Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Notes from Last Night's OT Loss to the Ducks

Yesterday as pre-game primer, I listed five things to look for in last night's game. We're going to take a brief look at how it all stacked up and a few other observations.

"1. Dallas needs to stay out of the box." How'd they do? Well, they kept the number of trips to a minimum but they gave up 2 power play goals including the game winner.

"2. Loui Eriksson is hot." He continued to be last night with a goal but was also a -1 on a play which I go over in my observations after the jump.

"3. Dan Ellis and Kari Lehtonen are hot as well." Neither did themselves any favors posting .862 and .855 save percentages respectively.

"3A. Be on the look out for Brad Winchester." More about that in my observations, too.

"4. Jamie Benn's TOI." The youngster logged 22:57; second only to the defensive pair of Stephane Robidas and Alex Goligoski. He also managed to score a goal and stay plus-1. 

"5. Cam Fowler." The rookie led the team in ice time (25:38) and was a plus-1. He was noticeable... but I didn't take any notes on him. If Anaheim can ride him and not break him, he's got a heck of a future. He looks like the next Chris Pronger minus the high elbows.

Star-divide

Just briefly going through some of my observations of last night's game. Like I mentioned above, I thought for sure Anaheim would be as abrasive as they are capable of being from the drop of the puck but remarkably played a very docile game through the first two periods. Mark Fistric did what he could to add some spice to the game by dropping Winchester a couple of times on the same shift.

Brad Winchester, however, was (until the third period) the only player adding sand to the vaseline of the game on behalf of the Ducks. Then in the third, Anaheim coach Randy Carlyle put Winchester up with Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry and on the first shift of the period did exactly what they wanted - dictate the play of the game, get a shot on goal and start rubbing people. It really was all downhill from there.

Winchester also drew a call in the third and later wins a nice penalty trade putting him in the box along with Benn (who probably needed the rest). Were it not for Lubomir Visnovsky's hat trick, Winchester would have been one of the stars of the game. 

What would last night's game be however without some discussion of the game called by the referees. Personally, I believe referees have nothing to do with a team's ability to kill penalties but the first call on Steve Ott barely 4 1/2 minutes in was weak. But more than that, how in the name of all that is hockey-holy was that not charging when Winchester hit Jamie Langenbrunner? He literally flew from the opposite side of the ice and elbowed Langenbrunner in the head.

Where was the tripping call when Perry intentionally trips Robidas and the unsportsmanlike call when Bobby Ryan literally kicks him?

Where were the interference calls on Winchester when he sets a monster pick behind the net in the second period and on Getzlaf on Visnovsky's second goal?

It wasn't all Brad Winchester and non-calls. Kari Lehtonen needs to learn some rebound control and how to take a shot in the belly. Too many time last night as well as throughout the season, he will push a rebound right out into the slot or the weak-side and too many times does he fight a puck that should be absorbed.

Louis Eriksson did score a goal but was totally sucked-in on Visnovsky's first goal. He got to watching the puck and realizing it Visnovsky slides down, receives the puck and with plenty of room, walks it right into the slot with Eriksson, who'd lost him, spinning like a bubble-hockey player. Dan Sexton slides down and sets a perfect screen.

Eriksson though also made one heck of a defensive play. Having lost his stick (broken as I recall) Anaheim is pressing and the puck comes out to the point to Visnovsky - Eriksson goes flying in and Visnovsky, possibly not realizing it was a stick-less Eriksson, feels the pressure and fumbles the puck out of the zone.

One thing the listeners might have missed last night was Razor's "Tim McCarver" moment with something to the effect of, "As good as the Stars were against Phoenix, that's how bad they've been here tonight."

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Maybe it was just past their bedtimes

Led to my question earlier, why isn’t Segal back up with the big club? Crawford loves Barch, but he cannot hold anybody accountable and probably will remain that way until the end of the regular season. It is a little late in the season for our other sandpaper players to drop the mitts with the pugilists. The liberties taken, especially the charge/elbow against Langenbrunner were attributable to the fact that the Ducks dished and the Stars took it. One observation that Razor made was very interesting; Fistric lays out his big hits early in games to set tone. Maybe if he punished guys in all phases of the game, perhaps he will get more than 13 minutes of ice time.

Some people live an entire lifetime wondering if they have made a difference, Marines don't have that problem - Ronald Reagan

by bluliner10 on Mar 5, 2011 8:24 PM CST reply actions  

In my opinion

Some of this goes back to my opinion on Crawford’s inability to use his players to their potential.

by Russell Davis on Mar 5, 2011 8:30 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Perhaps

They have not demonstrated an ability to hold a lead, they play that very soft defensive scheme, sticks and bodies in the lanes rather than challenging and taking away time and space. But they are more effective when they are pushing the play. It is one of the reasons they are the best teams at playing from behind. They need to keep pushing regardless if they are down 2 or up 5, it is when they are their best and most effective. That may be on Crow, that may be on themselves but that zone defense run the clock out game is NOT going to take them to the second season.

Some people live an entire lifetime wondering if they have made a difference, Marines don't have that problem - Ronald Reagan

by bluliner10 on Mar 5, 2011 9:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Fowler

The next Pronger? The two players have completely different styles of play, not to mention the fact that Pronger probably has 4 inches of height and 50 pounds on Fowler.

If you must compare Cam Fowler to a former Ducks defenseman, the more apt comparison would be Scott Neidermayer.

by disposablehero on Mar 6, 2011 11:31 AM CST reply actions  

If you say so.

But he reminds me of Pronger. As for his height; “minus the high elbows.”

by Russell Davis on Mar 7, 2011 8:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

Managing Editors

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

100_0353_small Tsudbury

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

317075_10150847392930195_672210194_21620161_1404425884_n_small Huw Wales

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Moderators

Avatar_small RyanM

Lolastros_small DFWTrojanTuba