Dallas Stars Sale Could Be Pushed Into Late June or Beyond
The potential time line of the sale of the Dallas Stars is getting uglier by the day. The team has been for sale since February of 2010 but it now appears that every single last day leading up to NHL Free Agency beginning July 1st, 2011 might be used, leaving precious little time, if any, to organize and come up with a cogent game plan on Brad Richards and any other free agents that might be pursued.
We recently learned that Tom Gaglardi could have an agreement with the Stars in as little as two weeks (10 days now, perhaps) and that an organized bankruptcy hearing could take as few as three days to complete. This all sounded too good to be true and as it turns out it kind of is.
According to the Dallas Morning News, AFTER both of those things happen there will be a window given by the Tarrant County Court of 30 or 60 days to allow for competing bids to get their finances in order and top Gaglardi.
That means while an official hearing might last only three days, Gaglardi would not be able to become the owner and authorize moves until late June. That window also goes for anyone who might try to outbid Gaglardi before the team goes to a prepackaged bankruptcy hearing or during the hearing, the sources said.
Late June becomes the optimistic target date then, because if the window granted is 60 days (essentially putting Joe Nieuwendyk in the worst possible position come July 1st) then the Brad Richards pursuit could effectively die right there.
Those Stars fans that lean toward another potential owner (Doug Miller, Billy Quinn, etc) will be glad to know that those men will have a fair amount of time to get their financing together should they wish to take on Gaglardi. Those that want a shot at Brad Richards, on the other hand, must root for Gaglardi hard. (We here root for anyone with deep pockets, I think).There is seemingly no middle ground. If you want Richards, you want Gaglardi.
The Fort Worth Star Telegram suggested last week that the current 30 day exclusivity period of negotiations for Gaglardi could be extended as well, pushing this whole scenario back even further, but that's a worst case scenario.
For now it sounds as though the court's decision means the difference between hiring a coach in June or hiring one at the end of July and the difference between putting together a more competitive roster and one on the cheap again.
The hope of Stars fans for a long while has been that one day the news would break suddenly that the team is being sold and that would just be the end of it. One thing's for sure: That's not going to happen. It's going to be a drawn out, tedious, public race to the end. We just hope hope the finish line is still in June. The margin for error has been eroded to the point where everything must now go "just right" down the stretch.
Now stop reading hockey blogs and go scramble your mother an egg.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No.
The sale is going to court to “legalize” the sale, in regards to the crazy amount of lenders are owed money. Basically, it’s a clean, legal method for making sure everyone is satisfied once the deal is complete.
The ability for other bidders to step in after the bankruptcy hearing has always been known — that it could be a 2 month window, however, is new.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on May 8, 2011 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, yeah...Brad Richards.....yeah....
I’m more worried about the coach, personally. Keeping Brad is a big deal, but being able to hire the RIGHT coach for this job, arguably one of the most important periods in the history of this franchise, is paramount to the success of the Stars.
If Nieuwendyk is going to be forced to wait until JULY, then we will have to just hope and pray some more that the top candidates are still there.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
so do you not pick the coach with any regard to what players you have available?
Seems to me that at least on thing we should have learned the last couple of years is that your coach must be able to work with what’s available. Like it or not, the Dallas Stars with Brad Richards is a very different team than the Dallas Stars with out him, despite it being only one guy.
I suppose if you expect to be able to remedy the over all player picture in the next few years you can pick whatever coach you want, but I would think you want one that has the ability to take what we’ve got at the moment and use it effectively while also moving in the desired direction. It’s just that right now, we don’t know what we’re gonna have
I understand your point a bit...
But you don’t fill a team through free agency — or whatever the Stars need to do to fill these roster spots — then hire a coach and say “this is what ya got, do your best”.
The coach has a say in the building of the team he’s coaching as well. I think you need a coach in place to share in the vision with Nieuwendyk to move the Stars forward — together.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on May 8, 2011 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I also think that a good coach should be able
to work with different types of players and teams. Much the way Bodreau, and Bylsma changed the way their teams played. For Pittsburgh it was to deal with injuries to two of the best players in the league and they still did very very well down the stretch. Bodreau made his team switch from the run and gun to a much more defensively responsible style of play.
Much the way Gulutzan has been described as a versitile coach with how he has managed to take the lack of talent on Texas and create success.
Oh yeah, I agree
I just think that going through the draft and free agency without a coach is a bit backwards, but if that’s what happens then we’ll just have to make it work.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on May 8, 2011 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions
Even if the sale could be finalized tomorrow
I still fully expect Richards to explore free agency and see what’s out there. I don’t think he’s signing anything before July 1 regardless of who our owner is.
Hopefully we can be in the running once free agency starts, but to do that this gonna need to be wrapped up in June.
I think that's natural for any player to do...
Especially when they’re in their prime and other teams want him.
I wonder if Brad Richards would sign if ownership was just a matter of time...
As in, do you think he would consider staying with the Stars if it was obvious the sale was close to being resolved by July 1? Of course we’d be putting all our money on him and come back with basically the same team…but I wonder if that is in the realm.
Just trying to make myself feel better.
That's my question
If they have 30-60 days to match a bid, that still means the team will have an owner at the end of that time. What’s to stop Nieuwy from re-signing him at that point?
