Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

What Is The Stars Powerplay Doing Right, And What Can They Improve?

All data as of 3:00 PM Friday 1/20/2012. All numbers via NHL.com and behindthenet.ca.

The Stars power play has struggled this season. They currently sit 25th in the NHL in power play percentage. Compounding the issues are the dual holes in the lineup caused by the injuries to Jamie Benn and Mike Ribeiro. Before the injuries several factors had been cited as major contributors to the Stars' power play woes.

The Stars take too many penalties, which, inevitably means that they will take some penalties on the power play with Sheldon Souray, Brenden Morrow, and Steve Ott taking regular power play shifts. They stand still too often with the extra man instead of working to find open ice without the puck. They're now missing both Benn and Ribeiro. Glen Gulutzan, though, referenced one issue in particular on Thursday that unexpectedly grabbed my attention:

"I think sometimes everyone gets so results based – and it is results based business – however results just don’t always turn on a dime," said Stars coach Glen Gulutzan. "Our power play has created chances. We’ve had guys at the net, we’ve hit posts and they just haven’t gone in. "

This quote struck me on a couple levels. First, he's absolutely right that power plays are measured in terms of results instead of the process the team goes through to create the results. The same criteria, results, is ultimately used in any profession. And, ultimately, when evaluating an organization as a whole it's necessary for the results to be present otherwise watching sports in particular is a pointless waste of time.

However, the process could still suggest that a given team should be getting different results than they are at any given moment. The St. Louis Blues and Minnesota Wild are perfect examples. Once luck dragons took over they appropriately switched places in the standings. The driving factor being scoring goals is shots (which are driven by scoring chances and Corsi). Shooting percentage and save percentage, over time, have been proven to almost always regress to the mean over time. Some dynasties excluded.

Shots continuously drive scoring. They are the statistical representation of the "process" a team goes about to generate offense. If the Stars process is truly working then the Stars should be generating copious shots with the extra man. Below are the Stars season by season power play shot totals. I used the available five seasons worth of data (so 150 team seasons with 30 teams each playing in the five seasons). PP S/60 is power play shots per 60 minutes. Rank is where the PP S/60 ranks among the 150 team seasons included, and PP% is the power play percentage in that given season.

Year Rank PP S/60 PP%
2010 20th 56.2 18.60%
2011 28th 54.17 17.91%
2009 105th 47.4 15.38%
2012 144th 41.8 14.09%
2008 146th 41.5 18.08%

Notice a pattern? Outside of the outlier 2007/08 season the Stars PP% has dropped in harmony with the amount of shots the Stars power play generates per 60 minutes of ice time. Currently, the Stars power play is one hundred forty fourth out of the one hundred fifty team seasons over the past five seasons in power play shot generation. After the jump I'll test the idea that the Stars power play has been better lately, and look closer at the power play ice time distribution to see if there are any tweaks that could be made to encourage more shooting.

Star-divide

The past two years under Marc Crawford were fruitful for the power play. The Stars, and Brad Richards in particular, kept the puck moving towards the net. The table above shows that the Stars are currently taking 41.8 shots per 60 minutes of power play time. The league average in 2012 is about 49 shots per 60 minutes. So if the Stars played a full game on the power play they would take about 7-8 shots less than the average team. This might seem like a small total, but consider that the average shooting percentage is in the 11 to 12 range. 12% is one out of every eight shots. Losing eight shots over the course of 60 minutes means we would expect them to score one less goal per 60 minutes. The moral of the story: shoot the puck.

What about the idea that the Stars power play is on the up and up? Gulutzan said that he feels the process is in place for the Stars to score more power play goals, but they just aren't finding holes. Throughout the course of this I've used shots as an approximation for the "process" of goal scoring. So to show how the power play is functioning I looked through the NHL's collection of unorganized power play data game by game and recorded the Stars power play shot and minute totals. The graph below is what the Stars power play "process" looks like on a game by game basis.

2012120starspp_jpg_medium

The x-axis on the chart is the game number, 1 through 45. The y-axis is powerplay shots per 60 minutes. The red line is the Stars average power play shot per 60 minute total for the reason. The black line is the league average power play shot total per 60 minutes. The green line represents the roller coaster ride that is the Stars power play shots per 60 minutes in each game.

