell he was one of the best players we have picked up in a very long time. Richards is doing well in NY, with a lucrative contract, in the biggest market, and reunited with Torts; you can’t blame the guy and I wish him the best. What we did in the offseason with no money and one hand tied behind our backs was amazing. I am still looking at this team in disbelief. In Joe we trust…
and this still doesn't answer the question of
where will we spend $$$ and how much?
until i see otherwise, i’ll continue to believe the mantra of: Draft smart, keep your talent, add small pieces (Ryder) and avoid stupid decisions (Avery).
vimeo.com/graylikethecolor
twitter: @grayisthecolor
instagram: _graylikethecolor_
PSN: graylikethecolor
by graylikethecolor on Jan 4, 2012 4:48 PM CST reply actions
Keep your talent
May be the most important one of the bunch. That’s the problem with spending when there’s a cap- if you overdo it, you risk losing important pieces.
I’m somewhat of the opinion that after you get past the “filler” career 4th liners, a lot of the talent in the NHL is around the same level. Of course, you always have gamer changers, but I think chemistry is as important as anything else.
So, yeah, I just got a chance to listen to the whole interview
and I think I’m a little bit in love. Too bad he’s married. LOL.
Seriously, though, an owner analyzing our lines and talking about junior hockey and watching R&R broadcasts at home on his 60 inch HD by the fireplace and saying it’s playoffs or bust and the goal is to win championships and joking that he’s got along ways to go to overshadow Jerry Jones and Mark Cuban…. that was all just made of win.
Now I’m watching the Devils-Bruins and dreaming of Zach Parise in a Stars jersey, though he’d need to change numbers.

by 



























