Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Who's Really More Valuable? Benn or Richards?


Before making a knee jerk response to the title of the post, think about this for a minute.  While all the talk and speculation centered around Brad Richards' injury and potential trade at the deadline, Jamie Benn returned to the lineup and showed why he is arguably the most valuable player for the Dallas Stars.  Jamie personifies the intangibles that I pointed out at the beginning of the season make this team at least a 4 seed for the playoffs.  He's tenacious, he's tough, he's physical, he never stops fighting for the puck, he never gives up, he's explosive, he makes big plays at critical points in a game, he has skill, and he's a natural leader (One example of this was evident when a camera shot of the bench during a stoppage in play revealed Jamie leaning over and instructing/encouraging his young teammate, Vincour.  The Stars are a completely different team when Jamie is healthy and on the ice. 

This does not take anything away from one of the best centers in the NHL.  Richards has been greatly missed, no doubt.  But the record speaks for itself.  When Jamie Benn was out, the Stars record was 2-7-1.  Since Richard's had his concussion, the Stars are 5-4-1 and getting hotter by the minute.  And the Stars have gained this momentum in a very tough stretch of games out west.

Brad Richards has never been accused of being an inspirational, emotional, or vocal leader.  He leads quietly by example.  And that's ok.  But Jamie displays a fire on the ice that is contagious.  And his willingness to mix it up with the baddest of boys on the pond is quickly endearing Benn to his teammates who increasingly are looking to this 21 year old budding star to lead them. 

So, as we sit here today, if you ask me who would I rather be missing from the lineup, I would have to say Richards.  Give me Jamie Benn if that is the choice.  But good news for Stars fans is:  If Brad Richards can get back to playing like he was before the injury, can you imagine how good this team can be heading into the playoffs?

This is a user-created FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or Defending Big D. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable hockey and Dallas Stars fans.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I definetely hear ya Bro.

That kid is just awesome. Is there anything he doesnt do??? I still would like to have Brad around….But, it is very nice to know we have an amazing young talent that is just getting better and better. I think to, you have to think about what an impact that Adam made also in coming back. That guy is a rock.

by k9mike on Mar 8, 2011 9:24 AM CST reply actions  

this

@rossssss
http://www.last.fm/user/ROSSSSSS

by Ross Phillips on Mar 8, 2011 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Every game has at least 180 minutes for forwards to play

Benn plays a little over 20. In hockey one guy doesn’t make the difference. There is a reason we went on a long dive when a ton of our depth was out. The chemistry those depth guys provide is invaluable. Additions of Langenbrunner (cup winner/captain), Williams (cup winner) and Gologoski (cup winner) added chemistry, grit and skill. Benn is great and will get better. Getting our top scorer and best playmaker (conn smythe winner/former captain) back will provide another huge boost. Every little piece that has come back or been added (including Benn) has been important.

God how do I get sucked into responding to your rants.

by 1paniolo on Mar 8, 2011 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

How is this a rant?

Anyways, as to your comment about the value of our depth…I totall agree. I know how important chemistry is…chemistry is a primary strength of this team. But my post was mainly addressing the relative values of Benn vs. Richards. The guys you mentioned are important. But they are nowhere near as valuable individually as Benn or Richards.

But I do agree with your overall comment…don’t get me wrong.

by 5starpuckism on Mar 9, 2011 3:38 PM CST up reply actions  

::Very matter of factly:: You have a tendency to rant.

Joseph: "You mean this wet paper bag filled with dog droppings? But why would anyone want this? I inherited it, and it has been my curse to bear."
Anita Shero: "Ay, I'll take it with the heavy axe for my forgotten shield."
Joseph: "O happy day!" http://tinyurl.com/4pxt6mu

by EagleBelf on Mar 9, 2011 7:10 PM CST up reply actions  

To be fair, I thought this was a well reasoned post.

I don’t agree with the opinion in it, but he’s done a good job of not slamming anyone else’s thoughts.

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 10, 2011 7:56 AM CST up reply actions  

It's early yet.

