Hockeymetrics: Stars Must Play Better Within the Pacific
On January 21st, Stars fans took a peek at the Pacific Division standings and saw the Dallas Stars in the lead by six points over the Phoenix Coyotes and by 10 points over the eventual division champ, for the 4th year in a row, the San Jose Sharks.
As we all know, that came crashing down in the month of February. Just a month after leading the division by six points, the Stars found themselves in a three way tie with Southern California's two hockey teams in the cellar.
After the last two seasons, I'm not sure you could blame the most hardcore of Stars fans for being positively jaded on the day after the Stars set a franchise record for most consecutive games unbeaten on the road. Still, there were two statistical areas where we should have considered this fool's gold.
Today, I'll look at how the Stars fared in the Pacific and why they need to be better when the new season kicks off in 75 days. One in which Stars may finally get to say goodbye to the Coyotes, Ducks, Kings, and Sharks as divisional rivals.
Statistical Sagacity after the jump
First, the overall stats, which are posted in a "running total" format so that you can spot trends:
| Game | H/A | Opp | Stars | Opp | TOI | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 |
| 8 | H | ANA | 2 | 5 | 59:54 | 2 | 5 | 2.003 | 5.008 |
| 9 | H | LA | 4 | 10 | 119:54 | 4 | 10 | 2.002 | 5.004 |
| 12 | H | PHX | 10 | 13 | 179:54 | 10 | 13 | 3.335 | 4.336 |
| 14 | A | LA | 11 | 16 | 239:54 | 11 | 16 | 2.751 | 4.002 |
| 15 | A | ANA | 13 | 20 | 299:54 | 13 | 20 | 2.601 | 4.001 |
| 16 | H | ANA | 15 | 21 | 359:54 | 15 | 21 | 2.501 | 3.501 |
| 17 | H | SJ | 20 | 25 | 422:46 | 20 | 25 | 2.838 | 3.548 |
| 29 | A | PHX | 22 | 30 | 482:37 | 22 | 30 | 2.735 | 3.730 |
| 30 | A | SJ | 25 | 32 | 547:37 | 24 | 32 | 2.630 | 3.506 |
| 31 | H | SJ | 28 | 36 | 608:57 | 27 | 36 | 2.660 | 3.547 |
| 36 | H | PHX | 28 | 37 | 668:57 | 27 | 37 | 2.422 | 3.319 |
| 46 | H | LA | 30 | 38 | 728:57 | 29 | 38 | 2.387 | 3.128 |
| 54 | H | PHX | 32 | 41 | 790:10 | 31 | 41 | 2.354 | 3.113 |
| 63 | A | PHX | 35 | 43 | 850:10 | 34 | 43 | 2.400 | 3.035 |
| 64 | A | ANA | 38 | 47 | 915:06 | 37 | 47 | 2.426 | 3.082 |
| 65 | A | SJ | 41 | 49 | 975:06 | 40 | 49 | 2.461 | 3.015 |
| 66 | A | LA | 45 | 52 | 1035:44 | 44 | 52 | 2.549 | 3.012 |
| 69 | H | LA | 47 | 55 | 1095:44 | 46 | 55 | 2.519 | 3.012 |
| 70 | H | SJ | 50 | 61 | 1155:43 | 49 | 61 | 2.544 | 3.167 |
| 73 | H | ANA | 53 | 65 | 1217:25 | 52 | 65 | 2.563 | 3.204 |
| 75 | A | PHX | 54 | 67 | 1282:25 | 53 | 66 | 2.480 | 3.088 |
| 76 | A | SJ | 54 | 73 | 1342:25 | 53 | 72 | 2.369 | 3.218 |
| 77 | A | LA | 55 | 76 | 1402:25 | 54 | 75 | 2.310 | 3.209 |
| 78 | A | ANA | 59 | 79 | 1462:25 | 58 | 78 | 2.380 | 3.200 |
When you look at the stats, the first thing that should jump out to anyone is that the Stars were in a negative goal differential right out of the gate. That is if you disregard Brad Richards' 5-on-3 goal that gave Dallas a brief 1-0 lead in their first divisional game against Los Angeles way back on October 26th.
As it was, Los Angeles and Anaheim delivered back to back 5-2 drubbings to put the Stars at a -6 goal differential. And they never really got close to even treading water in this department finishing up with a -20 differential.
So naturally after looking at that stat, I'm sure you'll knee-jerk in pointing your finger of blame at the special teams. And you'd be about half-right.
