New Dallas Stars Head Coach Needs To Embody Confidence, Intensity
Much of the focus on the Dallas Stars coaching search has been on the "system" that each prospective coach would bring and whether his style would fit what Joe Nieuwendyk is attempting to build in Dallas. It's a worthy concern, as there were certainly times over the past few years that it seemed as though the Stars were hesitant and unable to fully embrace the changes that Marc Crawford was bringing to the team.
That Nieuwendyk would want a coach that is much more capable of building on the changes that have been made is only logical. He's trying to change the overall direction of this franchise after years of being a defense-first team and while there have been some successes, overall it's been two very frustrating and disappointing years. Hiring the right coach to guide the Stars to the next level is going to be Nieuwendyk's most important decision to date.
Yet with all of this talk about system and style and philosophy and whether a coach is defensive or offensively oriented, we tend to overlook the qualities that sometimes matter most in his coach: the ability to connect with a team and make them believe in themselves, to give them the confidence they need to win on any given night against any given opponent.
The best coaches are able to guide a team to overcome shortcomings on a roster or to move past key injuries to top players; somehow their teams are able to face adversity head on and not only meet that challenge but rise above it. When we look back at the 2010-11 season, it's more than apparent that this was the inherent flaw in Marc Crawford's teams: when adversity was at its highest the Dallas Stars wilted, and that was the end of a surprisingly promising season.
The Dallas Stars from 2010-11 will always be remembered as a team that somehow found a way to fight back, over and over again, to come back from a deficit and find a way to win late in the game. What was most frustrating about this fact was that the Stars were having to fight back because they were playing superior teams; most times the Stars were forced to come from behind for a win because they played like rancid dog meat for at least the first period of the game.
For a good while we overlooked these poor starts and focused on the "grit" that this team possessed, that perhaps something special was brewing in Dallas because this was a team that would never give up and would constantly find ways to win a game no matter what had happened in the first 40 minutes.
As time went on, and these poor starts became more frequent, worry began to set in. We questioned whether their level of success was sustainable given their complete lack of ability to play a full game from the first drop of the puck. There was genuine concern that at some point, these emotional comeback victories would take their toll and the Stars would fall apart.
Eventually that collapse occurred, starting in Vancouver and continuing into one of the worst games the Dallas Stars have ever played, a stinker of a loss against the Boston Bruins. Ironically, the Stars nearly pulled off another comeback in Boston that threatened to cover up just how badly the team had played to start the game.
Those losses kicked off an avalanche of losses, a snowball of epic proportions that watched the Stars collapse from the top of the Pacific division to being completely out of the playoff picture. What hurt the most was not just seeing the Stars tumbling down the Western Conference standings -- it was watching a team that obviously had absolutely zero confidence in themselves as a team and had no clue how to stop the snowball from gaining speed as it hurtled down the mountain.
Many will turn to the injuries the Stars were dealt in February -- most notably Brad Richards and Jamie Benn -- and state that the Stars just didn't have the talent to overcome such losses. If we think back to those games, however, we remember that this wasn't a team that was losing just because of a simple talent shortage. This was a team that had fallen to pieces and were playing like a team without confidence, without direction and without a single, solitary plan on how to correct their shortcomings.
Even when the roster was healthy once more, the Stars were missing something. Against teams that had just as much to play for the Stars were clearly the weaker opponent, failing to rise to the challenge of playing a game as if their season were on the line. The losses to division opponents in the final month of the season will haunt this franchise for months to come.
In those games -- against Nashville, Anaheim, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Jose -- the Dallas Stars did not play as a cohesive team with a singular goal in mind. They were tentative and afraid to make mistakes, lacking the confidence needed to secure a win even when they were playing well. The multiple devastating losses to Anaheim and the near-disastrous loss against Phoenix were perfect examples of how the Stars would fold under pressure.
As that pressure mounted in game after game, the Stars were fighting not only their opponent; they were fighting against themselves and their own nature as a team. There were many times in the final two months of the season where it appeared as Dallas was a team that was just trying to overcome too much to be successful, this was a team that had absolutely zero confidence in their leadership and were seemingly attempting to win all by themselves. This was a team that had no head, and the body was doing its damnedest to flail about blindly and try to hold off the oncoming attack.
It's impossible to quantify, but the Dallas Stars played like a team with zero coaching, a team that was focused on just doing it themselves no matter what might be going on behind the bench. When a team is fighting on two separate fronts like the Stars, there's no surprise that the team ultimately lacked the intensity and confidence needed to secure the points needed to make the postseason.
Watching the NHL playoffs, it's apparent that these teams were just on a completely different level than the Stars this season. While it's true the level of hockey intensity is immediately raised in the postseason, you can't help but think that if the Stars were somehow able to make the playoffs they would have been steamrolled. These teams hit the ice with a fire and intensity we haven't seen in Dallas -- in more than short bursts, at least -- in quite some time.