I hear what you’re saying Tsudsy and I respect you for trying to be big about this but I’m having a tough time with it. After witnessing a repeated and massive superiority complex with this particular person you’ll forgive my skepticism if I’m not quite ready to believe he’s turned a corner. This was the guy that thought he was so awesome and so unappreciated here that he was going to start his own blog. Now he’s crept back in, trying to play nice, without so much as a “Hey fellas, sorry about that,” (unless I missed that post) to the writers of this blog that he maligned each and every day he posted here. The same guys that built this site from nothing and pour their passion, blood, sweat, and love of the game into it’s electronic pages each and every day. Now this guy is like George Costanza coming back to work after being fired and pretending like nothing happened. I just don’t trust him. I’m not going to let him off that easy. If he wants to come back and be a normal contributing member of this blog then he should be expecting a bit of “winning people over time.” I’m hoping he proves me wrong but I’d be lying to say that I’m happy to see him back here.

I had some neighbors that had no concept of how to respect other people until the apartment complex started the eviction process. My neighbors got real quiet all of a sudden and the apartment backed off. Over the next couple weeks our neighbors got louder and louder and we were right back where we started. Maybe he’s not like my neighbors. Time will tell I suppose. Until then, he’s still digging out as far as I’m concerned.

Joseph: "You mean this wet paper bag filled with dog droppings? But why would anyone want this? I inherited it, and it has been my curse to bear."
Anita Shero: "Ay, I'll take it with the heavy axe for my forgotten shield."
Joseph: "O happy day!" http://tinyurl.com/4pxt6mu

by EagleBelf on Mar 10, 2011 10:30 AM CST up reply actions  

lol fair enough....

just make sure you don’t provoke anyone in the process. if you make someone think “well, they’re going to hate me no matter what I say,” they’ll usually start doing whatever they want with no concern for politeness.

I think this post is a good step in the right direction. And like you said, hopefully he’ll prove you wrong!

I’ve been on the wrong side of things before, and it can be rough to come back and try and start fresh. This is an awesome community, and their aren’t many like it. Especially one about hockey. ESPECIALLY one about Dallas Stars hockey! This is an awesome place to be involved in, there’s no doubt about it. And as long as everyone stays respectful, i have no issues with welcoming people back. (Though, admittedly, i tensed up when i first saw there was a blog post.) But I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt here, and shake the etch-a-sketch clean. I find it to be much less stressful this way too :-)

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 10, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL I appreciate your emmense reservoir of grace.

You are a gentleman and a scholar. I respect your decision to extend the hand of understanding in hopes there isn’t a joy buzzer waiting for you. I have also been on the wrong side of things many times. As noted previously I have a tendency to be overly sarcastic and I can come off a bit harsh. I’m trying to be better about that. However, when I’m being a jerk and someone calls me out on it I apologize. I don’t find eight different ways to tell people how awesome I am… … …wait… … …that’s me being harsh again. Anywho If he decides to discard this new found affability because I’m not ready to kill the fatted calf and embrace him like the prodigal son, well that’s his choice. I’m not going to lose any sleep over it.

You’re right though this is certainly a special and awesome place. I have a profound respect for the fans that choose to come here and discuss what’s going on and I try to treat them respectfully. Since I don’t live in Dallas I don’t know any Stars fans to talk about this stuff with. So this has been a great outlet for me and I’m very appreciative for the opportunity. I like the idea that we can have reasonable discussions and agree to disagree without criticizing the writers of this blog for having an… … …Crap, there I go again. I’m harsh because I care. :) I know sometimes I may be a little tougher than some on things and people but I try to make concise arguments and back up what I say. Hopefully people see that and respect me for it even when they disagree with my method. Anyway, if I was going to have this discussion I’m glad it was with you. I did hear what you said though. Thanks for the encouragement. I’ll try to go a little easier moving forward… … …starting… … …right now.