But not for the reasons you might think.
| Game | H/A | Opp | PP | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 | SH | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 |
| 8 | H | ANA | 6:43 | 1 | 0 | 8.933 | 0.000 | 7:01 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.551 |
| 9 | H | LA | 16:33 | 2 | 1 | 7.251 | 3.625 | 11:32 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10.405 |
| 12 | H | PHX | 25:08 | 6 | 1 | 14.324 | 2.387 | 22:47 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.901 |
| 14 | A | LA | 32:49 | 6 | 1 | 10.970 | 1.828 | 36:23 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8.246 |
| 15 | A | ANA | 36:40 | 6 | 1 | 9.818 | 1.636 | 41:41 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 8.637 |
| 16 | H | ANA | 44:24 | 7 | 1 | 9.459 | 1.351 | 52:10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 8.051 |
| 17 | H | SJ | 50:39 | 8 | 1 | 9.477 | 1.185 | 62:10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6.756 |
| 29 | A | PHX | 63:53 | 9 | 2 | 8.453 | 1.878 | 68:35 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 6.999 |
| 30 | A | SJ | 68:33 | 10 | 2 | 8.753 | 1.751 | 70:35 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 6.800 |
| 31 | H | SJ | 69:58 | 12 | 2 | 10.291 | 1.715 | 81:06 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 6.658 |
| 36 | H | PHX | 73:58 | 12 | 2 | 9.734 | 1.622 | 89:06 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 6.061 |
| 46 | H | LA | 81:28 | 14 | 2 | 10.311 | 1.473 | 92:23 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5.845 |
| 54 | H | PHX | 83:28 | 14 | 2 | 10.064 | 1.438 | 97:39 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 6.759 |
| 63 | A | PHX | 89:41 | 15 | 2 | 10.035 | 1.338 | 101:39 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 6.493 |
| 64 | A | ANA | 95:21 | 16 | 2 | 10.068 | 1.259 | 104:56 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 7.433 |
| 65 | A | SJ | 99:21 | 16 | 2 | 9.663 | 1.208 | 110:56 | 1 | 13 | 0.541 | 7.031 |
| 66 | A | LA | 105:21 | 16 | 2 | 9.112 | 1.139 | 119:56 | 2 | 13 | 1.001 | 6.504 |
| 69 | H | LA | 111:21 | 16 | 2 | 8.621 | 1.078 | 125:31 | 2 | 14 | 0.956 | 6.692 |
| 70 | H | SJ | 118:28 | 17 | 4 | 8.610 | 2.026 | 130:34 | 3 | 15 | 1.379 | 6.893 |
| 73 | H | ANA | 122:28 | 18 | 4 | 8.819 | 1.960 | 137:19 | 3 | 16 | 1.311 | 6.991 |
| 75 | A | PHX | 125:39 | 19 | 4 | 9.073 | 1.910 | 139:19 | 3 | 16 | 1.292 | 6.891 |
| 76 | A | SJ | 131:39 | 19 | 4 | 8.659 | 1.823 | 144:19 | 3 | 17 | 1.247 | 7.068 |
| 77 | A | LA | 131:39 | 19 | 4 | 8.659 | 1.823 | 144:19 | 3 | 17 | 1.247 | 7.068 |
| 78 | A | ANA | 141:44 | 20 | 5 | 8.467 | 2.117 | 148:00 | 3 | 17 | 1.216 | 6.892 |
As you can see, the power play actually did a pretty good job in the 24 divisional games this season, potting 20 for a GF/60 of 8.466. And the PK unit held opposing power play units to a lower GA/60 of 6.892 on 17 goals.
The problem for the special teams was that by the 9th game of the year, the Stars hit what turned out to be the halfway mark for goals at 10. They added two goals against San Jose at home to bump that up to 12. So in their final 14 divisional games, the power play only managed to score eight times.
And the stats also say that the Stars had issues on the power play stopping the other team from scoring short handed the rest of the way as they finished with 5 shorties against. Almost half of those where given up in that infamous 6-3 loss to San Jose on March 15th when they surrendered a pair of empty net 6-on-4 goals.