Two things stick out about this graph. The first is the chaos around the 20 game mark. The second thing that sticks out is that over the last 10 games the Stars power play "process" is definitely trending up. A simple definition of an up trend is higher highs and lower lows. The highs in this particular trend are above average, but the highs have been all season. The problem has been the crippling lows that dragged the average down. Gulutzan was right. The Stars are more consistently doing the things they need to do to score goals with the extra man, but the goals aren't going in right now. It could be a momentary irregularity, but it does look like they're trending up.

The power play trending up doesn't mean that they can't improve more. The Stars could make a few changes that would increase the shot totals for the power play units. If they utilize their personnel differently they have the opportunity to significantly increase the amount of shots they take with the extra man, and, ultimately, increase their power play goal output.

What I've done below is made a table that shows each Stars players total shots per 60 minutes in all manpower situations to show which players generate the most offense. I've included each players Corsi Relative Quality of Competition to show how relatively easy their ice time is. In the final column I've included where each player ranks in powerplay ice time on the Stars. I broke it down between forwards and defensemen. The first group is the forwards.

Player POS S S/60 QoC PPTOI
Toby Petersen C 39 10.45 -2.147 8
Jamie Benn LW 124 9.50 0.718 5
Tom Wandell C 56 8.80 -1.119 10
Michael Ryder RW 104 8.30 1.037 3
Eric Nystrom LW 70 8.02 0.358 12
Loui Eriksson LW 109 7.56 0.578 4
Adam Burish RW 44 7.44 -0.07 9
Tomas Vincour RW 19 6.75 -0.092 7
Vernon Fiddler C 64 6.21 0.586 11
Mike Ribeiro C 78 6.02 0.9 1
Brenden Morrow LW 70 5.99 0.908 2
Steve Ott C 66 5.45 0.841 6
Radek Dvorak RW 54 5.07 0.549 13
Jake Dowell C 21 4.77 -1.084 14
Francis Wathier LW 0 -0.00 -2.356 15


Toby Petersen and Tom Wandell sit in two of the top three spots, but notice the Quality of Competition. It's very low, and as we've discussed several times Gulutzan protects his fourth line so these guys get favorable zone starts compared to the rest of their Stars teammates. The guys to focus in on are Benn, Michael Ryder, Eric Nystrom, and Loui Eriksson. The four Stars forwards leading in shots/60 (with respectable Quality of Competition) are 5th, 3rd, 12th, and 4th among Stars forwards in power play ice time per game. The two forwards leading the Stars in power play ice time per game, Morrow and Ribeiro, are 10th and 11th in shots/60.

The Stars power play hasn't been good all year, but giving Benn and Eriksson so little power play time relative to Ribeiro and Morrow is putting an artificial restrictor plate on the potential of the power play to generate offense. Gulutzan mentioned process in his quote from Thursday, but the way he's utilizing his forwards on the power play is making him miss the message the process has been trying to deliver to him all season. Benn and Eriksson are the Stars top two offensive players. They, by a mile, generate more scoring chances and shots than anyone else on the team. They're the Stars top two players, and limiting their prime offensive ice time is holding the Stars back. Morrow and Ribeiro are on the next tier of offensive players for the Stars, but giving them copious ice time at the expense of Benn and Eriksson is hurting the Stars.

Player POS S S/60 QoC PPTOI
Sheldon Souray D 117 8.69 1.041 4
Alex Goligoski D 63 4.96 0.498 1
Trevor Daley D 72 4.65 0.346 2
Philip Larsen D 19 3.52 -0.829 5
Stephane Robidas D 37 2.52 1.28 3
Adam Pardy D 15 2.51 -0.144 7
Jordie Benn D 1 2.40 -0.374 8
Nicklas Grossman D 32 2.38 0.63 6
Mark Fistric D 15 1.62 -0.898 9


The defensemen really aren't that bad. The Stars top four shot generators from the blue line lead the Stars defense corps in power play ice time. The interesting part of the defenseman list is Philip Larsen having more shots per 60 minutes than Stephane Robidas. It's a small sample, but so far in his career he gets the puck to the net. I still don't believe that he's fully ready for NHL duty, but he does have the right idea about where the puck needs to go.

