Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Phil Mickelson Outshines Tiger Woods

Why the Tippett firing was Joe Nieuwendyk's first good move

Fire Tippett + Hire Crawford = Nieuwy's first good move?

Ok hear me out on this Stars fans... Take a deep breath then exhale. I know reaction has been swift and harsh over the last 24 hours to the latest news but it's now time to let the shock dissipate and look at the bigger picture.

I'm here to tell ya that everything is gonna be alright. 

Yes, the firing of Dave Tippett has kinda caught everyone off guard and most seem to think it wasn't justified. I will also grant you that hiring Marc Crawford doesn't exactly look great on paper when you consider that over the last three seasons he's coached, he has gathered a record of 101 wins, 116 losses and 29 overtime losses with zero playoff appearances. Marc is also almost a complete 180 degree spin in coaching style and mannerisms compared to that of Tipp and that too has fans worried.

But hey, at least it's not Craig MacTavish they hired right? 

See? I got you to smile a little just there. After the jump I'll explain why this coaching change isn't so bad after all.

Star-divide

First a little story...

Over this past weekend I was asked for my thoughts on the upcoming NHL draft and just what the Stars would be looking to get with their 8th pick overall. My reply to that person was: "It depends on what style of play Joe Nieuwendyk wants to see the Stars use, the draft may be the first true indication of what type of team Joe wants to put together."

I got a funny look from that person as if to ask what exactly did I mean 'what kind of team Joe wants to put together?'  Wasn't Joe just going to carry on the tradition of we have all come to know over the last 15 seasons as "Dallas Stars hockey (Trademark, All Rights Reserved, Copyright Dallas Stars Hockey Club)" and stick with what has worked for the most part in the past? Tough, tight checking defense backed by all-star caliber goaltending and an opportunistic offense. The thing is though the hiring of Nieuwendyk is a pretty big departure for this organization.

Let's flashback over the recent history of the Dallas Stars for further explanation...

Bob Gainey was the Stars GM from 1992 until 2002 and we all know what his team philosophy is and what kind of club he turned the Stars into under his leadership. He left in 2002 and was replaced by Doug Armstrong who had been Gainey's assistant, so of course he's now learned what it takes to build a winning team from Gainey and  applied those same values with his own managing. Les Jackson and Brett Hull come along in 2007 and while Brett was kinda new and a blank canvas to this whole thing, Jackson was the experienced one and for whom did Jackson serve as an assistant too for so many years to gain that experience?  Both Bob Gainey and Doug Armstrong! 

It isn't hard to see how the Stars GM tree has branched out over the last 15 seasons.

But that brings us now to Nieuwendyk, who other than being a mere employee under Gainey and Armstrong isn't a part of that tree.  His mentors were not Bob and Doug so their influence on his GMing decisions may not even register on the radar! Joe is more likely to be "What Would Burke and Fletcher Do?" than "What Would Gainey and Armstrong Do?"

(Ok, I know I probably just scared some more people by linking Joe to Brian Burke... Hell, I even kinda scared myself just now writing it, but stay with me here and don't panic yet!)

This brings us to Marc Crawford...

Marc you could easily argue is the anti-Tippett. He's fiery and emotional. He's meticulous in how things are done on his team and players either step in line or get out of the way. He may in fact frustrate his own players at times, but lets get real here for a moment and get off this "players won't play for him" shtick that seems to be thrown in his direction already. The players will play for him because his methods have worked before, he has a Cup ring to prove it and because in the end the players are in fact professionals.

He also has a different philosophy in terms of how the game should be played compared to that of Dave Tippett. Marc was kinda vague in Thursday's press conference about what kind of play we'll see from his Stars come fall, but I think it's safe to say he won't be aiming to grind out 1-0 and 2-1 wins that coach Tippett would have been fine with.  A Marc Crawford coached team will take more chances offensively with the puck. Overall team speed is going to be used more prominently as it's a key to his system's success. Defensemen are going to be asked to move the puck quicker up the ice and wingers are going to be asked to create chances for their centers.

All of these changes are a departure from what we have seen from the Stars in years past, and that's exactly why Nieuwendyk brought Crawford in. It's not that Tippett is a bad coach, quite the opposite actually. It's just that Joe's vision for the Dallas Stars is better served with Crawford being the guy leading it behind the bench.

Fans wondered why a guy like Guy Carboneau wasn't given a shot at coaching the Stars, but Carbo himself is part of that Gainey defense-first mold if not a direct 'branch' from the Gainey tree so to speak.  Not to say that Carboneau can't be a good coach elsewhere in the NHL, he just wasn't going to be able to fit into Nieuwendyk's plan.

