2010 NHL Trade Deadline: Pacific Division Roundup
Somehow, the 2010 NHL trade deadline was labeled as boring. There were a record 31 deals that moved 55 players and 25 draft picks, according to NHL Network. Most of the deals involved players that made me, personally, say "huh?" And most of the deals seemingly made Stars fans say words they didn't want their mothers to hear.
To the astute and well read Stars fan, the inactivity of Joe Nieuwendyk was not surprising. Dallas' two wild cards heading into the Olympic break were Marty Turco and Steve Ott. The latter was extended earlier in the week, and the former was vouched for when Alex Auld was placed on waivers, subsequently claimed on re-entry waivers by the New York Rangers. Two bullets in the gun they could have used: One allowed to walk in July for no compensation, the other signed to what some feel is a crippling deal to a team that has a heavily reported internal cash budget of $45 million dollars this year, last year, and mostly like the next.
Still, knowing all of this as most of you did, there seemed to be a line drawn in the sand (ice?) yesterday afternoon. On one side was "Come on, Joe! Time is running out!" On the other: "Let's not make a move for the sake of making a move." Anxiousness is a part of every die-hards' trade deadline day (even my own, though I did not expect movement) and the real problem throughout the day shifted more and more from what the Stars weren't doing, to what the rest of the Pacific division WAS doing.
Said Joe Nieuwendyk to the Dallas Morning News: "We would have loved to get a few draft picks, and we were certainly listening to people, but there was nothing realistic that we could get done,'' he said. ``So now we're prepared to move forward with what we have. This is sort of how we went into it. We believed we made our deals already with getting Kari Lehtonen and signing Steve Ott, so we really didn't expect much today.''
Three teams improved. One didn't have to. One sat and watched.
A wrap up of the day that was in the Pacific division awaits after the jump...

The Phoenix Coyotes:
Flashback to August of this year: The Coyotes ownership struggle is all over (and practically the only) NHL news. They might get moved, they had a really tough finish to the season, they didn't have a good summer for their roster...they were a mess.
Then, the second of two very wonderful things happened for them: Dave Tippett, recently let go by your very own Dallas Stars, replaces Wayne Gretzky as the head coach. The first very wonderful that happened for them was on November 16th, 2007 when the Anaheim stupid Ducks placed Ilya Bryzgalov on waivers. Their entire fortune stems mostly from that day. I'm not bitter, though.
So this destitute franchise, seemingly flailing around like a fish out of water, somehow gets it's act together, lowers it's GAA dramatically, and finds themselves in a position to be buyers (NHL sponsored) at the trade deadline, in pursuit of home ice advantage in at least the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs. Sports is funny like that.
The Coyotes were the big winners of the trade deadline. They get:
And the shattered remains of Mathieu Schneider, who, depending on who you read, they might actually try to use as a point man on their power play. Really?
They gave up:
Peter Mueller, Kevin Porter, Sean Zimmerman, Anders Eriksson, and two 4th round picks.
Which is to say, essentially one roster player and some picks that may or may not be worth anything. Peter Mueller was in need of a change of scenery anyway. Wojtek Wolsky, believe it or not, actually brings some needed playoff experience to the Coyotes (15 games or so) and some scoring punch they desperately need to keep their place in the WCF standings.
This is all interesting from a Stars perspective because it's an attempt to do what the Stars might need to do sooner rather than later: Make the playoffs and have some success in an attempt to retain and build the fan base. Hockey needs winning in these locals to survive. Winning is what made Dallas what it is. The Coyotes know they have to win to put butts in the seats.
The Los Angeles Kings:
The Kings, fresh off a whipping of the Dallas Stars in Texas, decided to shore up their third and fourth lines a little. They added depth players in former Star Jeff Halpern, and winger Fredrik Modin.
They add:
They give up:
Teddy Purcell, and a third round draft pick for Halpern. For Modin, only a conditional draft pick.
The Kings didn't make themselves markedly better, but they demonstrated last night why they didn't have to. Solid goaltending from Quick and a fast team with top end, very young talent will probably see them skate into the dance for the first time in a long time.
The problem the Stars face is this: They're (the Kings) only going to get better with time.
The Anaheim Ducks:
The Ducks got much better on paper, and could easily leapfrog Dallas in the playoff race. More importantly, they brought an old nemesis back to the division, and he's signed up for a few more years (at a pretty high cap number too).
That man is former L.A. King, Lubomir Vishnovsky: Star Killer Extraordinaire.
Anaheim Gets:
And a sixth round pick.
They give up:
Ryan Whitney, Vesa Toskala, Justin Pogge, 4th, 6th, 7th round picks
Whitney, who we feared when he was traded to Anaheim, never panned out for them. He's one of these guys that a "change of scenery" might do wonders for. Sad thing is, he's going to Edmonton. So unless Art buys a beer for the poor guy, I don't think he's going to like much he sees up there.