The Stars still have time to fix the power play. As I tried to show above they're definitely trending upward, but there is no telling how long that will last. The ice time distribution on the power play is ultimately limiting the offensive ceiling of the power play. The Stars are going to be in a dogfight for a playoff spot from now until the end of the season. They need to do anything they can to improve. Changing the power play ice time distribution would go a long way to helping the power play. The Stars are going to need to get more out of the power play if they want to make the playoffs and one final chart is intended to drive that point home.

TEAM YEAR Win%
EDM 2010 0.329
T.B 2012 0.4
NYI 2008 0.427
N.J 2012 0.565
EDM 2009 0.463
CHI 2008 0.488
DAL 2012 0.533
EDM 2011 0.305
DAL 2008 0.549
NYR 2012 0.644
STL 2008 0.402
PHX 2012 0.438
EDM 2008 0.5
Average Win% 0.465


The above chart is a list of the 13 worst power plays over the past five years at generating shots. Included is a simple winning percentage for each team. I just found the percentage of games each team won, and ignored overtime rules. The average winning percentage of the bottom 13 teams in power play shot generation over the past five years is .465. A .465 winning percentage is equivalent to about 38 wins in a season. 38 wins a season will usually put you in the bottom 11-12 teams in the NHL. The 2012 Devils and Rangers stick out on the list, but we're only halfway through the season. The fact that we're only halfway through the season is also a positive for the Stars. They can, and need to fix this as soon as possible if they want to see late April hockey. Hopefully they can before it's too late.


Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great article.

I am also kind of baffled by the copious amounts of PP time given to Morrow and Ribs. It seems counter intuitive to have your best play maker (Ribs) with another guy who doesn’t shoot the puck too often (Morrow). Hopefully Gully makes the necessary changes to fix the PP. Larsen could also help I believe; Robidas just doesn’t seem to be cutting it anymore and another very mobile guy on the back end can’t hurt.

by modano9 on Jan 21, 2012 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

I agree...somewhat.

I liked seeing Robidas taking shots last night… finally. On the other hand, isn’t this what we got Souray for??? Second, I’m glad to see the Stars on the PP WITHOUT Ribs. He eats up too much time with the puck standing looking for the “perfect pass”. Have you noticed the last 3 games without him we are getting in the zone and putting pucks on net instead of stopping, letting the D catch up and closing all the lanes? That’s my biggest pet peeve with Ribs, when you are ahead of the play don’t stop and let them get set, get it on net. The worst that can happen is it goes in, it generates a rebound, or he snags it and we get a face off in their zone. With our face off percentages we have the advantage there as well. Clearly something has to be done with the PP, but I like the improvement I’m seeing, and the chances we are getting.

"I consistently overestimate the amount of food that can comfortably fit in a tortilla."

by Neal Broten on Jan 21, 2012 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

This is one of my most favorite posts ever.

The charts are all good. The first table is quite shocking. To rank that low at shooting the puck on the PP…

I concluded much the same here earlier in the season: http://www.defendingbigd.com/2011/12/14/2635930/dallas-stars-power-play-by-the-numbers

But so much less eloquently.

by Brad Gardner on Jan 21, 2012 2:42 PM CST reply actions  

Kudos, Josh.

I tend to just skim most of your articles, at best, because the Corsi/Fenwick/advanced stats stuff just makes my head swim and my eyes cross. This one, though, is understandable even to me. Nice work.

by WingnutInStarsCountry on Jan 21, 2012 2:45 PM CST reply actions  

Obviously with an intro like that I'm going to click it.

This is why places like ESPN fail at analysis.

“Shoot it from the point, get tip ins, get screens”.

Thats what they do as is Barry…don’t blame Jamie fucking Benn for the PP problems.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Benn and his lack of PP time

Has the highest PP points/60 last I checked and was top 20 or so in the league last I checked

by can we get hatcher back on Jan 21, 2012 2:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I’m not sure Barry has watched much of what goes on with Souray at the point this year

The obvious suggestion is to get Souray more shots. But….Other teams are pressuring him the second he gets the puck, and because he can’t really one-time it, he’s just as liable to turn the puck over or have it blocked into the neutral zone as to get a shot on net.

The other defensemen on the PP are getting time and space though….I’d like to see THEM shoot more from the point.

by Jeff D on Jan 21, 2012 6:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Theres no way he has.