When the Stars slumped to begin the 2008-09 season, a lot of fans wondered if the slight change in GM philosophy with Brett Hull in the mix and wanting more team offense didn't clash with how the team was originally built and more importantly, Dave Tippett's game plan.  The problems of course turned out to be a lot more than just that simple issue, but the thought had crossed a lot of people's minds.  Now with a completely new face and way of thinking sitting in the Stars GM chair, the chances that clash with Tippett was going to happen was now even greater, so Nieuwendyk did the right thing. Even if it seems like this change wasn't needed, it really was.

That's what this is about and why it's a solid first move. Joe brings in a guy like Crawford, who can see and agree with his vision and carry it out the wants Joe want's it to be done.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

good move?

I’d have a lot more confidence in that argument if anyone but teams with the highest end talent had won with what is perceived to be Neiwy’s style. If that is what was going on in FL, TOR, VAN and LA, I’d say it wasn’t working for them. Yes, it appears to work in DET and PIT, but do we have that talent level?

Having said that, is the thinking, if we post the exact same results as the last 6 years, but wins are now 5-3 and losses perhaps 3-5 vs 2-1 and 1-2, will that put more butts in the seats?

by MiteMom on Jun 12, 2009 6:49 AM CDT reply actions  

I think Dallas talent-level wise is much closer to a Detroit or Pittsburgh situation than they are Florida or LA so that part doesn’t worry me. I think we kinda saw last season that if we allowed the Stars to open up, they could be a very explosive offensive team… The problem of course was they allowed as many goals as they got so maybe in that respect Marc can get the team to play with that same offensiveness, but with a smarter mindset and commitment to defense and backchecking.

by Art Middleton on Jun 13, 2009 2:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Try it on for size

I really do think this could work. And firing Tippett was not an easy decision to make for anyone involved, so I’m willing to bet they really believe in what they’re doing in the front office. We’ll see how it pays off. Then again, I was willing to give Avery a shot, and look what happened…

Anyway, @ MiteMom, I’d say we do have the talent to pull of this type of game. In fact, I think the team we’ve got now is geared for that style of play more so than old-school Stars Hockey. Ribs, Neal, Brunnstrom, Eriksson, Richards… we’ve got players that are taking offensive risks and take the fight to the other side of the rink. Of course, we still need to plug some defensive gaps still (especially if we don’t have Zubie as much).
In this case with Stars coaching, sometimes I think you need a different captain for a different ship.

by tdawg88 on Jun 12, 2009 10:03 AM CDT reply actions  

??????????

I am going to refrain from making an opinion on this situation until I can see how the team looks and reacts during training camp. It has always puzzled me why teams are so willing to take a coach that has been rejected by so many other teams especially one that doesn’t have a winning record. And then there is the dark Bertuzzi cloud still hanging around. That has never been resolved and possibly will never be but I have my opinions on the subject. So, the jury is still out and I think this change was conceived before Joe was ever introduced as the new GM.

MiteMom – This team has much talent and remember that the Wings are aging. That appears to be a lot of the reason the Pens took them. The Pens simply ran the Wings ragged until they began to run out of that old Red Wing steam. That is what the Wings have done to their opponents in the past so now we should try that against them. The Stars DO have the talent AND the potential to do just what the Pens did tonight, if they can stay healthy. I so hope that Gustavsson will choose to come to Dallas and then we will have just about all the pieces of the puzzle intact. Either Marty will play like the elite goalie that he is supposed to be or Gustavsson can take the spot.

by StarsRule on Jun 12, 2009 10:58 PM CDT reply actions  

I Think I can Answer the First Part

Crawford coached an LA team that was put together by Dean Lombardi.

And I’m not that fond of Lombardi’s…uhh…abilities as a GM.

Defending Big D | TheStarsFans | But a Hawks fan since 1989

by Brandon Bibb on Jun 13, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Untitled_000000_small
Week of 2-13 OT Thread
Group_shot_at_old_7_club_small
Prospect Reilly Smith update
Small
How would you feel about a name change?
Me2_small
College Hockey @ AAC
Small
Bring Back Garry Glitter
Small
The Longest Yard On Ice
Sunrisebusportrait_small
Why haven't the Stars been collecting more loser points?
Small
Mark Fistric, super sub?
Small
Everyone just breathe...
Untitled_000000_small
Week of 2-6 OT Thread -- Snaps is the Name of the Game, The Name of the Game is Snaps

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Sb_avatar_small Brad Gardner

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Hullring_small Cole Jones

198849_alds_rangers_rays_baseball_small Josh Lile

Me2_small Taylor Baird

Erin_and_kevin_at_rangers_small Erin Bolen

Contributors

Small starshorns

Pic_2011-02_small scm83x

Graphic Design Artist

Avatar_small RyanM