Wisniewski Gets 2 Minutes, Robidas Gets 5 and the Game?
Last night I happened upon my television at the exact right time to see the now famous, horrendous hit Wisniewski decided (and I mean premeditated) to put on Brent Seabrook as a little retribution for a hit Seabrook had made just seconds earlier.
Knowing, of course, as we all do, the latest NHL news and goings-ons, I waited for him to be thrown out of the game. I waited. And I waited.
He was given two minutes for charging.
Everyone understands the tremendous speed with which things happen on the ice and how hard it is to be an NHL referee, but seriously? Two minutes for charging? Do the confines of the NHL rule book not allow for further action by the on ice officials there?
And what the hell was Anaheim broadcaster Brian Hawyard thinking? That and the Robidas video after the jump...
Is the new rule put forth by the general managers insufficient in it's language to punish a hit like this?
When you watch the Robidas hit on Clowe that got him 5 minutes for boarding and a game misconduct, you can't help but wonder what the NHL is trying to convey with these calls. It sounds like they're saying that if you so much as touch someone from behind, it's a heinous, dangerous crime. If you take a run at someone from the front and make contact with their head, that's only worth 2 minutes?
To compare the two hits and the in-game punishments is maddening. The officials must be given more latitude to make common sense decisions on the ice in these cases.
Luckily the post-game punishments are most likely (cross your fingers?) going to rectify the situation, however belated it might be. Still, that the Ducks got to finish the game with their d-man and the Stars (and Blackhawks) did not is puzzling.
Were the circumstances and outcomes a little different, we could easily be talking about the effect this disparity had on a close playoff race. The Ducks and the Stars are both too far gone this time, however.
And finally, go to YouTube or over to Puck Daddy and watch the longer version of the Anaheim broadcast where color guy Brian Hayward actually suggests that Seabrook was swooning just to buy a call. Unbelievable.
Knowing the way they do things at The Honda Center, I guess it's just lucky that Wisniewski wasn't awarded one of the stars of the game.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ok first off that hit deserved more than 2 minutes and he should def. be suspended a couple of games for that. Its crap like that that needs to be out of the game.
secondly, is that play by play man an idiot?
born to destroy
There's a consensus "yes"
On the idiot part across the internet this morning.
by Brad Gardner on Mar 18, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
I haven't really looked, bc I don't know if I want to see it
But I have a feeling it’s something like “Well what about Seabrooks hit on Perry??”
by Brad Gardner on Mar 18, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
These calls are so uneven and it sucks. We don’t really know what to expect everytime there’s a questionable hit anymore.
The thing that really bugs me is that Robidas is a respected player throughout the league and it was just a hockey play. Wisniewski on the other hand isn’t exactly an angel and he was trying to injure Seabrook.
On Brian Hayward, the man has a classic case of homer-itis. Tragically, it’s chronic.
Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.
by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Mar 18, 2010 12:04 PM CDT reply actions
i'm okay with robidas' punishment
he did hit him pretty squarely in the back. but he really couldn’t have hit him elsewhere once he committed to the hit because clowe immediately turned his back when the puck came. if he gets his hands up to protect himself, we wouldn’t even be talking about this. it is what it is.
i still don’t understand what ovechkin gets 2-games for. hit the guy on the shoulder when he was on his edge. unfortunate. i think they have to give him something to protect the defensemen, which i’m okay with as well.
what i don’t get it is this retaliation bullshit charge by wisneiwski. perry got hit clean, and then he takes a very dangerous run at seabrook. he should get multiple games for that.
and what i REALLY don’t get is how guys are getting away with this head hunting, like cooke and richards. those two guys should of both gotten 20 games in my mind. most blatant intent to injury i’ve seen in a while.
we’re all confused, but hits to the head do need to go, but in a way that doesn’t take hitting out of the game. you should just be severely punished when you take someone out like cooke did with that chicken sh*t.
and why can't players retaliate
the old fashion way. by yourself. going out, the next shift, and laying a clean, hard hit on a player. that’s what you learn in youth. not to head hunt like these garbage dirt bag cheap shot artists. this league needs to get rid of head hunting. i rather watch the league’s best players play good solid hockey than all of this crap.
This tipped me over the edge as far as thinking somebody needs to get fired.
Preferably Colin Campbell.
There is something inherently wrong with the league here. Wisnewski’s hit was despicable, but it shouldn’t have even had a chance to happen because Seabrook should’ve been whistled for the headshot on Perry in the first place….it’s maddening to me that as the headshot controversy ramps up, so do the questionable hits.
"It would've been a huge momentum boost if we had beaten the St. Mary's School for the Blessed, Blind, Deaf and Dumb."
Hockey nut since the night of 5/2/08. What a night it was.
DefendingBigD
Twitter: PatIVERSEN
It is pretty incredible
That these things keep happening, even with all the increased attention from every which way.
Clowe for Interference?
The unfortunate thing about all this is that the decent players who just made a mistake are getting punished just as harshly (or more harshly) than the ones who are obviously head-hunting. Why do the refs and NHL have such a hard time differentiating between the two?
Something I keep noticing, players now-a-days continually put themselves in a position to be hurt (Clowe). The puck is moving along the boards and he uses his body to shield Robidas from getting to the puck. How is that not interference? I do agree that Robidas should not have hit him and should have made more of an attempt to go after the puck (then it truly could have been interference). I do think Robidas should have gotten a double minor or 5min penalty, but nothing more. It seems like more and more players are using this move (shielding) and then get a penalty called when they get hit.
And for the hit on Seabrook, Wisnewski should be suspended the rest of the year. That was clearly an intentional head hit. anytime both elbows and gloves go first into the face of the opposing player…duh!
Good.
"It would've been a huge momentum boost if we had beaten the St. Mary's School for the Blessed, Blind, Deaf and Dumb."
Hockey nut since the night of 5/2/08. What a night it was.
DefendingBigD
Twitter: PatIVERSEN
I had no problems with the Robidas call
He hit in the back, it resulted in a nasty cut.
And when you injure somebody with an illegal hit, you ought to own the consequences.
Which brings me to the Wisniewski hit. And yes, Pat is correct in that if the officials had called an elbowing penalty on Seabiscuit to begin with, none of the crap that Wisniewski pulled would have happened.
That having been said, Wisniewski still owns his actions, which were clearly illegal since the puck wasn’t anywhere near Seabrook. And since he injured him with an illegal hit, he owns the consequences as well.
The NBA allows it’s refs to go to replay to review flagrant foul calls. It’s time the NHL put wide screen video monitors down at ice level for the officials to review similar plays, as well as goals.
Also, while the Ducks are represented by some of their best fans here on SBNation (Earl, Arthur, and the other guys from Anaheim Calling), their entire organization comes off as a bunch of jackasses for suggesting Wisniewski did nothing wrong.
I realize it’s almost Standard Operating Procedure for coaches to back their players no matter their transgressions.
Afterall, Ken Hitchcock said that Derian Hatcher’s jaw breaking hit on JR deserved nothing more than a two minute minor.
Still, don’t insult our intelligence, you morons.






