Joseph: "You mean this wet paper bag filled with dog droppings? But why would anyone want this? I inherited it, and it has been my curse to bear."
Anita Shero: "Ay, I'll take it with the heavy axe for my forgotten shield."
Joseph: "O happy day!" http://tinyurl.com/4pxt6mu

by EagleBelf on Mar 10, 2011 12:18 PM CST up reply actions  

*Group hug*

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 10, 2011 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Hug it out.

Joseph: "You mean this wet paper bag filled with dog droppings? But why would anyone want this? I inherited it, and it has been my curse to bear."
Anita Shero: "Ay, I'll take it with the heavy axe for my forgotten shield."
Joseph: "O happy day!" http://tinyurl.com/4pxt6mu

by EagleBelf on Mar 10, 2011 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Joining group hug

I’m trying to be less abrasive…but I understand if you’re still skeptical.

Benn played another great game last night. And Richards is still finding his timing and legs. Another rough start and amazing comeback.

No worries. The Stars are headed in right direction and are going to fight for the 4th seed…go get em stars!

by 5starpuckism on Mar 10, 2011 2:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Good points - both of yas

Don’t get me wrong. I’d LOVE to get Brad back and see what this team is capable once everyone is healthy.

And K9mike, you’re right about Adam. He brings a lot of heart and grit, not to mention just good smart play to the team. Adam will be even more valuable in the playoffs.

by 5starpuckism on Mar 8, 2011 11:28 AM CST reply actions  

If we could only keep one of them at the end of the season

I would obviously pick Benn, no brainer, but to say Benn’s better than Richards is a little bit of a stretch still for me

by Why on Mar 8, 2011 1:47 PM CST reply actions  

I don't mean to say

That Benn is “better than” Richards. They are both extremely skilled players with different skill sets. Richards has proven himself and deserves to be mentioned among the elite centers in the NHL. While Benn is just now coming into his own and still has alot to prove as a young player.

But the greater negative impact that is apparent when Benn is off the ice compared to the absence of Richards raises the question at least of which player really is the MVP of this team. (more valuable does not necessarily mean better player)

by 5starpuckism on Mar 8, 2011 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know if he's MVP, but he's definitely MVFP.

Most valuable future potential.

It’ll be awesome to see if he keeps this kind of development over the next couple seasons.

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 8, 2011 5:20 PM CST up reply actions  

It's still Richards

You’ve watched Jamie be amazing over these last few games without Richards and see them actually winning, and you assume it’s just Jamie carrying them, while he’s been amazing, Richards is still much more proven.

Jamie’s probably going to be a better overall player than Richards eventually, especially in goal scoring, physicality, and the defensive side of things

by Why on Mar 8, 2011 8:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Good point

I won’t go as far as to say Benn has carried them while Richards has been out…but it sure is damn close. Benn’s been logging double shifts and playing on special teams. That’s pretty close to carrying a team.

by 5starpuckism on Mar 9, 2011 3:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I could have sworn that you left.

Don’t you have your own website/blog now?

How’s that workin’ out for ya?

Joseph: "You mean this wet paper bag filled with dog droppings? But why would anyone want this? I inherited it, and it has been my curse to bear."
Anita Shero: "Ay, I'll take it with the heavy axe for my forgotten shield."
Joseph: "O happy day!" http://tinyurl.com/4pxt6mu

by EagleBelf on Mar 8, 2011 1:58 PM CST reply actions  

Uh, Richards is.

If Benn continues to perform like this for an extended period of time, then I’ll accept the argument (even if I don’t agree), but I can’t look at this small sample of awesomeness from Benn and say it makes him more valuable than Richards. The games from November and December count too, and Richards contribution to that shouldn’t be forgotten. And I think his contribution when he comes back (crosses fingers that it’s not “if”) will be greater too, I hope in the sense that a 1 billion dollars is more than $999 million.

by Giant Space Ants on Mar 8, 2011 7:26 PM CST reply actions  

Fair assessment

I think a longer sample would be more convincing…but let’s hope it’s not much longer before Richards is back…but I’ve got a weird feeling Richards may be done for the season…I hope I’m wrong.

by 5starpuckism on Mar 9, 2011 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeeeeehaaaa!