No, if you want to point a finger of blame at any aspect of the Stars game against their Pacific bunk mates, look no further than the 5-on-5 play.
| Game | H/A | Opp | ES | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 | 5on5 | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 | 4on4 | G | GA | GF/60 | GA/60 |
| 8 | H | ANA | 46:10 | 1 | 4 | 1.300 | 5.199 | 44:38 | 1 | 4 | 1.344 | 5.377 | 1:32 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 9 | H | LA | 91:49 | 2 | 7 | 1.307 | 4.574 | 89:45 | 2 | 7 | 1.337 | 4.680 | 2:04 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 12 | H | PHX | 131:59 | 4 | 9 | 1.818 | 4.091 | 129:55 | 4 | 9 | 1.847 | 4.157 | 2:04 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 14 | A | LA | 170:42 | 5 | 10 | 1.757 | 3.515 | 166:42 | 5 | 10 | 1.800 | 3.599 | 4:00 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 15 | A | ANA | 221:33 | 7 | 13 | 1.896 | 3.521 | 217:33 | 7 | 13 | 1.931 | 3.585 | 4:00 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 16 | H | ANA | 263:20 | 8 | 13 | 1.823 | 2.962 | 256:09 | 8 | 13 | 1.874 | 3.045 | 7:11 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 17 | H | SJ | 309:57 | 12 | 17 | 2.323 | 3.291 | 300:12 | 11 | 17 | 2.199 | 3.398 | 9:45 | 1 | 0 | 6.154 | 0.000 |
| 29 | A | PHX | 350:09 | 13 | 20 | 2.228 | 3.427 | 340:24 | 12 | 20 | 2.115 | 3.525 | 9:45 | 1 | 0 | 6.154 | 0.000 |
| 30 | A | SJ | 408:29 | 14 | 22 | 2.056 | 3.231 | 393:44 | 13 | 22 | 1.981 | 3.353 | 14:45 | 1 | 0 | 4.068 | 0.000 |
| 31 | H | SJ | 457:53 | 15 | 25 | 1.966 | 3.276 | 443:08 | 14 | 25 | 1.896 | 3.385 | 14:45 | 1 | 0 | 4.068 | 0.000 |
| 36 | H | PHX | 505:53 | 15 | 26 | 1.779 | 3.084 | 491:08 | 14 | 26 | 1.710 | 3.176 | 14:45 | 1 | 0 | 4.068 | 0.000 |
| 46 | H | LA | 555:06 | 15 | 27 | 1.621 | 2.918 | 539:38 | 14 | 27 | 1.557 | 3.002 | 15:28 | 1 | 0 | 3.879 | 0.000 |
| 54 | H | PHX | 609:03 | 17 | 28 | 1.675 | 2.758 | 587:35 | 16 | 28 | 1.634 | 2.859 | 21:28 | 1 | 0 | 2.795 | 0.000 |
| 63 | A | PHX | 658:50 | 19 | 30 | 1.730 | 2.732 | 637:22 | 18 | 30 | 1.694 | 2.824 | 21:28 | 1 | 0 | 2.795 | 0.000 |
| 64 | A | ANA | 714:49 | 21 | 32 | 1.763 | 2.686 | 684:46 | 20 | 31 | 1.752 | 2.716 | 30:03 | 1 | 1 | 1.997 | 1.997 |
| 65 | A | SJ | 764:49 | 23 | 34 | 1.804 | 2.667 | 734:46 | 22 | 33 | 1.796 | 2.695 | 30:03 | 1 | 1 | 1.997 | 1.997 |
| 66 | A | LA | 810:27 | 26 | 37 | 1.925 | 2.739 | 775:46 | 24 | 36 | 1.856 | 2.784 | 34:41 | 2 | 1 | 3.460 | 1.730 |
| 69 | H | LA | 858:52 | 28 | 39 | 1.956 | 2.725 | 822:11 | 26 | 38 | 1.897 | 2.773 | 36:41 | 2 | 1 | 3.271 | 1.636 |
| 70 | H | SJ | 906:41 | 29 | 42 | 1.919 | 2.779 | 870:00 | 27 | 41 | 1.862 | 2.828 | 36:41 | 2 | 1 | 3.271 | 1.636 |
| 73 | H | ANA | 957:38 | 31 | 45 | 1.942 | 2.819 | 918:17 | 28 | 43 | 1.830 | 2.810 | 39:21 | 3 | 2 | 4.574 | 3.050 |
| 75 | A | PHX | 1017:27 | 31 | 46 | 1.828 | 2.713 | 973:06 | 28 | 44 | 1.726 | 2.713 | 44:21 | 3 | 2 | 4.059 | 2.706 |
| 76 | A | SJ | 1066:27 | 31 | 51 | 1.744 | 2.869 | 1022:06 | 28 | 49 | 1.644 | 2.876 | 44:21 | 3 | 2 | 4.059 | 2.706 |
| 77 | A | LA | 1126:27 | 32 | 54 | 1.704 | 2.876 | 1080:06 | 29 | 52 | 1.611 | 2.889 | 46:21 | 3 | 2 | 3.883 | 2.589 |
| 78 | A | ANA | 1172:41 | 35 | 56 | 1.791 | 2.865 | 1126:20 | 32 | 54 | 1.705 | 2.877 | 46:21 | 3 | 2 | 3.883 | 2.589 |
Yes, that's correct. Dallas was outscored in 5-on-5 situations within the division to the tune of 54-32.