Honestly, at this point, I'd rather have a owner and coach in place by august. Richards
is great and I’d love to have him back, but to get this team on track, those two are much more important than Richards. He’s going to look whats out there anyway, so we need to stop worry about what he is going to do and think about fixing our internal problems first. We know we are running around with one leg without an owner. Sell the team, even if we lose Richards, we will eventually have enough money to get out there and find someone else, either through the draft, trade, or free agency. I’d rather have an owner who wants to win and has the money to do it than begging and pleading Richards to stay. If it takes a couple months, fine, get it done and get it done right.
Believe me. . .
All of you want Douglas Miller to buy the Stars. They won’t be successful under Tom Gaglardi. He will screw up one of the best organizations in the National Hockey League.
Passes come from the heart.
by William Fleishman on May 8, 2011 3:23 PM CDT reply actions
I'd be interested in hearing your reasons...
Especially since the Stars are already in one hell of a mess.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on May 8, 2011 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions
A mess indeed...
And apparently getting worse by the day. Am I correct that we will be drafting at the end of June without knowing if we have our star player, who the coach will be, who the owner will be, and what kind of money we can spend on free agents?
Maybe Chuck Norris could buy the team and fix it with his fist.
by pbatx on May 8, 2011 5:14 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Well the Richards situation does not really affect the draft....at all
This team is not changing it’s draft strategy based on Richards, or the Owner. Joe has a vision and he probably already has a good idea of what he wants and what he will do. You cannot go into the entry draft saying well we might loose Richards so we probably need to draft a potential Conn Smythe winner with top 5 scoring ability…especially picking outside a lottery position.
From most national speculation,
the Ranger are prepared to buy out Drury, etc to make cap space to sign Richards. I don’t think the Rangers are planning on offering less than what Brad is currently making. I think the Stars have to consider passing on Richards if it still takes $8 million per year to sign him. So its not just as simple as getting the Stars ducks in a row for Richards to become a reality as a member of the Stars future.
We need top notch defense reinforcement more than anything.
I do not believe giving Richards 8 per
is a good idea at all. However I believe Richards cares more about winning than money, and if that is the case it will not take 8 to get him. I would bet whoever he chooses is based on the best chance to win, and I bet the cap hit on his deal is no more than 7.
You Need a Local Guy
I think they need to have a local guy running the team, because he’ll run it better than someone all the way in Canada. I’m also worried that Tom Gaglardi will try and relocate the team in the future. That thought terrifies the hell out of me.
Passes come from the heart.
by William Fleishman on May 8, 2011 6:44 PM CDT reply actions
Check back in the archives of this blog.
This team is not moving…They are locked up with the city and arena to something like 2021 and 2031. Gary Bettman has let Phoenix and Atlanta struggle for as long as they have and not allowed them to move, Dallas is going nowhere I do not understand why anyone thinks that is a possibility.
No kidding
It blows my mind every time I hear someone say the Stars might be moved. There is so much money to be made in Dallas as long as the team isn’t terrible and sitting at the salary floor (……). Where else could the team move to that would have more potential for making money? Winnipeg? Ha. There’s a big question whether Winnipeg is going to be able to make more money than Phoenix. It doesn’t have a chance against Dallas. Simple fact is that there aren’t any pre-existing hockey markets anywhere near big enough to challenge Dallas. And if it were to move to a non-traditional market, they would have to start all over again, whereas in Dallas, they’ve created a pretty solid hockey culture through all the StarCenters. Dallas kids are starting to get drafted. It’s just a matter of time till there are enough people who have grown up hockey fans to support a team quite solidly.
You could make a fortune moving a second team to Toronto.
You’d sell out every game and you wouldn’t even have to make the playoffs!
Golf Leafs Golf!
i see both sides of the moving arguement
you people who think the stars will not be moved are right, they have a lease and it will be very costly if not impossible for them to move. but the people who think the team could be moved are also right, it would be a bad business decision to move the team and again would be very costly if not impossible. but honestly, if someone has alot of money and little or no sense, would those things stop them? i dont think so, i doubt someone will come in here and in 2 years time move the team, but if you’re making billions each year outside of hockey then eating losses every year really doesnt affect you personally. the point im trying to make is this, if you have a ton of money it means you get to do whatever you want and get away with it. for example, al davis moving the raiders twice against the wishes of both the nfl and the city of los angeles. look at hicks, he intentionally defaulted on what $525 million not counting the debt he ran up in liverpool! i work in banking and theres a name for what he did, its called fraud. if you or i had done those things we would be in prison, but because the loss was so huge, the lenders had no choice but to try to get back the money instead of taking that loss and moving on. he was an idiot with more money than sense and thats why the team is in the mess its in. im not flipping out thinking the team is going to move, but it would make me feel much better if a local guy bought the team because he look out for the best interest of the fans and the local community. a canadian isn’t evil, but knowing they could make more money somewhere else is what businessmen think about all the time. both sides have a very good point, now hurry up and wait…
by the way worst e-news ever...
by heyitsthatguy! on May 9, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
































