Mike Richards Calls Visor Rule "Hypocritical"; Dallas Stars Celebrate On Twitter
A couple of interesting lunchtime notes for you Dallas Stars fans on a cold Friday afternoon....
There's no doubt that the turning point of the game on Thursday night was the big hit by Brenden Morrow on Anze Kopitar after the Kings had taken a 4-3 lead. Not only did Morrow's hit carry on the tone that he had set early in the game, it also led to a fight with Mike Richards that would give the Stars a four-minute power play.
Richards, as you would expect from a good teammate, went after Morrow after what likely resembled an insanely dangerous hit in real time. While we know from replays that Morrow's hit was legal -- both the Stars and Kings agreed after the game the hit was clean -- Richards felt he needed to answer for the hit by fighting Morrow.
The NHL has an instigator rule that is rarely correctly applied and in this case, it was. Richards forced Morrow into a fight after a hit on another player. What set this one apart is that Richards was hit with another rarely called penalty, "instigating a fight while wearing a visor." After the game, Richards let it be known via Twitter he wasn't a big fan of the rule:
More....
Here's the rule according to the NHL rule book:
46.6 Face Protection - If a player penalized as an instigator of an altercation is wearing a face shield (including a goalkeeper), he shall be assessed an additional unsportsmanlike conduct penalty. Should the player (including a goalkeeper) who instigates the fight be wearing a face shield, but removes it before instigating the altercation, the additional unsportsmanlike conduct penalty shall not apply.
There's going to be a debate here about several things, notably -- does the visor rule actually keep players safer during fights and will it actually keep players from fighting with their visor on? The spirit of the rule is to protect players who don't have visors from fighting players that do -- creating an unfair advantage in the fight.
I don't necessarily agree with the rule, seeing as how I've yet to see a fight where a player with a visor had an obvious advantage over one without. In the fight last night, Richards' helmet quickly came off and Morrow actually had the upper hand for most of the tilt.
Richards' argument is a bit flawed here, seeing as how the NHL doesn't actually require players to wear visors anyway. The rule exists in a league where players do and don't wear them -- if the visor was mandatory, I have a feel the rule might be changed to accomodate the fact that all players are now on the same playing field.
What do you think?
For those that decided not to stay up late after the game, you missed one heck of a party by the Dallas Stars on Twitter. We've seen this before this season, and it's just another example of how great the chemistry in the locker room is this season, especially compared to last year.
Hopefully that chemistry results in a few more victories for the Stars down the road.
For those that missed it, here are the highlights of the Great Twitter Celebration.
@jamiebenn14: And thats why 21 should be in the #ASG Big 2 #PeskyStars #RoadWarriors
@TeeP17: Big bounce back win by the boys tonight...or morning for those back in the Big D. @DallasStars at their..yep...peskiest! #LouiLoui
@otter2nine: Old time hockey. #PeskyStars #sweetlou #sayaboomboomboom
@Fistric28: Huge road win for those #PeskyStars great game by sweet Lou 21! #paceyforsixth
@TeeP17: Things @jamiebenn14 says: "Petey, you need to turn the TV off and close your eyelids--it's shutsy time." #whoamitoargue #sayaboomboomboom
@Fistric28: #sayaboomboomboom
@jamiebenn14: Flight to Big D tonight! #sayaboomboomboom
@enystrom23: "@otter29: Old time hockey. #PeskyStars #sweetlou #sayaboomboomboom" huge win #sayaboomboomboom
@gollygoose33: Great road win tonight by the #PeskyStars Sweeet Loooouuu with a #ASG effort #sayaboomboomboom
@Minimo1zero: Everybody now! #sayaboomboomboom
@jamiebenn14: @Minimo1zero did I just hear you #SayAboomboomboom
@otter2nine: @jamiebenn14 @minimo1zero haha, get there early on sat for warmups ur #PeskyStars are coming out of the tunnel tooooo...#sayaboomboomboom
Here's the song they're referring to. Jock Jams, Hell Yeah!
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Seeing their hashtag was kinda cute, the song eh, not so much. I wish I hadn't listned now..
Gotta have hockey!
@zubov56 on twitter
that song is the epitome of early 90s music.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Early
90’s music is great. This song? No.
by StarzenheimerSchmidt on Jan 13, 2012 1:56 PM CST up reply actions
it's great for the same reasons that Whoop There It Is is great.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Don't hate on Jock Jams
Defending Big D Check it out
Twitter
"You guys are talking about living forever like it’s a real thing, but I bust out a man shoving his head into a vagina, and it’s srs time?"
--iorange555 8/23/2011
by Josh Lile on Jan 13, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
lol
“Petey, you need to turn the TV off and close your eyelids—it’s shutsy time.”
I would give a lot to hear Jamie Benn say that.
that's the hilarity of hockey
99% of the players give the generic canadian response to media questions, and are completely different people with the team. the stuff we don’t see or hear is absolutely priceless (and probably what i miss most about playing).
Simple answer.
Just have players drop helmets and gloves to fight. No worry about visors that way…but alas, no weapons of opportunity, either…
Our GM,
who art in the front office,
on Conn Smythe be they name.
by ex_seraphim (Angelou del Angel) on Jan 13, 2012 12:55 PM CST reply actions
Richards is a joke. League does NOT require visors.
League also does NOT encourage instigation. If you dumb enough to instigate a fight, take the helmet w/visor off. But since you are dumb enough to instigate in a first place, I don’t think you have brains to think about the visor. Enough said.
He said they WANT them to wear visors
While I’ve expressed my distaste for “standing up” for a player when they’re checked cleanly, I don’t think what he said is out of line.
It is kind of a dumb rule if you think about it- they encourage players to wear visors to protect them from pucks but don’t care about fists?
Let’s be honest- fighting someone with a visor would suck…which is why the rule is out there. But if you’re going by the idea that a fight should be spontaneous, you’re not always thinking rationally.
Fighting somebody with a visor would not suck any less or more than fighting somebody with a helmet on.
Point is, want to fight – take the helmet off. that’s what Morrow does when he wants to fight and have a chance to do.
I was up way too late last night...
and watching the twitter party made it all better. Makes me wish I could hang out with the guys.
by Jenny Z on Jan 13, 2012 1:31 PM CST via Android app reply actions
Good stuff
wish i had stayed up to be a part of that twitter party.. funny stuff to see all the guys going back and forth like that.,
born to destroy
It's the players responsibility to know the rules.
I don’t think there’s any problem with the rule. To me it makes sense. Some of those visors are pretty huge and if you’re going to wear one you have to know what it entails. He can be mad if he wants but the point is he obviously didn’t know the rule and that’s the only reason he’s upset.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
I don't think
this was the correct application of the instigator rule. Morrow didn’t strike me as unwilling
Seems like a visor has more potential to harm the opposing fighter...
Than to protect the person wearing it during a fight. Didn’t Morrow (or was it Ott or both) break his hand fighting? Seems like you could get a nasty hand injury punching a visor. They should just say no gloves, no helmet during fights as the rule.
This was always my understanding.
The visor rule was to protect the opponent. Nobody wants to punch a hard visor with sharp edges! Goes double if you instigate and cause the fight then the other guy hurts his hand punching your visor.
this is what i miss most about playing hockey every day
the ridiculousness in the locker room, after games, practices… especially after big wins. oh to be a goalie taller than 5’8". i’ll keep dreaming…
This team is having way too much fun together
I feel really good about their chemistry moving forward after their twottei display and the “anarchy” that ensued after Kari was bowled over.
Richards is probably just frustrated
He doesn’t have much of an argument in my opinion, regardless of how often the rule is applied.
He did what he felt he needed to do in the heat of the moment and I don’t fault him for that. It’s just he needs to accept the resulting penalties.
I can see why the visor rule applies. Think about it just a second… Someone instigating a fight is often a quick thing when it happens especially when in reaction to a hit. It’s kind of chicken to do so from behind the protection of a face shield irrespective of how quickly the lid comes off after the fight has started.

by 




























