Dallas Stars Ready For Kari Lehtonen To Return
What is perhaps most amazing about hockey and what makes us love this sport so much is how important nearly every single decision and outcome on the ice may be. While, for some, it seems like the game is mostly players passing the puck around and fighting for the puck along the boards, in reality it is those battles that truly define the game.
The ability of a team to excel at the small stuff; to win those battles, to cleanly complete their passes, to cash in on the rare prime scoring chance they receive -- that is what separates the top teams in the NHL from those at the bottom.
Against the St. Louis Blues on Monday night, the Stars were unable to win those small battles -- something that's happened at times this season, and something that is almost excusable considering the unfortunate travel situation the team was forced to go through before the game. Yet in an 82 game season, learning how to consistently be the team that excels at those details is what will ultimately mean making the postseason and going home early. It doesn't matter how talented your team might be, if the details are slipping by you're just not going to win. Ask the Washington Capitals about that one.
"It's small details, it's little things that make a big difference in the game," said Eric Nystrom, when asked specifically about the problems of the penalty kill. "It's an inch. You put your stick in one lane and it should be in the other, and that's where they get the puck moving from side to side. It's little things like that. Sometimes you are rock solid and kill 25 in a row, and then sometimes you feel like you can't stop it from going into the net. That's why it's a long season. But that's why we got to have a little more desperation."
The Stars certainly didn't have that desperation on Monday night and while they weren't grossly outplayed by the Blues -- in fact, I'd contend the game was closer than some are giving the Stars credit for -- the Stars weren't able to compete in the trenches well enough and unfortunately didn't receive the goaltending they needed to keep their heads above water.
With the Stars looking ahead to the likely return of Kari Lehtonen on Thursday night, there's a increasing feeling that it can't come soon enough...
It's tough to fault Richard Bachman for what's happened the past few games. After just one full season in the AHL, he was suddenly thrust into the temporary starter's job when Andrew Raycroft fell to pieces. Showing some freshness in net and catching the NHL a bit by storm, the team then put all of their weight onto his shoulders to the tune of eight straight starts over the course of two weeks. That's a tough burden for any NHL goaltender and for Bachman, perhaps Monday night was just the breaking point.
There's a thought he's been a bit overexposed at this point and perhaps overused, but the Stars uncertainty regarding Raycroft has meant that starting Bachman was almost a necessity. Even if the Stars are planning on keeping Bachman up as the full time backup once Lehtonen returns, there's still the thought that the Stars should have started Raycroft anyways on Monday.
Whatever the coaching decisions behind the scenes may be, there's no denying that Monday's loss to the Blues is one that Bachman will be taking a good portion of the blame for. This was a game when the Stars, shorthanded on defense and dealing with an idiotic travel schedule, needed their goaltender to be the best player on the ice. Fair or not, there are times when a team needs the goalie to make those big saves to make up for mistakes on the ice. Against the Blues, not only were those saves not made, but Bachman allowed a few goals that an NHL goaltender just should not allow.
"There's no question a couple of those goals he wishes he had back," said Glen Gulutzan. "Some nights when your goalie maybe isn't as good you've got to get it from somewhere else and we didn't get it from those other areas."
It's a symbiotic relationship between the team and the goaltender, when there are nights when the guys in front have to make up for an off night by the netminder. Unfortunately, this was one of those nights when everyone was off and it showed, especially with the penalty kill once again allowing two goals in a game.
Bachman is a steady goaltender with great mechanics and positioning, when he's fresh and on top of his game. After a roaring start to his NHL career, perhaps getting some time sitting on the bench will do him well -- especially if Lehtonen is the one back in net.
Since becoming the full time starter for this team last season, Lehtonen for the most part has been that goaltender with the ability to make up for the shortcomings of the team in front of him. He makes those big saves, making them look easy, that keeps the team in the game and makes up for the mistakes that are made in front of him. More importantly, Lehtonen rarely allows those demoralizing soft goals that have plagued the Stars at times over the past month -- something this team has trouble dealing with emotionally at times.
This wasn't just about the goaltending, however, and as mentioned at the top the Stars struggled at times with the details of the game. There's a trend now this season, that when this team is struggling they fail to move well without the puck -- not skating as hard on the backcheck or failing to put themselves in the right position when in the offensive zone. It's the simple but important things and it's the difference between a loss like the one to the Flyers, and the win against Nashville on Friday night.
"I think we got outbattled a little bit tonight. They seemed to have an extra step all night," said Alex Goligoski. "That's pretty much it. They came pretty hard and were able to establish their game better than we were ours."
The Stars will try to right the ship, once more, and gain the consistency they need to make a push for the postseason starting on Thursday. If Lehtonen does in fact return, then the Stars will be regaining most of their team healthy just in time for the New Year. The short term prognosis of Sheldon Souray and Stephane Robidas is unknown, but it appears that the Stars have fought through injury trouble early in the season and still remain in position to make a run for the playoffs.
Even with a healthy team and Lehtonen back, the Stars will need to find a way to correct their special teams issues. This has been the problem all season long and while the Stars had apparently fixed the penalty kill, that is suddenly a problem as well. The Stars aren't scoring on the power play and the penalty kill is struggling; certainly not the recipe for success for an undermanned team against an ultra-competitive Western Conference.
"Coming on the road against a good defensive club we needed to put more pucks on the net. Our specialty teams need to be better," said Gulutzan. "Our power play needs to be better. Their PK generated more shots than our power play and they scored two power play goals. It's hard to win on the road, especially against this type of club, if your specialty teams aren't good. "
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Even though hose 3 os wee the fault of Bachman, I don't really blame him.
He’s just a rookie goalie, and he’s had more start than he should have. But, given the circumstances, I still don’t know if I would have trusted Raycroft at any point in that stretch.
And the thing that ticks me off about the NHL travel policy is how it really goes against the travelling team. If you’re going to restrict any travel for a 2 day period, you can’t schedule a game on the day they have to fly like that. It’s ridiculous. Make it a 3 day break allow them to travel and rest on the third day, and let’s have some teams who are able to compete for games.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
keyboard fail... i thought I caught all of it. Subject should say "Even though 3 of those were the fault of Bachman"
For some reason, my wireless keyboard acts up from time to time, and literally misses half of what I type. I fixed all of it in the main part of the comment, but forgot to check the subject.
It’s extremely frustrating. Especially since this is a work keyboard, and it happens a lot when I’m working on things for clients.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Stop drinking
It’s time to get back to work
by Brad Gardner on Dec 27, 2011 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
I think I’d sent Bachman back, hes been pretty average since the rangers game…
by rayzorsharp on Dec 27, 2011 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
Raycroft should go down.
Bachman is 5-2-0
Raycroft is 2-8-0
Granted last night Crofty got the loss and maybe didn’t deserve it but still. Bachman hasn’t looked bad at all until last night. He’s had an off game as many goalies are subject to have every now and again. Just ask Raycroft. He’s had several bad games by comparison.
5-3-0 is still better than 2-7-0.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
He hasn't looked bad, but after his first 2, he didn't look great.
He looked like he should. A rookie goalie that will make some mistakes. He’s had a lot of goals scored on him due to his lack of positioning — something that comes with time.
Right now, I think the Stars need him as a backup. But it would be best for his career if he were sent back down to get some additional time.
It’s a tough call.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
He didn't look fantastic but that's not the question.
The question is, “Did he look better than Raycroft?” I think the answer is still “yes” even after last night. Besides, he’s got to come up sometime and when he does he will be a back-up. It may as well be for us. We need the chance to win those games when Kari needs a break and I just don’t trust Crofty to get it done anymore.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
agreed.
you and i feel the same way. i was just trying to look at both sides of the coin. i don’t think Joe’s decision will surprise me either way.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
I think Bachman has played better.
But contract and more important, team depth at keeper are on Raycrofts side. If it was me I would be talking to other GM’s to see if I could get something for Raycroft. If it came to sending someone down … I think it would be Bachman … maybe. I may change my mind it 2 minutes!
I think stability and wins are going to trump contract every time
I agree they should be shopping Raycroft but I don’t know there would be any takers. Contract issues or no, Bachman has been the more stable on a consistent netminder and he’s gotten the wins. The additional pay of Raycroft is something I think they’ll be willing to eat if it means making the post-season. I think if we’re trying to keep rolling toward a playoff berth we need the stability of Bachs on the games where you rest Kari. Crofty has been way too inconsistent to keep the job.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
I have to agree on Bachman staying.
Although isnt there a chance there may be some cap or money issues with sending Raycroft down? I don’t know a whole lot about how all of that works.
Obviously it may be better for Bachman’s development to keep him in the AHL longer but the team needs a more reliable backup then Raycroft.
We're well above the cap floor at this point.
Losing Raycroft’s salary (which is minimal anyways) won’t have any effect.
The bigger thing about trading him away is that if Kari gets hurt again, then your only options are Bachman and Besko as his backup. That might be a bit of a dangerous game to play.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
I'm not worried about Bachs with Besko pulling backup duties.
I don’t think it happens but if it did, Besko might get a handful of starts at best and they’d probably ride Bachs most of the time and then he’d get the experience you keep talking about. :) Besides you can’t think that way. You have to go with the guy that’s going to give you the best chance to win when he’s in net. IMHO that guy is Bachs over Crofty in every scenario. Kari is going to be back and he’s going to be fine. Bachman is young and this long stint has put him to the test. He’s not perfect but even when he hasn’t been great he’s still looked better than Raycroft. I know we pretty much already agree on this but it’s interesting to talk possible future scenarios. Even if the worst happened that way it’s still worth the risk. If Crofty gets picked up then more power to him. If not then we have our Bachs/Crofty tandem and we’re alright. If not then we have two rookies in net for the remainder of the season. Either way it would certainly be interesting.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
It's not just contract.
More important to me is depth. Esp with Kari’s recovery status unknown and his history with groin injuries. You send Raycroft down and it is unlikely we can get him back up if needed if there is another injury. He would likely make it through waivers, but I doubt he makes it back through re-entry waivers. If nothing else somebody below us would probably be willing to eat half his salary just to mess us up.
If Bachman goes down there are no issues in calling him back up if Kari has more injury issues. Or even if Raycroft totally caves with a few more chances you can always bring him up. I feel if we send Raycroft down our only remaining option if needed will be Barksowski (sp)
No one would have the chance to get him on re-entry waivers though.
If Kari got hurt again, then Raycroft would be recalled under emergency conditions, which bypasses all of the re-entry waiver drama. If he passes through waivers, he’ll be ours to keep for the rest of the season.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
Tsdusy is right that re-entry isn't an issue but the point is we just don't need Raycroft. Period.
We don’t need him to clear waivers or re-entry.The problem with keeping Raycroft is that you actually have to keep Raycroft’s inconsistent play along with it. I don’t trust him back there anymore and it doesn’t seem like the team does either. What good is a backup if he can’t be relied upon to pick up the consistent “W”? A good backup’s record should look something more like 5-2-0 and not 2-8-0. We need a backup that’s going to pick up points. I just don’t think Raycroft is that guy anymore.
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
No, but I'd rather have him as a back up to the back up, in case Kari gets injured again.
But since they didn’t play him at all in 8 games (except for the 3rd last night) maybe that argument is moot now.
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
See above reply. :D
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
I'm starting to think we're all talking for the sake of talking lol
"He punched the highlights out of her hair.... He punched the HIGHLIGHTS out of her hair!!!" -- Young Neil
We are. :D
That’s what makes us “superfans.”
"I know the last couple of years have been especially hard for Stars fans. To all of you: First let me say thank you for your patience and support, and please know that the uncertainty is now over." -- Tom Gaglardi
That was basically what I was thinking
but you are right about re-entry waivers being moot if Kari is injured. Salary issues are minor, esp now that we have an owner. Cap Floor is not an issue unless Avery gets sent down again. I can’t see anyone grabbing Raycroft on waivers, then again I don’t know what everyones injury issues are.
So I’m flip flopping and going with keeping Bach’s!
Keep the kid up.
The Stars are 12th out of 30 teams, which isn’t horrible at this point in the season considering all of the injuries they’ve had. Five wins for the rookie is solid, even if he didn’t always look spectacular.
Defending Big D's "Official" Western New York Representative

by 




























