Steve Ott suspended
Mike Heika is reporting that Steve Ott has been suspended:
I just got off the phone with Stars co-GM Les Jackson and he said Steve Ott has been suspended pending a review Monday for his match penalty at the end of Saturday's 4-3 loss to the Ducks.
He goes on to say that perhaps the reason for the suspension wasn't necessarily because of the (incidental) eye gouging, but more because of the fact he was throwing punches with a cast on his hand. Rule 47:15 states:
Any player of goalkeeper wearing tape or any other material on his hands (below the wrist) who cuts or injures an opponent during an altercation will receive a match penalty in addition to any other penalties imposed, including fighting.
So let me get this straight. Steve Ott is involved in some, admittedly, rough action in front of the net as the last seconds wind down. J.S. Giguere then comes up behind Ott, trips him and swings at his head (with stick and blocker in hand). Ott fights back against Giguere which draws the ire of Travis Moen. Moen proceeds to pin Ott against the boards, laying out punches against him.
Yet Ott fights back and because he has a cast on, he's suspended? Guess he was just supposed to let Moen pound on him with out raising a hand in retaliation. If you watch the video, Ott was doing all he could to hold off Moen who was swinging freely at Ott, landing a bunch of blows to his face. Perhaps the incident occurred once both players were on the ice.
[UPDATE] After contemplating this for a bit, this suspension kinda makes sense. Anytime a match penalty is given to a player it immediately goes under for review by the league. Match penalties are also mainly given for intent to injure. So the league needs to review the play and determine what sort of punishment should be given. However, these reviews don't just happen overnight, especially on a weekend (I guess) and the league suspended Ott until they could at least put together a formal review.
Is it fair? Not really. But does it make sense? Sort of. What I think is the biggest injustice is how Ott was found to be most at fault by the ref's on ice when it was clear he was ganged up on.
It will definitely be interesting to hear what the league's reasoning on this one is.
Even worse was how Ott had to face the Ducks alone. Sure, any other Stars stepping in would have been hit with a suspension too most likely, but come on. Dave Tippett agrees:
"I saw five of their guys jumping on one of ours, which is disappointing to see one guy having to fight all five of their's."
Here's the YouTube video, so make your own conclusions.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
That's BS...
Isn’t there also rules to hand out match penalties if you’re the second person into a fight? We’ve definitely been hit by that penalty multiple times in recent memory.
I say the fight initially started as Giguere vs Ott. Moen, Pronger, and Niedermayer all then jump Ott. Moen initially squares off against him while Pronger is still throwing him against the boards. I count at least 3 Ducks involved more than just extraneously. Especially since Giguere got a roughing penalty out of the action too.
Stars in a Texas Night Sky, a Dallas Stars blog from a fan's perspective.
by rangers85 on Feb 28, 2009 9:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Of course...
The guys over at Battle of Cali see it a completely different way.
Ahh.yes. Ducks fans. Gotta love ’em.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Feb 28, 2009 9:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe It's Just Me
But when I read that quote from Tippett, I don’t think he’s so much criticizing the Match Penalty as he is wondering where the hell the other five Stars skaters were during that brouhaha.
And as I mentioned in the comments section over at BoC, I get why the Match Penalty was called on Ott. Yes, he got jumped and was forced to drop the gloves out of self preservation. But he did throw some punches. I think if he had just tried to tie up Moen (since the gutless linesmen didn’t seem too terribly interested in helping out) in an effort to defend himself, he wouldn’t have gotten the Match Penalty.
Here’s the issue I have.
Daley got an instigator for doing the same thing Moen did to Ott. And Moen been given an instigator, he would have been automatically suspended for the Ducks next game.
Mind you, I think the instigator is one of the worst rules in hockey. And it’s obvious Ott started the whole thing from the beginning and, as Craid Ludwig said in the post game, pretty much brought all that on himself.
But we don’t play by those rules. We’re supposed to play by the instigator rules that in place now whether we like it or not. And today, the refs and the NHL selectively chose to ignore those rules but enforce another.
All your bench Sydor are belong to us TheStarsFans
by Brandon Bibb on Feb 28, 2009 10:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I guess I have a lot to learn about hockey
because it appeared to me that their goalie decided he didn’t like the way Ott was massaging their defensemans’ back and decided to hack his legs with his Jedi goalie stick. Thats where the shizz started so why is it on the Dallas player? The goalie started it.
by Benthere on Mar 1, 2009 1:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
ummm...
looked like it was quite a bit more than a “massage”. the game was essentially over and ott was giving quite a rough “massage” to niedermayer’s arm/shoulder. no reason for that nonsense. he got what he deserved. i’m sure you would feel the same exact way if you were not a stars fan.
by beezer345 on Mar 1, 2009 9:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Please...
Look, I really can’t find fault with the Ducks players but it’s not like Ott laid out Niedermayer with a cross check in the back. It was some rough stuff that wasn’t really called for, but did it deserve the ire of the entire Ducks team? No way.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Mar 1, 2009 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess the refs saw it as all legal
Until Ott took Moen to the ice and started pounding away on him. Of course, I disagree with that but I assume that is how they saw it. They should have jumped in, knowing that Ott couldn’t fight back. I don’t think you can blame this situation on anyone except the refs who mishandled the situation.
by hiafex on Mar 1, 2009 1:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The guys in the stripes
Didn’t have a good day, that’s for sure.
And they capped it off by doing nothing to break up the fight.
All your bench Sydor are belong to us TheStarsFans
by Brandon Bibb on Mar 1, 2009 7:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