Anaheim has improved, and Vishnovsky will be there for some time. Six games on the Stars schedule next year (and the two years following) just got that much tougher.
The San Jose Sharks:
The Sharks are the top team in the conference. They might be the top team in the league. In the regular season.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems to be the mantra here, and who could blame them?
The real question they have to be asking themselves is 'Which team just made the move that spells our doom?"
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
"Trade Deadline Day" Overblown
I’m proud of Joe for standing pat, especially after deciding wisely to sign Ott and to waive Auld and go with Lehtonen and Truco in net (in that order please). It is rediculous how fans get all fired up about “Trade Deadline Day”. Part of this is the media’s fault. There is all this special dedicated coverage as if it’s Draft Day or something. It’s a DEADLINE people! It’s not a DESIGNATED trade day! I think Brian Burke said it best yesterday. He said if major deals need to be done in March, then you screwed up in the front office last off-season! There is no magic fairy dust that can be prinkled over a team on TDD and make them jugernauts.
We have aquired a potential top 10 young goalie, resigned one of the best aggetators with skill in the league, and added a tough “in front of the net” role player like Segal. Nice job Joe! And he did all this BEFORE Trade Deadline Day! It could be said he turned his assignment early to the teacher. :)
No problems with how we did.
I can buy that we did what we wanted before the deadline. It remains to be seen how the teams making moves will make out. Seems like a lot of trade day moves kind of fizzle, at least the first year.
Of course the elephant in the room remains the same as a year ago. Where do we find a top pair D man?
That's more like a Dinosaur!
And that MUST be addressed in offseason.
by 5PointPuckism on Mar 4, 2010 9:42 AM CST up reply actions
Assuming that Joe ever wakes up and figures out that D *is* one of, if not the, major problems with this team
So far, his public comments don’t leave me with a lot of confidence
I think he knows
But he can’t do anything about it. The money situation is to frakked up.
by Brad Gardner on Mar 4, 2010 10:11 AM CST up reply actions
Then Why spend money on Ott?
Come on Brad, we’ve talked about this. Ott is a nice player. Most everyone likes him but he wasn’t “necessary.” If keeping Ott means you have to trade Ribeiro to get defense (money out for money in) how can anyone call this a good deal for the Stars?
Or just as bad if you pay Ott 3 million but don’t want to play Neal 4 million and he signs a reasonable offer sheet have you improved your team?
Defense is the problem and the Stars have yet to address it.
We call it a good deal
Because it was. We paid at or below market value for Ott. He brings both tangible and intangible production that VERY few players in the NHL bring as a package. Your skill guys are too pretty or scared to mix it up and your goons have no skill…he has a little of both. Plus he ignites this team..he’s worth it.
And you are in the minority….again…tell’s ya something?
by 5PointPuckism on Mar 4, 2010 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
No
his deal was not below market or at it. The Stars gave Avery too much last year. He’s not worth 4 million. The Stars gave too much to Ott because he’s not worth 3 million. Comparable players:
Jarko Ruutu – 1.3 million
Chris Neil – 2 million
Alex Burrows – 2 million
David Backes – 2.5 million (and I’m not sure they’re comparable at all)
Sean Avery – 3.4 million
So you screw up with Avery and repeat that mistake with Ott. Why would a guy who’s never put up 50 total points nor scored 20 goals in a season “deserve” 3 million? 3rd line players get 2ish million. Ott got 3 and it will cost this team another/better player being traded out to fix the problem that is the defense. Its too much and the Stars didn’t improve their team. How is this a “good” deal?
i'm pretty sure we all would have liked to see
some sort of package involving daley and niskanen for a better defensemen, but it wasn’t realistic. i’m okay with not making moves.
it just comes down to playing well. if we play to our potential, we’ll make the playoffs. yet for some reason this team has the hardest time in the world doing so. i just don’t get it.
Hope he knows what he's doing
because not picking up any defense at all is no good. I like that we resigned Ott (although for way too much), but keeping Marty is high risk. Defense wins championships, and if we don’t start trading for or aquiring blue liners in the offseason and start drafting more intelligently (Scott Glennie isn’t what we need IMO) then we can’t make any progress. Hicks needs to sell the team to someone who cares so we can spend to the cap like all good teams do, so we can put players on the ice that can actually play.
"That can actually play"?
I assume you are limiting this comment to defense. Because this team as solid talent up front.
You know
If the Stars don’t make the playoffs and the Blackhawks get eliminated before they reach the Cup Finals, I’m rooting for Phoenix.
Why?
@walsha If Phoenix wins the Stanley Cup, does Gary Bettman present the Cup to Gary Bettman?
Only in Bettmans fantasys
Bet he has a little Colishaw type foil cup replica he holds over his head after shaving in the morning.















