Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Dallas Stars Sale: Gaglardi Out of Exclusivity Period, Still Working on Bid

With free agency and the draft behind us and the Dallas Stars' roster looking complete in it's reshaped form, the only thing left to do for the next 60 days or so is the spectator sport of watching this long and winding sale process. Mike Heika of the Dallas Morning News provided another update of sorts this morning and it's largely just more of the same, but there are some things that can be taken away.

The "headline" is that Tom Gaglardi is no longer officially in a period of exclusive negotiation with the lenders, but to a Stars fan that does not really mean anything at this point. To extend the poker metaphor Mike used in his blog posting, the "action" is still on Gaglardi right now and will be until he makes his move. He's trying to buy this pot, and he's trying to figure out how much he needs to risk to get everyone else at the table to go away. Meanwhile the other parties wait to see if it's worth it to raise him.

To me the key difference in what's happening now and what we thought was happening in late April is that these other interested parties simply will not go away. I don't know why we ever thought they had. In fact there are even more players in this game than there were back then.

In late April the collective impression we were getting from the combined reporting of the DMN, Forbes, Sports Business Journal, THN, etc... was that Tom Gaglardi had put forth terms that were so much better than anything else being discussed that he was granted the exclusivity period and was firmly in the drivers seat. We thought, foolishly it seems, that there were fewer and fewer engaged, interested parties and that Gaglardi's terms had essentially won the day already, with only formalities and routine legal hurdles separating him and ownership.

Fast forward over two months and lenders appear to be hoping for Gaglardi's (still forthcoming) bid to just be yet another stalking horse that raises the price further and initiates (or continues) a lucrative auction for the team.

As Mike Heika puts it...

...the bidder wants to put forth a price that will win him the team and that will hopefully not send the bidding process into an auction. But, he also doesn't want a bid so high that it's a bad deal. The lenders, meanwhile, want to agree to a price that would not be disappointing if it's the sale price of the team. While the lenders are hoping for an auction, if they sign a purchase agreement, there is the chance nobody bids over that original price.

What is unknown at this point is how long any other bids coming over the top of Gaglardi's bid would take. Would (Miller or Charlton or Quinn or Greenberg) be granted a 30-60 day period of their own, lather, scrub, rinse, repeat all the rest of this junk... Or would the process go faster that time around using the original signed purchase agreement as a blueprint?

As with several weeks in late May and early June, it's being said that there could be "news" on Gaglardi's bid this week. Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us four or five times in a row now, shame on us...?

The important thing to remember this late in the off-season is that there is no longer any rush. There are as many as five groups out there who want to invest money in this hockey team and this horrible process should at least produce a determined, patient owner with deep pockets. Whatever his name is.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Fool me once, shame on you....

Fool me twice….. Fool me can’t get fooled again!

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 11:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Link

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

HA HA HA!

I was thinking the same thing!

Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner

Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury

by EagleBelf on Jul 11, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's all just blathering

Once I feared the phrase “bankruptcy court” but now I savor it and look forward to it. It means we’ll get to see just what in the hell is going on.

Until then… I think this could get dragged out considerably.

The question is, isn’t it worth it? Or does the psychological benefit of knowing who the new owner is have such an important, positive impact on the fanbase and players themselves that they really do need to be an in a huge rush?

by Brad Gardner on Jul 11, 2011 12:01 PM CDT reply actions  

I think it has a positive impact on the fans more than anyone else...

Casual fans won’t buy a ticket right now because they think either

A.) I don’t want to give Tom Hicks my money
B.) If there’s no owner, this team is going to be crap anyways, so why bother.

Regardless of whether or not there’s any truth to them, those perceptions change completely when a new owner is on board.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still don't get this whole "negotiation period"

It seems Gaglardi wasted his window of time. Are other bidders interested allowed to make offers during that same period of time? I understand College Calculus more than this ownership situation _

Now playing his first season with the Dallas Stars as a defenseman #44 STUDLY WONDERBOMB

by jordan.saleh on Jul 11, 2011 12:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Me and only me...

The negotiating period meant two things. First off only Gaglardi could negotiate with the lenders or place an offer on the team at that time. On the same token, Gaglardi was the only one the lenders could talk to. No other parties could make an offer during that time. It really gave Gaglardi a small amount of time to go to the lenders and say I want to pay X and the lenders could respond. Or probably more accurate would be; I want to pay $225 million but I only want to pay $50 million in cash and I want you to finance $150 million and I want you to guarantee you will cover the first $25 million in losses.

The window really makes less sense in this case because they are going to go through an auction once an offer is made anyway. In other cases and maybe in this one as well if the seller is not negotiating in good faith (or has other offers coming in the back door) than the buyer can sue. The thing with an auction is that the benefit of the negotiating window is mute because everyone will get a chance to beat his offer once/if it is made and it is public.

by loomisc on Jul 11, 2011 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

So all the other buyers can just throw their name out their right now and the eventual bankruptcy court will settle the final owner. So in reality Gaglardi has made offers, but not what the lenders want. So they are holding out for bankruptcy court, most likely guaranteeing they get their money

Now playing his first season with the Dallas Stars as a defenseman #44 STUDLY WONDERBOMB

by jordan.saleh on Jul 11, 2011 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

with the way that it's going, they may have to actually push the thing into bankruptcy in order to move it forward.

Something that they’ve been avoiding so far.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heika comment on timeline
…the lenders are in this for as much profit as they can get… The lenders held onto the Stars last season and paid the bills as part of their strategy, so they want that money back.

The one deadline they face is that players start collecting paychecks in October, so if the lenders don’t want to sustain further losses next season, they need to sell the team by then.

Hopefully this is a good indication of seeing something settled by October.

by TexasWright on Jul 11, 2011 12:27 PM CDT reply actions  

They kept using paycheck deadlines and such last season...

There’s a slight motivation to getting it done by each of those, but all of the previous deadlines missed are sunk costs, and each current one isn’t big enough individually to risk them losing several million on rushing a deal through.

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Added to the price

I think the biggest problem with pay dates as a deadline is that the lenders are simply going to want to tack any money spent up to that point to the selling price.

by loomisc on Jul 11, 2011 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rushing a deal though?

As if. As long as this debacle has already dragged on, they could have a deal tomorrow and there’s no way it could be called ‘rushed’.

by cms1171 on Jul 11, 2011 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would be if they currently had no bid on the board lol

That’s more of my point.

A procrastinator waits 3 months to start his science fair project, then does it in one day. Is it rushed? :-)

"He punched the highlights out of her hair... he punched the HIGHLIGHT'S out of her HAIR!" -- Young Neil

by Tsudbury on Jul 11, 2011 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

You think all of this is crazy.....

If the stalking horse bidder doesnt win the the bidding process — the Stars will have to pay Tom Gaglardi $$$ to cover all of his costs of investigating the investment potential and legal costs etc

by Tom OConnor on Jul 11, 2011 5:55 PM CDT reply actions  

"Please, ...

can someone buy this team?!" – At least before October?

by Alex from Germany on Jul 12, 2011 3:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Before november?

And get Modano there and his shirt to the roof of AAC. I would love to be there then.

Well, one can hope.

Good times are here and Stars will take what belongs to them. Sooner or Later.

by Henri Muroke on Jul 12, 2011 4:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba