Dallas Stars Sale: Conflicting Reports on Doug Miller Offer
Remember when we said that the distractions were over for Dallas Stars fans and we could all focus our attention on what's happening in the playoff race, like Jamie Benn goals with 4.8 seconds left?
Yeah, well...maybe not. That's OK, though. This is a better kind of distraction.
The often ignominious Ken Campbell of The Hockey News (at least where the sale of the Stars is concerned) wrote a report on Monday morning stating that Doug Miller, owner of the Allen Americans had made an offer for the Stars. Mike Heika said he thought the the report was accurate. That was good enough for us.
Mr. Heika reiterated that fact this morning in another piece about Miller and the endless complications facing one who wishes to purchase this team...
Sources are saying he already is trying to negotiate offers and counter-ofers for his ``first'' bid, and that he is aware that the lenders will shop that bid to other groups. They also say that the Greenberg/Ryan group was the stalking horse, and that they eventually got the Rangers.
But now the Globe and Mail has entered the fray and their sources say that Doug Miller has not made an offer to purchase the Dallas Stars. They are also quite adamant that the number of interested parties is four.
There are four groups looking at buying the Stars, according to the source. Only three groups have been identified. Aside from Miller there is Vancouver businessman Tom Gaglardi and Billy Quinn, another Dallas oil-and-gas man who is a minority partner in the group led by Chuck Greenberg and Nolan Ryan that bought the Rangers.
Gary Bettman said recently there were "a half dozen" interested parties, and we've recently heard "6 or 7" elsewhere. Some places say Bill Gallacher pulled out and now is back in. Others say he is nowhere near this thing.
So it appears as though a variety of sources are starting to "leak" the information that they want out there and a variety of media outlets are being used in that process, creating these conflicting details about an already clouded situation. (By the way, if anyone wants us to push their agenda, email me...I kid)
What should a Stars fan take from all of this?
What should we take from this? And some might even ask, should we even care about this right now?
First, yes we should care. The Stars might make the playoffs this season. They might re-sign Brad Richards. A lot of things might happen, but unless they actually win the Stanley Cup, the sale of this team is the single most important thing that will take place in 2011. So our ears are perked and we're listening intently, even if the information is nebulous, conflicting and confusing.
One thing we can believe, because it appears to be the only consistent detail from report to report, is that the lenders are looking for something in the neighborhood of $225 million. I believe that is the ballpark figure on what they would like from the first bid and then ideally it would go up from there if bidding ever ensues.
Will anyone pay that much for a team they're sure to lose money on in at least the first few years? The lenders seem to be efforting to create a situation in which the only way the team can be bought is if someone makes a questionable business decision and overpays. Then we have an owner whose first action with the club was a financially irresponsible one. Mike Heika believes all the involved parties are smart and successful businessmen so I see this is as unlikely, but it's something to kick around while we wait.
Whether there are six buyers or four buyers or seven buyers, and whether or not Mr. Miller has made an official first bid or not, the one thing we can take from all this right now is the timing. The trade deadline and the Brad Richards situation goes hand in hand with this and it's just good old fashioned common sense that anyone interested in buying this team is interested in keeping Brad Richards.
The business model that makes money on hockey in Texas is simple, and it is singular: Winning. There is no other possible way. This isn't Edmonton.
If you want to make money, you need to win. If you want to win, and you want to do it without tearing the thing down and building it back up, you need Brad Richards. Thus the need to get the ball rolling right now.
So all this "he said, she said" stuff going on in the press is hopefully posturing for a situation that is getting ready to get very serious, very soon. That's what I'm taking from this. Things are happening.
Will it be in time to get financing in place and bid for Richards on July 1st? It's going to come down to the wire. Get ready for four months of this.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Isn't it also possible that the Globe and Mail has its own agenda?
You know how they salivate over supposedly failed Southern markets.
Anything is possible.
As I said, I think all of these media outlets have different people whispering to them and those folks all have an agenda, or are getting their information from yet another party who has an agenda.
by Brad Gardner on Mar 2, 2011 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
Yes
That’s exactly what I think with every Globe article I read. Over the past couple of years, in my opinion, they’ve managed to degrade themselves into nothing but a gloried version of the Toronto Sun. Their continual reporting of falsified “facts” and twisted truths has gotten to the point where I can’t even get through half an article without closing the window.
Perhaps my views are based on isolated incidents between a handful of reporters, but two years of it is generally a large enough sample size, in my mind.
Either or, I’m just hoping there are enough interested parties that our boys get sold prior to July 1.
who says they'll lose money...
with the looming NFL and NBA lockouts that only leaves 2 major leagues for people to attend, the NHL and MLB. If the NHL plays their cards right, this could be a HUGE time to build the game and gain new fans.
If the Stars make the playoffs. If they can make a push and at least get to the WCF. If they can get a new owner in place. If they can re-sign Richards. If they can get the good marketing. There is a very good chance that they could very well MAKE money next season. Without Cowboys and Mavs games to go to, people are going to be wanting to get their sports fix somewhere. Hopefully that somewhere is the Stars.
@rossssss
they don't ALL need to happen...
I just think the one major thing regardless of who the owner is, is that they need to market the shit out of the Stars (and the NHL doing the same as a whole)
This is a perfect storm. People spend a year of watching hockey that wouldn’t normally be watching hockey. Some of them are bound to stick around in years to come.
@rossssss
http://www.last.fm/user/ROSSSSSS
by Ross Phillips on Mar 2, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
I tend to agree with ya on this one...
Regardless of who’s got the real report and who doesn’t (or some mix therein), the fact is that it looks like both sides are starting to make some moves, and are beginning to use the press to postulate. Definitely a good sign. Doesn’t mean a new owner is right around the corner, but it means that things are beginning to move again.
And I doubly believe it’s because Joe didn’t trade Brad at the deadline. Like you said, any new owner is going to want to keep him around. And I don’t think that they were going to spend they’re time trying to purchase a team that would have entered some form of “rebuilding” had we given up Richards for a few picks, like some people thought we should have.
"I’m going on record that he read it wrong. We’ll see who’s right." - Hull Fan, in regards to Joe not trading Richards
I can't believe I'm thinking this...
But Mark Cuban is the only real possibility for the Stars going forward. I don’t think “losing money” is even in his vocabulary. The opportunity for all the barn revenues, economy of scale, and a “will do” attitude make him the guy who can “afford” to overpay.
Anyway, just the thought of Bettman’s antacid bill and seeing if he can pucker that sourpuss any more is almost as entertaining as a Coyote killing, Jamie Benn laser…almost..
I like Cuban
because I don’t think “losing” is in his vocabulary. He may not know much about hockey, or how to run a team, but I think he understands the concept of “what you pay for is what you get,” and so would be willing to spend to put a winning team on the ice. Not mention his personality would do some marketing all by itself, regardless of whether or not you like him. I also believe that once someone understands hockey on more than the “well you’re supposed to put the puck in the net” level, they’re hooked. If he becomes interested enough to learn the game, I would imagine he would bring all that polarizing passion of his to the Stars as well.
I'd take Cuban...
just for the fact that he wouldn’t be afraid to tell Bettman that he is an idiot is amazing.
I feel like once you are boo-ed in EVERY city you visit, you should probably get the hint that nobody likes you.
@rossssss
http://www.last.fm/user/ROSSSSSS
by Ross Phillips on Mar 2, 2011 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
Rangers drama
ALL over again, not sure if i can stomach it. even they there are actual offers, it will drag on and on.
my two favorite sports teams in the area dont deserve this.
Tony Tavares is the one who said that there were 6-7 buyers interested at the Stars' Luncheon on 8 Feb.
He had 6 firm interested (no names) that he spoke of that day, and he was going to have a phone call with #7 that afternoon.
TracyJean1972: YouTube channel
@TracyJean: Twitter account
I think the globe & mail is just mad at the dig Joe made about the Toronto media
on hiatus until further notice or the Stars clinch a playoff spot





























