Dallas Stars Season Grades: Brad Richards
Over the next month or so, we'll be grading each player that played a role for the Stars in the 2009-2010 season. At the end of each feature, you get to select the overall grade for each individual player. This is something we'll continue doing each season, and is a tool we can use to determine a player's progress year by year.
All stats used in this post courtesy of BehindTheNet.ca and NHL.com
Key Stat: Richards had the highest BTN rating on the power play (5.10) among Dallas Stars who averaged more than a minute of TOI on the power play.
The Good: Richards was by far the most productive offensive player on the Stars this season. His 91 points matched his previous career best (with Tampa Bay in '05-'06) and was seventh-best in the entire NHL. Other than staying healthy, the jump in points from last season had a lot to do with his emergence as a force on the point of the power play unit. Paired on the point with Matt Niskanen and Stephane Robidas, Richards led the team in PP TOI/G (5:04), power play goals (13) and power play assists (27). For some perspective, the next highest in each category was Mike Ribeiro (3:32 PP TOI/G), Brenden Morrow (9 power play goals), and Ribeiro again (15 power play assists). Richards 14 penalty minutes also got him nominated for a Lady Byng award. Richards saw his stats increase across the board, other than plus/minus.
The Bad: There is a huge disparity between his performance at home and his performance on the road. At home, Richards scored 55 points and was +7. On the road, Richards scored 36 points and was a putrid -19. A lot of this had to do with matchups - at home, the Stars got first change and could match Richards against more favorable lines. On the road, Richards often faced against the top lines. Among the total Stars losses, Richards was a -31. When the Stars won, Richards was +19. So it's safe to say that as Brad Richards went, so did the Stars offense. Luckily for the Stars, Richards didn't have many bad streaks.
The Bottom Line: Brad Richards was the best Dallas Star this season, hands down. His massive contributions to the power play and consistent point production kept the team in the playoff hunt all the way to the end of the season. There's no question that Richards stepped up and became a leader for this team on the ice. His brilliant, almost Jedi-like (yeah, I went there) vision on the ice led to great seasons by wingmates James Neal and Loui Eriksson. In fact, we saw just how influential Richards can be when Neal's play slowed after being removed from the top line. The worrisome thought for Stars fans is the idea that Richards might not be here much longer. Because he is a UFA after this season, the Stars will try to sign Richards to an extension as soon as the ownership situation clears up, or else trade him at the deadline. But it seems that Richards enjoys playing in Dallas, and both sides seem confident they can work something out. Stars fans know that this is a totally different team without Richards playing down the middle, and hope he can repeat his performance next year.
The Vote: Rate Richards below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
B-Rad was pretty awesome this season. Except for that pesky plus/minus. He’s always had problems with that, though. He hasn’t been a plus player since the lockout. It gives him something to work on next season.
Plus I liked his entertaining rebel impersonation this season. He seemed a bit meaner than he has in the past, yet he still managed to finsih second in Lady Byng voting! Is that talent or what?
Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.
by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Jul 11, 2010 3:17 PM CDT reply actions
he had a great season
but no one on the team deserves a 10. everyone was inconsistent and didn’t bring their best for multiple stretches of the year.
he deserves a 9 though cause this team would have been lottery-bound without him.
+/- was bad.
I still had to give 10. He came back, it’s that simple.
I hope Stars can keep him. It might not be easy, but one can still hope.
I also think that 10 is high and none of them players deserves it, but there it is anyway.
Brad was on the ice
for about 10-12 empty net goals which would tend to drag his +/- down quite a bit. I don’t remember the exact number of empty net goals.
I gave him a 10
The main reason being I thought he was the best Stars player this season. The 12 dosen’t bother me that much, considering the Stars only had two people above +3 and +/ can sometimes be a little misleading, i think Jeff Schultz had a +50 this season and thats because he played with guys like Green & Ovechkin. Also, i agree with mcgee, Brad was on the ice alot last season especially at the end of games, so that hurts his number a little bit.
hey everyone
Hope everyone is enjoying their summer. I just finished moving over to Dallas, thankfully thats over.
Anyways, anything less than a 10 or a 9 for Brad Richards is a joke. He finished the season 4th in the league in assists. In the top 14 for assists, only 2 of the guys weren’t on playoff teams. The other was Martin St. Louis, but he was feeding the guy who shared the Rocket Richard for most goals in the season. Richards didn’t have a 50 goal scorer he was playing with. Sure he had two almost 30 goal scorers, but neither were 50.
Also, if he had scored 0 goals, he still would have finished 2nd on the team in points, only 4 behind the leader. He might not of been perfect, but he helped the team in a way no one else did.
When reading quality hockey material isn't enough, The Black Green and Gold
Twitter @BlackGreenGold
Kent
I was thinking the same thing about anything less than a nine or 10. He was arguably the most confident looking Stars player on the ice all season! I gave him a nine because of the +/- rating, but now that I think about what everyone is saying about him being on the ice late in games for the empty net goals, that makes sense. Can I change it to 9.5? :P
by Tyler Bouldin on Jul 11, 2010 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I also don't like the +/-
but i think it is more indicative of the team and not solely Richards. Is he a great +/- player, no, but he is certainly better than his numbers indicate.
I gave him a 9
because he can be more responsible on backchecking and defense. Though he was probably as good in those areas as he has ever been last year, they are the areas to improve on. Also, though he was our best primary faceoff guy he can improve there. Again, probably his best year overall ever, and he absolutely makes his linemates better … but with areas for improvement and overall team performance I drop it to a 9.
I gave him a 9 because he could have been better on defense
but you can’t get much better than richards was on an average team last year.
"Diving stab by Andrus, gets up, throws.... GOT HIM!!! An unbelievable play! From short left field!"
-Eric Nadel on 5/17/10
I graded him a little harshly...
I gave him a 7, and the reason I did is because he performed about like I thought he should, and maybe a little bit better. He’s the highest paid player on our team, has the experience, and should be reaching close to 90 points a season every season. He’s an amazing player, and I’m glad he’s on out team, but we pay him the big bucks for a reason.
If the voting were based on how he met my expectations based on how much everyone else on the team let me down, it would be a 10 for sure.

by



