The speed and intensity of the game is so much different than what we've seen the Stars capable of, and that is exactly what the new head coach needs to bring to this team.
Finding the right coach to fit the system is extremely important. As we saw with Marc Crawford, however, a coach and his system will never be enough. These Dallas Stars players are hungry for a coach that will give them the confidence in themselves they so desperately need; after two seasons of basically taking to the ice alone you can sense that this is a team in dire need of top leadership from the bench, a coach that connects with the team on a level we haven't seen in Dallas in years.
Many will question why the Stars couldn't have found this confidence and intensity themselves, no matter who was coaching. It's just not that simple. When playing hockey you need to know that you can have confidence in your coach to make the right decisions and to pull the right triggers on players to get the most out of their abilities; when that coaching is not there then the result is a team that will struggle to make the playoffs -- no matter who is on the roster.
Who knows exactly which coach embodies all of these traits the most. Perhaps the "perfect coach" isn't even on the market right now. Joe Nieuwendyk is going to have to consider much more than hiring a coach that fits his "system"; finding a coach that is able to connect with the players and give them confidence? Perhaps that's the most important trait of them all.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm looking forward to seeing who joe picks to lead this team...
Once the coach is hired, I believe this really will be 100% HIS team, and not just remnants or recommendations. Same goes for the Texas Stars as well. He’s done a good job of building that thing back up, when it’s been fairly empty for so long.
Hopefully the coach will keep the team motivated in the longer months of the season. You could see once the players started to doubt themselves (and question the coach’s decisions too), things started to go downhill.
"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards
Very well said
I had the same feeling watching the Vancouver/Chicago game last night…there is no way this Stars team could have kept up that level of intensity through the whole game.
I don’t know of course how Crawford was in the locker room…but you have to think that if he showed the same lack of emotion there that he did in the press conferences then it is no wonder the team felt so low sometimes. It would also explain the slow starts. He probably put them to sleep in the pre-game meeting.
It's come out that Crawford was a stand-off coach
And that he preferred the team and the players to “motivate” themselves.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Seems that at some point Crawford would have thought "hmmm...it's not working"
That also explains why they never seemed motivated without some key guys such as Burish to light a fire under their asses
Well that worked.
They seemed to start every game with intensity and determination. They were always the better team in the first period.
I'm guessing this is sarcastic.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions
there were issues
i do believe there were issues with motivation and confidence but, for the most part, i just dont think the stars were all that good. No big shot on the power play, no right handed shot worth a darn at all, too many undersized/strength players in general and too many defensemen who aren’t good at defending.
I agree with this
And I’m not saying all we need is a coach to give them confidence and then we’re good.
What really stood out to me, watching the last 2 months of hockey, was that the Stars were losing not just because of a lack of talent but because they had zero confidence in themselves as a team. This was a hockey that was losing close games because their opponents were more talented; they were getting steamrolled at times because they were unable to play above their talent level all season long — and I never, not once, felt that Crawford maximized the potential of the team.
And that’s going to be important. There’s no guarantee that suddenly the Stars spend $60 million next season or that help is immediately on the way. Whoever is coaching next season will have to give this team the confidence and the structure needed to compete as a $45-$50 million roster against the teams that are spending right at the cap. That’s just the reality — and it’s a very, very tough challenge.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Also...hopefully the big defenseman and the big shot on the pp
Come all at once in the same body…
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions
who do you have in mind?
"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards
Erhoff.
Wisniewski. Kevin Bieksa is a UFA. Steve Montador.
There are a few.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
wow brandon
5:55 am eh? my middle finger doesn’t even start fliiping people off until at least 7. you sir are a trooper.
by the way worst e-news ever...
Well to be fair
It was almost 8am his time.
by Brad Gardner on Apr 27, 2011 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions
You must be crazy
It was…..7:45 my time.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions
while i liked the trade for goligoski
i think breaking that group up really changed the dynamic in the locker room. it was a great move for the future but it really seemed to hurt the chemistry between everyone without neal. anyone notice the warrior sword went bye bye immediately after the trade? i just think after the guys weren’t having fun anymore and since they had an abenstee coach they just couldn’t seem to get up for games anymore. again i liked the trade, but they seemed to lose all motivation at that time and it took away their offensive strength. if we buy into razors 2 out of 3 theory then that is what ultimately killed their postseason chances. they no longer had great offensive skill and great goaltending, they were just average or below average in both ends. therefore they were 1 out of 3, just something to think about.
by the way worst e-news ever...
by heyitsthatguy! on Apr 27, 2011 10:12 AM CDT reply actions
I think you're overrating Neal's contribution in the locker room.