Just saw Brad’s update about Richards coming back possibly tonight! SO glad I was wrong about his injury!

by 5starpuckism on Mar 9, 2011 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

This is really a tough one, but from an overall standpoint, I'd lean towards Benn.

Jamie is more of a fire-starter than Brad is. He can change the game in an instant. Steal a puck, stash a breakaway, bust Iginla’s face open. He’s a menace to the other team and you have to be paying attention to him every second that he’s on the ice. You blink once and he’ll have stolen the puck and be three strides beyond you before you even realize what happened (see Doughty, Drew) and like you said, the way he plays the game infects those around him and inspires them to up their commitment level. He goes all-out, non-stop. He’s an x-factor.

by Travis Drybread on Mar 9, 2011 8:42 AM CST reply actions  

This isn't a question you can ask yet

Yes, Benn has done an insanely awesome job over the last two weeks and is no doubt the MVP of said time period. However, he hasn’t been this dominant over the course of the entire season, nor can he be. It doesn’t matter that he’s still 21, you can’t play a forward at that level of TOI over an 82 game schedule. They’re gonna get tired and production will fall off, as will the dominance he’s displayed.

Benn is the 5th leading scorer on the team, and would likely be the 6th if Neal were still here. We all know that Richie is the top man. He is still leading in points, despite his time gone, and was leading in goal scoring before he got hurt. He’s a plus 4, vs Benn’s minus 4, on +/-. He runs the PP, which is nearly useless without him, and just makes the people he plays with better than they would be without him. I can’t say I’ve noticed the people playing along side Benn being better than they normally are. When you notice Benn, you notice Benn. When you notice Richards, you notice his entire line. Beyond all of that, he’s been the leader in the production department all season long. Richie is MVP, hands down.

Maybe as soon as next year Benn will start making a case for this, but not yet. He’s gonna have to produce at the level he has the last two weeks on less ice team over the course of a full season before he’s on the same level as Richards.

by PSyCo2012 on Mar 9, 2011 7:37 PM CST reply actions  

I'm really not trying to compare their skill sets or "level of play"

I’m really looking at their value to the team as a whole. There is a distinction there I think. Yes, Benn has a lot to prove over the long haul. But even early in the season, Benn has demonstrated his ability to fire up his teammates (by tanaciously hounding the puck, getting in someone’s face, making a huge hit, or actually dropping the gloves). And that’s in addition to the fact that Benn can flat out score! His play is simply infectious. Richards makes everyone better by his passing and smart shot decisions. But he lacks when it comes to….ok hold on to your hats……the intangibles.

by 5starpuckism on Mar 10, 2011 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

You can definitely see what Benn brings in terms of intangibles (lol), no doubt about that.

At the rate things are going, there’s no question that Benn could mean way more to this team than Richards does. But right now, I think the team as a whole looks to Richards as the leader on the ice, and they look to Morrow as the leader of the team. It’s highly possible that in a couple of years, they could look to Benn as the leader of both.

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 10, 2011 3:15 PM CST up reply actions  

the worst part is......

Richards is pulling in around $8 million per season and Benn less than $1 million. We know Richards is up for a new contract after this season, so I think Joe N. is weighing that into the equation down the road when Benn’s contract comes up. With the current ownership situation, I don’t see where Dallas can keep it’s current roster. If Richards and Benn stay on, then who must go?
Ribeiro – $5 million
Morrow – $4 million
Lehtonen, Robidas, Eriksson, langenbrunner, ott all make over $2 million per season

by Cajun_Kowboy_ on Mar 10, 2011 3:26 PM CST reply actions  

Benn won't earn anywhere close to $8 million on his next contract.

You have to establish youself for a good while before you earn something that lucrative. $4-5? Yeah, I can see that. $7-8? Definitely not. Richards will probably come down a bit on his price tag too, somewhere around 6.5M or so. And with new ownership willing to spend anywhere closer to the cap than closer to the floor, and it’ll be easy enough to maintain the roster we have.

"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards

by Tsudbury on Mar 10, 2011 4:35 PM CST up reply actions  

The problem with ^ is....

We don’t have new ownership yet, so we don’t know what they are willing to spend. I can tell you that ticket prices are coming down again for next season and the barn isn’t getting filled now, so increased revenue from ticket sales will be nill. Just looking at the future and only Benn’s next raise of say $3 mill per, you have to put 15,000 butts in seats each game and charge an extra $5 per ticket just to pay his salary.

by Cajun_Kowboy_ on Mar 11, 2011 8:03 AM CST up reply actions  

yeah benn's first real money contract

wont even be close to 8
and pretty much evrything he said^

GET OFF NIEUWENDYK'S NUTS

by 8thegreat on Mar 10, 2011 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry, but I'm gonna kneejerk, and it's not even difficult

Jamie Benn.

I’m not giving this up as an excuse that Dallas ownership can use, like “well we were okay letting Richards go because we have Benn,” because that’s unacceptable. You need a top line center to win in the NHL. If they let Richards go, they will not find another one, and the Stars will be like Columbus just looking for a top line center for years and years and never finding one. So it’s not excuse, but I personally think Benn is already better than Loui Eriksson, and that he’ll be better than Richards soon too. He is one of the best 21 year olds I have ever seen (and I am in some ways a neutral, not even solely a Dallas Stars fan), and I mean, most players have weaknesses. If Brayden Schenn turns out exactly like L.A hopes in his prime, he’ll be like Jamie Benn is now at age 21, except Jamie Benn is faster, bigger, better with the puck, a better passer, and 100x more explosive. I think he has the potential to be one of the best 2way players of all-time. He just amazes me. People started comparing Dallas’ top 6 group to Anaheim’s earlier this season, and I’m not sure I would trade Benn for any of Anaheim’s forwards. You think to yourself, maybe Perry with the season he’s having, maybe Getzlaf given that he’s one of the most dominant combinations of size, balance, puck-handling, and passing in the NHL, but I don’t think I’d trade him for any of them. He is certainly the most underrated player in the NHL right now, not Eriksson. It sucks he was available in my fantasy hockey league, and I picked him up, had him for a couple weeks (his worst off weeks of the entire season), so although I always loved the player, I was just like, he hasn’t been producing, there are people producing at a better pace than him, and I dropped him… Now he’s like a top 10 pick. Anyway fantasy hockey aside, this is the key player on the team. I think you have to keep Richards if you ever want to win anything, but he is the most important player for this team, for this franchise. He is the #1 guy you keep above everyone else. You never lose him. Like I touched in when I mentioned Brayden Schenn, there are so few players that just have everything. I mean even Ovechkin, with the size, speed, skill, (everything, right?), there are some holes, some weaknesses, some game sense stuff… He’s not as good on the cycle, or when the game-pace is slower and he can’t create as much on the rush, etc. Benn can do some things and create in some situations he can’t. Benn just has the whole package. It’s very rare to find a player like that. Obviously Crosby is the #1 example. Benn is just amazing. I love watching him. I love this team’s forwards.

I mean, comparing to San Jose, can you imagine if thsi team could just spend to the cap? With Benn, Richards, Eriksson, Morrow, Ribeiro, Langenbrunner, then Robidas, Goligoski, Daley, Grossman, if Niewendyk could just fill out the roster, you know. All the big pieces are there. The hard part is over. It’s a similar situation to Anaheim. Between Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry, Selanne, even Koivu, Blake, and then Visnovsky, Lydman, Fowler, and Sbisa, if Bob Murray had just built even half-decent bottom lines and a half-decent bottom DPair, that team would be one of the best teams in the league, and if he actually did a good job with the bottom lines and bottom dpair, it would be a dynasty. I mean you have Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry all on cap hits under 6 million, Lydman, a +/- leader at 3 mil, Fowler on an entry level deal, Koivu at 2.5 mil, Selanne at under 4, and most of these guys are locked in. You have all the hard-to-get pieces. There are so many teams with all these good role players who can never find a top line center or top line player, period, or top offensive defenseman. Anaheim has done all the hard stuff. They are set. All Murray has to do is the easy stuff, and they are set. It’s actually kind of sad to see like, how anyone could easily make that team into a dynasty now that all the hard work has been done (getting the elite players and locking them up to fantastic team-friendly contrasts).