The closest Dallas got to treading water in this category was -3 in their first game against Los Angeles. And that was thanks to a Dane Coo...err...Brandon Segal garbage time goal.
As a point of comparison, the Stars outscored the opposition 118-98 in non-Pacific division games in 5-on-5 situations.
And if these stats don't tell you Dallas needs to improve their play within the division, the fact that they lost the season series to Anaheim, Los Angeles, and Phoenix by a combined 9 points should tell you all you need to know.
And apologies if my mentioning of that stat conjures up memories of Lubomir Visnovsky, Teemu Selanne, and Michal Handzus throwing late regulation daggers into your heart from this past season.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good article.
LA will be even harder next season and Sharks and Ducks are… Well Sharks and Ducks.
Let’s hope that Phoenix isn’t that tough anymore. It would be cool to see Smith finding his way, but not against the Stars.
Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.
I think LA is better, but I dont necessarily see it equating to being harder. Look at the Sharks
and all the talent they have had on their team the last few years and they havent been able to do much with it. We have played pretty good against them overall.
True
But the Kings got more physical this summer. The Sharks have been good recently with Thornton, Marleau, and Heatley, none of which can be called “big hitters”. The Kings got that with Richards this summer. And after playing Anaheim for so long, harder hitting does seem to mean harder to win against for the Stars rather than scoring alone.
by Virginian Star on Jul 24, 2011 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions
They probably are looking at us the same way.
They will have such a different approach to the Stars since Richards is gone. Plus no more Heatley in SJ now they traded him for Havlat
Now playing his first season with the Dallas Stars as a defenseman #44 STUDLY WONDERBOMB
by jordan.saleh on Jul 24, 2011 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions
True.
Still looking LA from the view where they are stronger than before and they were not the easy ones before.
Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.
by Henri Muroke on Jul 24, 2011 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
You're own division is naturally going to be harder to play against just for the fact you play them so often
That being said though, you should also play better yourselves. I think if it was more of a split GF/GA I’d be OK with that. I wonder if Crawford changing his lines so often had a lot to do with this being such a lopsided GF/GA stats whether being on special teams or 5 on 5. The lack of chemistry on our team hurt a lot, I’m sure.
Ah, nonsense. Your spelling makes up for it. :)
Defending Big D's "Official" Western New York Representative
*snicker*
"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter
*snicker again*
grammar? :-D
"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter
Only one more year
And then we can go back to dominating the Central!
by Virginian Star on Jul 24, 2011 11:27 AM CDT reply actions
that's until the regular season starts...
we at least have training camp and preseason tu cut about 3-4 weeks off of that.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter
LUCKILY
Bryzgalov is no longer in the pacific.
Instead
Now we’ve got Havlat, Burns, and Richards to deal with. Plus Shane Doan will continue to screw us AND Columbus got Carter. I really hate Philly right now.
by Virginian Star on Jul 24, 2011 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Thankfully we should have a new division soon
But I think usually we play well against San Jose and we also play good against Phoenix but they find a way to win b/c of Bryzgalov who is no longer there. I think for the most part the Stars play terrible against the Kings and Ducks.
OT:
But did anyone see that Chara got a Statue? And yet we STILL don’t have one for Mo! What gives Dallas?
waiting on 2 things...
1. New owners who have money to spend on a statue
2. Mo to retire.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter
In other words...
It will never be built because this sale will drag on forever? :)
by Virginian Star on Jul 24, 2011 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions
You got it :-)
"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil
Follow Me on Twitter
Follow Brandon Worley on Twitter
That...
…or Mo’s decision to retire or not will drag on forever. :D
Writer for Defending Big D
by Brandon Bibb on Jul 25, 2011 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Did you see that statue though?
I think they probably should have taken more time to make it. Hopefully we can at least get Mo’s stick-handedness right.
Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner
Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury
They do need to play their division better
But it was the northwest that costed the Stars from making the playoffs.
Nice Razorism....
“Statistical Sagacity after the jump”
That alone made me want to read on!
Oderint Dum Metuant

by 






