At the time of the trade, the Stars had lost 8 of 9 and were in the middle of their plummet down the standings. This was in the midst of the Stars playing like they were utterly lost and had no clue how to fix things, getting pounded night after night.
After the trade, the Stars were 6-2-2 in the next 10 games.
You will never be able to convince me that trading Neal was what hurt this team the most and “changed the dynamic” in the locker room. Neal just wasn’t that sort of player, not even close.
And the warrior sword disappeared when Burish and a couple of other Stars players had their egos and their faces destroyed against Boston, two weeks before the trade.
Also, the offense did not suffer. Goligoski had more points after coming to Dallas than James Neal has had in his last 40 games combined.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I might contend that Neal being traded was a bit of a blow to the psyche of Richards though...
I’m not saying that Richards NEEDED him by any means… But they lived together for a couple years, and were good friends.
"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards
If needing to keep a player like Neal on the team just so Richards can feel all goodie goodie on the ice...
Means that Richards is not worth the money.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions
agreed.
If i remember the timeline correctly (though I may not) Richards was still out from his concussion when Neal was traded. It was just one more thing for him to try an adjust to when coming back. I don’t think it was a permanent damage to his psyche… it just added to the number of things he had to get used to, and may have hurt him coming back to full speed as quickly as he would have liked.
The trade still made this team far better than it was.
"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards
It might have been
but short of asking him (and the even more likely scenario of getting him to talk about it honestly) we’ll never know.
Richards was hurt at the time of the trade and then wasn’t right for weeks after returning (after Neal had been gone for weeks) and then within three games of his return Loui Eriksson had a concussion of his own and wasn’t right… There’s really no good time period to look at Richards and Eriksson, healthy and engaged WITHOUT Neal and say “Yeah, they clearly weren’t right.”
by Brad Gardner on Apr 27, 2011 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I think it was just a bad combination of factors
Richards was out, Burish was out for awhile, Loui was hurt
Neal was all but invisible pre-trade (and wasn’t exactly a scoring machine with Pitt). Goligoski was a pretty big contributor of points.
I don;t think you can say the trade costs us the playoffs. There was a lot going on.
I was/am a Neal fan. (Hey. I’m a girl and he is really hot. LOL) I hope he does well in Pitt. But as a Stars fan, I like the trade for Goose.
Yeah I disagree completely
Brandon made all the points necessary. I contend losing Burish for that stretch did a ton more damage to morale than losing Neal who wasn’t producing at all and didn’t seem like a vocal presence. You could make the case that Richards was bummed but he was also injured. I tend to think a concussion does more to hurt a guys game than a broken heart. I still don’t think that the problem was ever that we weren’t scoring enough. It was the fact that we couldn’t hold off Anaheim for 5 seconds. That’s kind of a big deal.
Heika suggests that the players were questioning decisions such as Woywitka over Mark Fistric --Brad Gardner
Maybe that's why Woywitka had that puzzled face after that goal....
"Shouldn’t Fistric have scored that?!" --Tsudbury
Great post.
Coaching staff will need more changes anyway, if Barnes goes away and if Willie will be a head coach, if not, it still needs some changes.
it wasn't one injury but all
If there was one intangible that you could literally SEE when it happened, it was the collective slump when injuries occurred. It wasn’t just who was injured, it was simply that it was happening often. What does Barch really give you? Not much, but even when was injured, it came on the back of 2 other injuries, which broke the team’s spirit. Each time a player left the ice for the locker room, it chipped away that confidence. Then you have a game like the Boston game where numerous players left. It takes time to build up momentum and confidence, and with guys in and out of the lineup, it couldn’t happen.
Add to that this team is SMALL. They couldn’t keep up with the physicality of Anahiem, Boston, or Vancouver. Oh no…..here come’s Robidas taking a run at me……I might spill my latte. Love Robi, but who’s scared of him, or anyone save Grossman (when he’s on the ice). After watching that Van/Chi series, THEY know how to clear the zone or battle in the crease. Big difference.
what i was trying to say was
that the stars collapse was attributed to only having 1 out of the 3 things needed to make the playoffs, bad coaching just made the problem worse. i am a big fan of the trade, but they went from having a really deep group of forwards and below average defenders to having average forwards and average defenders (below average with the injuries). so counting kari you’ve got 1 of the three things needed to get to the playoffs.
by the way worst e-news ever...
I still don't agree that losing Neal turned them into an "average" group of forwards.
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis
Proud member of the Joe Nieuwendyk support team.
by Brandon Worley on Apr 27, 2011 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions

by 


