Anyway, Dallas is the same. Mark Fistric? Karlis Skrastins? Who?? Sutherby, Barch, Jason Williams…

If you just replaced the spare parts with even just good-not-great value players, this is the best team in the league. I mean just look at like the waiver pickups and people who were traded for picks, or mid-money free agents.

Benn – Richards – Eriksson
Langenbrunner – Ribeiro – Morrow
Vincour – Adam Burish – Tom Wandell
Ben Eager – Chris Kelly – Kyle Wellwood

Alex Goligoski – Stephane Robidas
Trevor Daley – Nicklas Grossman
Chris Campoli – I don’t know…

It’s hard to do it just with the deadline and waiver pickups I remember. But from free agency last year, if you could just spend another 3+ million, you can have Tony Lydman too. Goligoski, Robidas, Daley, Grossman, Campoli (or Ian White or whoever at the deadline), Lydman (not necessarily in that order), that’s just night and day vs having Fistric and Skrastins. Those two are like the gaping hole in this team, the weakest link. I wish Nieuwendyk did something about that because I think it’s going to be the team’s undoing, along with not having a very good bottom forward lines identity or scoring.

Anyway, I think the hard part for this team is done. Maybe another top 6 forward, like a Matt Cullen would have been fantastic just as somewhere who could play and contribute anywhere, but mostly it’s just the bottom 6 forwards and the bottom 2 dmen that need to be fixed, and that’s the easiest part, and this team could be the best team in the league. Unfortunately it just seems like these GMs dont understand these simple things. I mean Bob Murray should have the best team in the league right now. Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry, for 16~ mil or so? Are you kidding me? But Selanne’s production is so important to that team too, and by the time Murray figures it out, he won’t be as good, neither will Koivu. They obviously need an upgrade on their 2nd line too. I mean Koivu and Blake would be a hell of a 3rd line, but they should be a hell of a third line, not a decent 2nd one. But still. I could turn that team into a dynasty in one offseason. Anyone could. I mean I mentioned Matt Cullen, for 3 mil he’s another steal. Replace Lilja (and maybe Sutton) with just about anyone… They need a Manny Malhotra type on their 3rd or 4th line especially for faceoffs. I don’t know. They should be way better but Bob Murray is sleeping on the job. Nieuwendyk at least has the ownership excuse, although he still should have been able to do way, way better than Fistric, Skrastins, Williams, Barch, etc. It’s just disappointing when it feels like potential squandered. The league is wide open right now and the Stars could easily win a Cup if it weren’t for the laziness or whatever on Nieuwendyk’s part. This team was not just one depth move away from the Cup when he traded for Langenbrunner, or one Neal/Goligoski swap-out. He could have won the Cup this year but he didn’t do enough. Now like SJ or someone will win it because they’re just overrun with two-way guys. They could have stuck with Jamie Mcginn, who was perfectly acceptable on that 4th line, but they added Eager anyway. They have like 50 centers, but they added Wellwood anyway. There is no shyness there like there is with Nieuwendyk. And Eager and Wellwood especially would have been fantastic, cheap additions for the Stars. Who can’t use a 52% faceoff man who can also play wing, can skate, is agile, is a great passer, reads the game very well, and is defensively responsible? He would have been perfect for the Stars, minus the lack of grit. But everything else is there for a 3rd or 4th line center. Eager brings some more grit, can back up Ott, and he can also move very well. It’s the little things like sitting on your hands while you’re biggest rival adds these important depth guys that decides who wins and who goes home ultimately.

by Kingofthefans...air fans on Mar 16, 2011 5:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba