Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Dallas Stars Impact Player #20: Andrew Raycroft

Over the next month, Defending Big D will be counting down the most important "impact" players for the upcoming season for the Dallas Stars. Starting from the player we believe will have the smallest influence on this season to the player with the most, we'll countdown from #23 all the way to the top as we get ready for what we hope will be a very promising season.

Calling Stars backup net minder Andrew Raycroft number twenty in this countdown is somewhat ironic, because he's an unfortunate collision away from being vaulted up to number one (knock on wood) under the right circumstances. The collision being Kari Lehtonen's. Not his. Such is the life of a backup in the NHL.

The overwhelming consensus among Stars fans is that Kari Lehtonen was overused last year, particularly down the stretch. He played a career high 69 games and twenty three in a row to end the year on the way to the loss in Minnesota. (68 starts was only good enough for 4th in the league, surprisingly.) That's a debatable point when every game for the last seven weeks meant the difference between a playoff position and lack thereof, but it's probably safe to say that Andrew Raycroft feels he has more to offer this year in terms of ice time and consistency.

A Raycroft start meant confidence for fans and players alike early on in the season. Of his fourteen starts TEN came before the New Year and he went 7-3 in those contests with a .926 save percentage, including games he nearly single handedly stole all by his lonesome against the Capitals (37 saves on 38 shots) and the Predators (44 saves on 46 shots). Then came the second half of the year.

Two very unfortunate games, the two single most unfortunate games in this bloggers mind last year when charting the course of the season, came on Andrew Raycrofts watch. The first was the seven goal shellacking he received in Calgary on January 21st, ending a near perfect run that month and opening the flood gates that would follow in Vancouver two nights later just before the All-Star game. The second was the catastrophic moment in Boston where he allowed two goals in 80 seconds before being shown the bench door by Marc Crawford. He would receive only one additional start the rest of the season after that.

Given the notoriously stiff competition in the West and their current situation, having perhaps lost quite a bit on the offensive side of things, the Stars cannot afford to have many off-nights from the goaltending position regardless of who starts in the pipes. Andrew Raycroft is an experienced, consummate professional who should once again prove to be a valuable asset to a team on a bit of a budget.

The fastidious observer, however, might have some questions about Texas Stars goaltender Richard Bachman...

Star-divide

Raycroft's deal last season was two way, allowing for the possibility that Brent Krahn could reach out and seize control of the job in pre-season. He did not, but the opportunity was a reward for a career AHL guy that deserved a chance after a stellar season in 2009-2010. This season Raycroft's deal is one way, much to Richard Bachman's chagrin.

Stars' media was all "a twitter" last year concerning Bachman's performance in camp. Those present in PEI said he was the best tender in camp not named Lehtonen, including Raycroft and Krahn who were battle for a position not open to him. That carried over to Frisco in the weeks leading up to the season, but owing to Crawfords need for evidence in the backup battle, he was unable to make a preseason start. This year, with the backup battle seemingly nonexistent and Lehtonen's health much less of a concern, we could see Bachman in action.

It wouldn't affect things at the start of the year, but having someone younger knocking at the door is a good thing for competition and keeping everyone on their toes in the case that things should sour during the season. After all, this is a contract year for the 31 year old and he's currently in a system stocked with young men who will soon be doing more than just knocking on the door in Beskorowany, Bachman, and Campbell close behind.

The expectation today is that Raycroft will play more than he did last season. 15-20 starts is not out of the question. Lots of backups played more last year and it wasn't just injury that made it so. A routine two man rotation could be valuable down the stretch in keeping Lehtonen healthy. After all, hockey that "matters down the stretch" is all anyone is hoping for around here these days.

Whatever Raycroft does, he needs to do more of this...


Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would really like to see him play 15-20 games this season

It was so frustrating to watch him not be used at all for the last quarter for the season. Of course when we took it on a game by game basis, it was understandable, because every game in the last 20 was absolutely vital for us. But looking at the big picture, he needed to play SOMEWHERE in that list of games. at least 2 of them, for sure.