“Stop passing through the box”

How often is that really an issue? Like you said, they cut his shots off. When he tries to force one it’s blocked. Goligoski still shoots a bunch, but I too would like to see the others shoot. I don’t know that point shots are really the specialty of Robidas and Daley though. Larsen likes to pump it. Putting him out there more couldn’t hurt.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 6:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Good stuff.

It’s nice to know that things are trending up, but ultimately we need results.

by cms1171 on Jan 21, 2012 2:59 PM CST reply actions  

Great post.

Worth reading, as always.

Trevor Daley is my cup of tea.

by Henri Muroke on Jan 21, 2012 3:00 PM CST reply actions  

It seems like stars want Brendan to play like a holmstrom in front of the net, but he really doesn’t have the skillset. I’d be really interested to see benn be the Guy in front of the net. I think he has the size and hands to create some havoc in front and finish some rebounds/tips. With ribs and loui feeding him, along with shots from blue line d-men.

by Wayne63 on Jan 21, 2012 3:31 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

I agree with everything written here

Though I am surprised you didn’t use your own scoring chance data for the PP as well. We consider a high number shots a good thing because, ideally, that correlates to a higher number of legitimate scoring chances. I kinda expected a comparison of PP scoring chances per PP shot as an indication of how well the process is working.

by PSyCo2012 on Jan 21, 2012 4:40 PM CST reply actions  

It was certainly a consideration.

The problem though is that you want to see the possible contributions of everyone. Someone like Nystrom takes a lot of shots (overall on the season), but he doesn’t have much powerplay time so the information would be less reliable.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 6:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Something I could definitely do is compare the scoring chances generated per minute.

I’ll file that away for a later post.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 6:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I followed that

Yea, Nystrom takes a lot of shots, but if you only include PP shots and PP chances, wouldn’t that just get filtered out? If what you’re looking is the PP in its current and recent state, I don’t think it matters what Nystrom, or anyone else, does when the team is not on the job.

I can see how you would use your even strength stats to figure out who might perform better than someone else with the PP time, and you did when comparing Benn/Eriksson to Ribs/Morrow, but it seems to me that tracking PP scoring chances would be even more valuable that tracking PP shots in determining if the teams PP strategy is due to start paying off soon, or if they still need to make changes. Personally, I think there are still several changes needed, from entering the zone through being set up, as I described on Erin’s daily links post on the PP that rolled off the bottom of the page so quickly.

by PSyCo2012 on Jan 21, 2012 6:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Small sample size.

If Nystrom gets two minutes on the powerplay over the course of a month and takes two shots then he would be taking 60 shots per minute on the powerplay. That doesn’t tell you anything. The point is to see what guys are making things happen at even strength (it’s significantly more difficult to generate offense at even strength than on the powerplay) to suggest who would be able to add the most potential value to the powerplay.

If you want to compare Jamie Benn to Mike Ribeiro’s power play production thats fine. They both play enough powerplay minutes that you can see the results (though it’s still a small enough sample that it could be misleading) to hopefully draw some conclusions. Comparing the powerplay minutes of Brenden Morrow to those of Eric Nystrom is impossible though.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 6:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Great Job!

Did Gully call you and request this? lol

The first thing that shocks me … The entire league averages less than 2 shots per 2min power play! Not even considering if it is a short power play or you get pulled off early by Souray. Not even a shot per minute of pp time just floors me. Never really considered it before, but I would have guessed good pp’s would be double or more that.

I can see the std arguments that Ribs is out there as the playmaker and Morrow as the net presence to screen the goalie and get tips/garbage. otoh that has not been working. I also understand Gully trying to keep lines together … but I would love to see something like Benn in front of the net and Eriksson roving through the slot looking for the high tip with Ribs on the half wall.

by 1paniolo on Jan 21, 2012 8:08 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah, you can't just ignore line chemistry.

But they have to get the puck to the net.

Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011

by Josh Lile on Jan 21, 2012 10:52 PM CST up reply actions  

It may mean your lines are jumbled a bit

when you return to even strength also, as you let the guys out on the pp recover.

But this is a huge part of being a winning team, and the way it is set up now is not working. As you say it seems to be trending up, so I don’t mind them trying to make it work. But if it doesn’t start producing results they really need to try something different before we sink too far down.

by 1paniolo on Jan 22, 2012 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba