Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

The Stars Select: Jack Campbell (1st Round, 11th Overall)

Meet the newest face of the Dallas Stars future?  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images)

Jack Campbell

Team: US National Development (USHL)
Born: Janurary 9, 1992
Hometown: Port Huron, Michigan
Height: 6' 3"
Weight: 175 pounds
Position: Goaltender
Catches: Left

Central Scouting rank:  2nd North American Goalies


  Lge GP W L T GAA SV %
2008-09 USN U18 NAHL 21 14 6 1 2.52 .906
2009-10 USNDT
USHL 11 6 3 1 2.21 .917

 

Star-divide

 

Why the Stars drafted him:

Because truth be told we don`t know if Kari Lehtonen is the answer to the question of "Who is the Stars goalie of the future ?" ... Jack will most certainly will be.  All Jack does is win and if anyone saw his performance at the World Juniors this past December / Janurary, you'll know Jack is maybe the most clutch goalie that tournament has seen in years.


Was this a good pick?

Well if the first ten picks hadn't gone the way they did with the likes of Cam Fowler and Brandon Gormley being available, this would have been considered a great pick.  Now though?  I suppose it depends on your opinion.  Did the Stars need a top elite defenseman or a top elite goalie more?  You can also make the argument that if the likes of Cam and Brandon fell down to the 11th spot when they were originally pegged to go in the top 5 or 7, maybe there are a bunch of GMs that know something we didn't...


A second opinion:

From TheScoutingReport.org ...

Campbell does have all the tools necessary to succeed in the NHL. His butterfly style allows him to take away the bottom of the net with his pads. He possesses a quick glove and blocker that stop pucks targeted for the upper corners. A particular strength is that Campbell's upper body remains upright when he butterflies and he has great balance. This is evident when you watch Campbell make a save and then instantly square up to the rebound. Campbell is very active in the crease as he is good at moving side to side as well as skating out to take away angles and quickly retreating back to the net.

Poll
Jack Campbell at 11th overall? Give this pick a grade:
A+
25 votes
A
52 votes
B
71 votes
C
27 votes
D
11 votes
F
29 votes

215 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hey Art

I write some articles about the Stars, and I was wondering if you would mind if I could link your profile of Campbell in one of my articles. I’m just linking it, not re-stating any of it. Thanks ahead of time

And as for the pick, I think Campbell looks solid. I mean Fowler or Gormley would have been nice too, but I’m more worried about them going to Anaheim/Pheionix. It would’ve been nice to see them in the East. But if Campbell happens to become what everyone thinks he has the potential to be, this could be a steal!

http://www.examiner.com/x-50872-Dallas-Stars-Examiner
^ Updated often. Check back often for articles :)

by MayurP on Jun 25, 2010 8:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Link away!

Campbell is a big game goalie and doesn’t crack under pressure. Seems like a great foundation for a superstar goalie to me!

Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
@GameTimeArt: Offending and/or boring sports fans one tweet at a time!

by Art Middleton on Jun 25, 2010 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

ok cool

Thanks!
And for sure about the big game goalie part. Beating Canada for the Gold Medal clearly shows it!

http://www.examiner.com/x-50872-Dallas-Stars-Examiner
^ Updated often. Check back often for articles :)

by MayurP on Jun 25, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not only that..

But how did Fowler and Gormly fall to 11?

Will they be standouts? Maybe… We may look at this five years from now and know what kind of mistake right now. But at the same time, there are about 7 other teams that could have picked those guys as well and felt better about other guys.

Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
@GameTimeArt: Offending and/or boring sports fans one tweet at a time!

by Art Middleton on Jun 25, 2010 8:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Some teams tried to get too cute

The Rangers failed miserably.

I think what most teams did was draft for need. Gormley may never be a #1 cornerstone type defender, but he’ll have a long career. Cam Fowler is going to be epic though. I like Campbell, but this is a head scratcher.

by Josh Lile on Jun 25, 2010 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've almost lost all confidence

In Nieuwy and Company. Last year they took Glennie over Kulikov, now they take Campbell over Fowler/Gormley….ridiculous.

by JCWM2 on Jun 25, 2010 8:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Glennie is a real good prospect

Kulikov was/is too, but it’s hard to fault them for that move.

by Josh Lile on Jun 25, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

He is a good player

But he seems to get injured at highly inconvenient times (not that injuries are ever convenient). I had no idea Kulikov would already be as good as he is, but the fact that I wanted him and he did turn out to be one of those players we never seem end up with in the draft, it still bothers me.

by JCWM2 on Jun 25, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like Kulikov a decent amount too.

He still has question marks though. He was solid as a rookie, but he might have barely cracked the top 10 list of rookies this season if at all. I think theres a decent chance Glennie still has a better career than Kulikov.

by Josh Lile on Jun 25, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope so...

I definitely wouldn’t be against Benn and Glennie doing some damage for years to come. And now that I’ve had time to digest it, I understand why they picked Campbell. I just REALLY hate the idea of taking a gamble on the most risky position when it comes to development.

by JCWM2 on Jun 26, 2010 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like the selection of Campbell...

but would like to know why 7 or so teams passed on the remaining top 2 d-men. Either something is agreed upon by scouts that we don’t know about or teams thought they would be gone well before their selection and forgot to put them on their boards haha.

by modano9 on Jun 25, 2010 8:18 PM CDT reply actions  

"All Jack does is win"

I never like when people describe a guy like that. Winning is not some quality that some players just happen to have more of than others- this is a team game after all. If anything, it sounds like grasping for something good to say.

As for the pick…I don’t get it. The Stars trade their best defensive prospect (whether that means much, I don’t know) for a goaltender meant to be in their net for a pretty good period of time. And then draft a goaltender when there were D-men on the board that were considered among the best in the draft, at a pick where they shouldn’t have been available. It’s pretty much a consensus that the Stars desperately need D in their system, and they turn that down.

Campbell may very well turn out great, and I’ll look stupid (nothing new to me), but they’re still stuck with a system that lacks D, and now have to put faith in Joe’s ability to trade for it, and frankly it’s up in the air as to whether he can do that adequately.

However, since Campbell was who the Stars drafted, I wish him the best of luck.

by Giant Space Ants on Jun 25, 2010 8:24 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll have my opinion...

When I see him in camp. I feel like Fowler/Gormley were passed on by other teams for a reason. And we can all say this team need defense til we’re blue in the face but we all know that the biggest question we have is in goal when you look at it a little closer.

by bigtill2002 on Jun 25, 2010 8:25 PM CDT reply actions  

And I also think.

Joe goes after a defenseman that’s already playing at this level. Drafting D is great, but you’re not gonna see it for about three years. The pressure is on him to win now and you just don’t do it by drafting somebody you’re not gonna see for a while.

by bigtill2002 on Jun 25, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have a question...

Does anyone know if there were issues with Fowler and Gormley that they fell so far? Like attitude issues, maybe? Because Fowler looked a little, well, foul.

BTW, I’m okay with the pick, but not completely sold on it. Campbell’s a good kid with excellent work ethic, so that’s nice. We’re stuck with him, so we just have to deal with it.

Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.

by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Jun 25, 2010 8:30 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

This is a great pick.

I think we all know that the most important position on the ice is a goalie, especially in the playoffs. I know they can’t do it all by themselves for an entire season but great goalies can steal big games by themselves. Furthermore, they’re way rarer than defensemen.

It’s also possible to acquire a top defenseman through a trade but proven franchise goalies are rarely moved. I understand that this off-season it’s happened but that’s a bit of an anomaly.

I really feel like Joe is gonna trade Ribiero for a defender or some picks that get us a defender. This draft is far from over. There’s still great talent out there.

Plus who says Nisky won’t be way better next year? Ok just kidding that’s pretty much a given.

by DFWFan on Jun 25, 2010 9:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Dallas trade?

Dallas really doesn’t appear to be a major player in trades now. We’re a “small-market” team until Hicks sells. They might dump salary but not to increase payroll – so if they dumped Ribiero it would have to be for picks or a couple of non-elite players. And yes, Ribiero is still elite.

It would be nice to have an owner that stays committed to the success of the team. But that’s a discussion for another page.

by bones_boy on Jun 25, 2010 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just curious...

…but if “Jack is maybe the most clutch goalie that tournament has seen in years” then it has to be a somewhat decent pick right? I mean we know the Stars are lacking in the G department (Kari is SUCH an unknown at this point) and the D department, but this would help in one of those departments. A goalie is far more important than a defenseman – there’s less of them on your bench. Plus it seems easier to get an elite D than an elite G.

Talk of a loon? Unintelligent loon? Perhaps. But at the very least you can’t grade this pick an “F”. That’s preposterous.

by bones_boy on Jun 25, 2010 9:30 PM CDT reply actions  

First post on here

mostly post over at LSB. As far as this goes….goalies can be dominant to a point, but the D in front of them need to do their job, otherwise goals will be scored. At this point, the Stars D is the reason they missed out on the playoffs and is clearly their biggest weakness. I would imagine Joe expects his biggest acquisition thus far, Lehtonen, to be his goalie for the next 5-10 years. If that truly is the case, than this pick makes zero sense. Defenseman are what we need, now and in the future.

by eric03tx on Jun 25, 2010 9:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Super de duper

The stars need an impact on Defense now, very few players who are drafted have that immediate impact in hockey. Cambell is a beast. The guy knows how to win, and while we might have a bottleneck at the position in a few years, I think we will find ourselves in a position like LA, where we can move someone at a premium.

I am still "FRISKY FOR NISKY"

by RealDealNeal on Jun 25, 2010 9:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Didn't matter who we drafted...

They aren’t going to be NHL ready for several years. Period. This “We need Defense now” argument has no validity for the draft. It does, however, have validity for a trade in the next week or so. I’ll be very disappointed in Joe if he doesn’t make a move sometime soon.

As far as drafting a goalie over a D-man is concerned, I’ll say exactly what I said before: Drafting a goalie honestly makes more sense. If you need a big d-man in the future, you can pick him up via trade or free agency without a problem. It may be expensive, but it won’t be a huge issue if you can fork over the dough (which we can in a few years). You CANNOT, however, pick up a #1 championship caliber goalie via trade or FA. No one ever lets their incredible goalie go.

I think the main reason why everyone is so upset is this… It looks like Joe is leaning towards a longer term, but more stable, rebuilding (3-5 years) than pushing for immediate patches to what we have. I think it just depresses people that we wont be seriously competitive next season. It sucks, but I think it’s the right path to winning the cup once again.

by Tsudbury on Jun 25, 2010 10:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Have to agree...

We probably aren’t going to be winning the Cup next year, regardless of who we take tonight. In that case, you have to take whoever you believe is going to be the best player over the course of their career. There was talk in a couple of places that Campbell could be the third best player in the draft, but everyone is scared to draft goalies because of the development time and the current win with a random goalie fad that will almost certainly pass. If Campbell is going to be the best player, then this is the right pick for the organization.

by tyrith on Jun 25, 2010 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think thats the path Joe is taking.

He has publicly stated numerous times that the Stars focus is on winning now. If they were rebuilding Brad Richards (and probably several others) would be gone. They appear to be stuck in neutral.

by Josh Lile on Jun 25, 2010 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about Halak?

Montreal sure was quick to get rid of their #1 championship caliber goalie.

by CrackerJap on Jun 26, 2010 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think they know Halak

was just hot at the moment. They were smart enough to not want to pay the big bucks for him. The team that does is going to be losing a lot of money.

by Tsudbury on Jun 26, 2010 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not a terrible pick

And some one was going to grab him in the first round.

But I gotta admit, I am pretty shocked Dallas didn’t grab Fowler.

Sons of '67: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Jun 25, 2010 10:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Just remember…were going to need more goalies in the future to. The cupboard is getting bare in that position in the not too distant future. Like stated…we can grad a D-Man down the road, but goalie prospects are alot harder to come by of this cailber.

by k9mike on Jun 25, 2010 10:34 PM CDT reply actions  

They've got Bachman and Besko

the cupboard isn’t bare. In fact all this pick does is state that the Stars have no confidence in their goalies under contract and needed a new one. They passed on three good d-men prospects. Something they needed far more than another goalie, even if Campbell is better than those they already have.

by Hull Fan on Jun 25, 2010 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bachman will never be a starter though.

The concensus is that his ceiling is as a backup. He’s done nothing as a pro to change that opinion. Beskorowany could still be something I guess, but he’s so far away from being a useful NHLer that I think questioning his long term potential is pretty viable.

by Josh Lile on Jun 25, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but so is Turco.

Though, I guess you could argue that the heavy workload wears him down pretty significantly too.

by Josh Lile on Jun 26, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Instability in goal is a pretty bad thing. Now we have a strength. Building D from goal on out is a good thing. I think Joe will trade for a quality, experienced D yet.

by KStars on Jun 25, 2010 10:36 PM CDT reply actions  

TYPO

Was Art playing the NHL Entry Draft drinking game?

Janurary? :P

by JCWM2 on Jun 26, 2010 1:44 AM CDT reply actions  

So it seems over 60%

Have this rated as a grade B or better.

Wouldn’t know it from all the venom around here…

by Brad Gardner on Jun 26, 2010 10:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Some of us

May have voted before we cooled off.

innocent whistle

by JCWM2 on Jun 26, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Untitled_000000_small
Week of 2-13 OT Thread
Group_shot_at_old_7_club_small
Prospect Reilly Smith update
Small
How would you feel about a name change?
Me2_small
College Hockey @ AAC
Small
Bring Back Garry Glitter
Small
The Longest Yard On Ice
Sunrisebusportrait_small
Why haven't the Stars been collecting more loser points?
Small
Mark Fistric, super sub?
Small
Everyone just breathe...
Untitled_000000_small
Week of 2-6 OT Thread -- Snaps is the Name of the Game, The Name of the Game is Snaps

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Graphic Design Artist

Avatar_small RyanM