Yes he had to bad games, but so does every goalie behind a relatively weak defense. It’s also the reason why he’s a backup, and not a starter. Just because he had a bad game doesn’t mean you should bench him for the year. Heck, even if you decide you’re going to do that, you might as well send him to the minors and bring up someone else.

It’s funny how when we break things down like this, we start to really see why Crow was fired, even though it was such a shock to us then.

Anyways, I hope he has a good year this year. Either way, I think his time has come after this season. After that it’ll be Lehts, Besko, and then Campbell.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 22, 2011 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

It was shock to you that Crow was fired?

I was hoping and praying he would be fired! His inability to close the games, his questionable personnel decisions, his absolutely stupid strategies made it so easy to fire him. The only good thing that came out of Stars missing playoffs last season is that Crow was fired. I doubt that would have happened if they made it.

by iHorses on Aug 22, 2011 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

There were a ton of people that were surprised, including many readers and several contributors to this blog.

I think the fact that he still had another year on his contract made it a bit of a surprise to just about everyone. While there were struggles on the team I don’t think it was obvious to many people the issues with Crawford that we learned about after his firing. There was a lot of blame to go around and no one was quite sure where it belonged. I didn’t have the impression that it was all falling at Crow’s feet either. Hindsight is 20/20.

Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner

Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury

by EagleBelf on Aug 22, 2011 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have to agree with you

I remember literally waking up and reading it, and then jaw smacking against my desk.

We had no idea what was really going on. I think we all kind of developed a sort of ignorance to it. We’d seen Burish and his Warrior Sword and though “yeah, it’s all cool in the lockerroom” when quite clearly it wasn’t.

However we didn’t know that, and he had a year to go on the contract, AND we’d just just just missed the playoffs.

Who knew, who knew.

Tsudbury for King!!! (if you want a pretty scarf)
James Neal - 45 points. Alex Goligoski - 46 points. Nieuwendyk lost?

by Great British Stars Fan on Aug 23, 2011 2:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

My impression was

Everything was cool in the lockeroom, it’s just Crawford wasn’t a part of it

by Hillbutton on Aug 23, 2011 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Either way, i think it caught a lot of us off guard...

The system he had was starting to work, but it wasn’t quite there yet. It was definitely moving slower than everyone would have liked. He also had a year left on his contract, and with as budgeted as the stars were, i think a lot of us figured nothing was going to happen until about halfway through the next season at the earliest.

I’m not at all upset that it happened when it did (I don’t think any of us are), but it did surprise a lot of us that it happened that quickly.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 23, 2011 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I remember those two games though.

It just shattered every bit of confidence I had in his ability to hold up. He had such a great start and it was looking good. The first bad game I thought, “Okay so he had a blow up game. No big deal.” Then the two goals in 1:20 happened and I was kind of done. I think there was such pressure to make the playoffs and for a while there we needed things to keep rolling as they were so we kept Kari in. Then when things went south we had the same mentality, “Well we have to keep Kari in to give us a chance.” Looking back we definitely should have giving Raycroft a couple more shots.

Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner

Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury

by EagleBelf on Aug 22, 2011 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree that it was understandable for Kari to get every start down the stretch.

By the time the streak started, we were already WTFing at Crawfords healthy scratches. By the time Kari was double digit in straight starts down the stretch, I was asking Crow to start bloody Raycroft already. Crow never gave Ray a chance to bounce back from his two bad starts. He just kept fatiguing Lehtonen to the point where it seemed like Kari was still playing well, but he wasn’t stealing games for us like he had been early in the year.
It wasn’t understandable at all. Crow’s stupidity in how he managed personnel and his inability to adjust really screwed us last season.

by Waywardstars on Aug 22, 2011 10:20 AM CDT reply actions  

THIS.

I’m still VERY confident in Rayzor’s ability to play well, like he did for us at the beginning of the season. I hope he bounces back this year.

by iHorses on Aug 22, 2011 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

We have 14 back to back games this year and....

Raycroft should be starting one game in most of those and a few others here and their. He need to be at about 20 games for a good mix with Kari. I believe our D is tougher and will be better than last year, so we should be able to to get into a nice rotation.

by fivefourfighting on Aug 22, 2011 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

I'll bet he does, but...

I expect that Bachman will get the job next year and Raycroft will be a free agent.

by denniso on Aug 22, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

and if not Bachman, then Beskorwany.

by denniso on Aug 22, 2011 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can't help but feel like Bachman is the tradeable piece in the equation.

Improve our lines with a trade and throw him in a the cherry on the cake, and we can get someone pretty good in return.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 22, 2011 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely the goaltender stable should allow them

to make a trade at some point. I don’t know who, necessarily. It would be kind of cool to see Besko and Bachman both somehow succeed in TX this year, though I am not sure how that would work.

by Brad Gardner on Aug 22, 2011 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Either way they Stars have been pretty good about the goalies they trade...

Smith hasn’t ever amounted to much, and I think there was another one we traded as well, but I can’t remember who…

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 22, 2011 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not being remembered over Mike Smith...

#DanEllisProblems

Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner

Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury

by EagleBelf on Aug 22, 2011 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess he was more or less let go and not exactly traded but I think it still applies

Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner

Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury

by EagleBelf on Aug 22, 2011 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I thought it was him, but i couldn't remember for sure...

I didn’t know if I was thinking of his name just because he played with Ellis and the whole #DanEllisProblems issue.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 22, 2011 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manny Fernandez?

Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.

by Henri Muroke on Aug 22, 2011 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heh.

Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.

by Henri Muroke on Aug 22, 2011 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

they could both succeed

Here with the TStars. Look at krahn and climie 2 seasons ago. Both were tremendous in net and

by C8all on Aug 22, 2011 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I doubt Besko has much any value

And trading Bachman (though I doubt how much real value he has) would be counterproductive considering the NHL goalie situation.

by Josh Lile on Aug 22, 2011 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Besko has shown some real promise, as has Bachman

And if Campbell pans out, we’re going to have way too many goalies to deal with. Of course it all depends on how this season plays out before any of them are actually traded. The NHL level is a little fragile right now, but I wouldn’t really think it’s a concern. Lehtonen proved he can handle a workload without getting injured last season. Raycroft is a decent backup, but his contract is up after this. I imagine after Raycroft leaves, Bachman or Besko will get the call up for Backup duties. Once that happens, the other is going to be just about NHL ready, but still stuck in the minors with nowhere to go, and Campbell probably pushing in the AHL at that point. So whoever is the “lucky” guy to get stuck down in the minors will probably be traded at some point. Either this season or (more likely) the next.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter

by Tsudbury on Aug 22, 2011 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Goalies aren't valuable trade pieces

Unless they’re young and successful in the NHL (at which point you’d just want to keep them unless they have serious warts).

by Josh Lile on Aug 22, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hopefully he doesn't do much more swapping with Robidas

He made some great saves, but I had a heart attack when Raycroft turned it over. The last thing that this franchise needs is another Turco. Aside from that, I think that he’ll do fine. He did win the Calder after all, so it’s not like he is abysmal.

by Virginian Star on Aug 22, 2011 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

he's a standard backup

he’ll play well here and there but he’ll be overmatched other times. he’s dependable enough but he’s nothing special. at this point he’s just keeping that seat warm for one the young guys.

by the way worst e-news ever...

by heyitsthatguy! on Aug 22, 2011 1:40 PM CDT reply actions  

I hope plays 20 games.

And so on. Perhaps Gulutzan will be better with these things.

Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.

by Henri Muroke on Aug 22, 2011 1:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Same

Kari isn’t Brodeur. He needs to play 55-60 games to stay fresh.

by Josh Lile on Aug 22, 2011 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm probably in the minority on this, but I was ok with Kari getting all the starts down the stretch

When you’re in a playoff race you have to start your best goalie and that was Kari. Raycroft had the two terrible starts and the Stars had to go with Kari and it worked until about mid March until the whole team kinda lost it. The Stars didn’t have the luxury teams like Boston, Washington, Philly, Vancouver had where you could start the backup and a loss wouldn’t cost you.

As for Raycroft if Kari is healthy all year, Raycroft won’t make that big of a impact because you what he’ll give you, 15-20 starts and his impact will be winning those games, and giving Kari rest.

by chris1989 on Aug 22, 2011 2:18 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba