Steve Ott Suspended Two Games
Sources have informed Defending Big D (and Bob Sturm of The Ticket is reporting this as well) that Steve Ott has been suspended two games for his transgressions on Saturday night.
[Update: The DMN is reporting that the suspension is for the hip check on Colaiacovo.]
Steve Ott was involved in two on-ice incidents on Saturday night against the St. Louis Blues when he committed two questionable hits in the second and third period. The first, a hip check on Carl Colaiacovo, led to a near-brawl between Blues and Stars players, however Ott was not penalized for the hit. The second was a knee on knee hit on B.J. Crombeen, which led to a fight with Crombeen being assessed an instigator penalty, as well as a fighting major. In my opinion the hit on Crombeen was much worse and much more dangerous, but apparently the NHL felt differently.
Follow the jump for further thoughts on the suspension.
First, here is Mike Heika's take:
The NHL has not released its reasoning, and it generally does not take questions on its suspensions, so they will probably simply explain that Ott is a repeat offender and that the check was dangerous.
I disagree, but what do I know.
The frustrating thing about the NHL's supplementary discipline is that it appeared to me that Ott's hit last March on Gregory Campbell was more worthy of a suspension than this one. He received no suspension for that hit. It also appears that Rob Scuderi's hip check on Jason Chimera was much worse, and Scuderi (who has no previous suspension history) was only fined.
Maybe that was considered in this suspension. Who knows.
We've covered Steve Ott extensively this week on Defending Big D and I'm not going to rehash everything I've been saying for the past two days. But here's the bottom line:
Steve Ott toes the line between agitation and insanity. Stars fans love the edge he brings to the team, but at the same time he needs to find ways to hold himself back. He's much more valuable to this team when he's on the ice and not when he's suspended or hurt. Ott is now a three-time offender in the eyes of the NHL; any more questionable or dirty hits and he could be looking at a very lengthy suspension.
That being said, the fact that Ott was suspended for just the hip check is ridiculous and proves just how inconsistent the NHL is when doling out punishments. Rob Scuderi lays out a much more devastating type of hit and only receives a fine; perhaps the suspension has more to do with Ott's past and reputation.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Well
That’s not completely unreasonable.
by Brad Gardner on Oct 27, 2009 10:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ruutu gets 3 games for a very dirty hit
Ott gets 2.
But Scuderi’s hit was lower and looked a LOT worse
nothing. (Ok, a fine)
by Taloncarde on Oct 27, 2009 10:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
From what Sturm and Brandon were saying, it was for his cumulative actions Saturday night. I mentioned that the only problem I could foresee anyone having with the hip check was that it came about 1 second after Colaiacovo let go of the puck.
The knee on knee looked bad, looked like it was avoidable, and like it or not, there’s less margin for error for a player like Ott than there is for Scuderi.
That all having been said, Scuderi should have been suspended, his past be damned.
by Brandon Bibb on Oct 27, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I showed the 3 videos to one of the guys I work with, a non-hockey fan. As I played the videos, I told him the # of games suspended, and they seemed fair to him. After the Scuderi hit, he was shocked to there was no suspension.
I agree the knee on knee could have been avoided, but I didn’t see anything else he did during that game suspension worthy.
Oh well, it’s a mess. Ott just needs to keep his nose clean and let people come after him, and let Barch be the goon for a while :P
by Taloncarde on Oct 27, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well...
it could have been a LOT worse..it is, after all, Stevie we’re talking about…
We just need him to really learn where that line is. He’s too important to the team (and other team fans be damned) for us to lose him especially for something avoidable.
**Proof SOME rules are meant to be broken**
by PNLTBX on Oct 27, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well,
He deserves it. I don’t think Ott ever tries to hurt anyone, just the way he plays puts himself and others in harms way. Yeah, I know no one was seriously hurt, but they could of been. He needs to learn where to draw the line. He is a huge part of this team and their success. He can be a really good player, he just does stupid things, and that will hurt a team more than help it.
by Kent K on Oct 27, 2009 11:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So he’s out for the games at home (where we’ve not been good) with Toronto and Florida? Can’t say I’m surprised but I also think Scuderi should’ve gotten more than just a fine.
by Happy Girl on Oct 27, 2009 12:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Can't say I'm too surprised
at the punishment handed out. It’s more than I would have liked (obviously), but I don’t think it’s extreme given the circumstances.
I love what Ott does, but I found myself wondering if he was heading to the box or involved in penalty calls a little too much during that game. Don’t forget about the slashing incident at the faceoff circle too. Anyone know what that was about?
He’s normally spot on, but it was just a bit too much that night. He needs to be able to agitate from the ice, not from the penalty box, or, for the next 2 games, the press box.
by Tsudbury on Oct 27, 2009 12:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We really need Ott
For him to be out two games on a hip check I think is unreasonable…
"Clearly, the season is over. Fire Daniels, fire Washington, fire Maddux, burn down TBIA." - AJM
by aggierangerfan00 on Oct 27, 2009 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Colin Campbell talking about Scuderi's hit on Chimera and comparing him to Kyle McLaren and Rob Blake
“He does hit guys with a hip check,” Campbell said of Scuderi. “Rob Blake’s name came up and Kyle McLaren’s, but they hit guys with their rear ends and they hit them in the hips and they hit them hard … [not] low.”
You mean like how Ott hit Colaiacovo?
Double standard much, Colin?
by Brandon Bibb on Oct 27, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And he must have missed the hit by Scuderi, that was LOW
by Taloncarde on Oct 27, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scuderi could have been starting a sit spin he was so low…
**Proof SOME rules are meant to be broken**
by PNLTBX on Oct 27, 2009 2:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good take Brandon. I definitely agree that the Crombeen hit was much worse, and that Scuderi needed to be punished as well. This is definitely a reputation call.
I think that as a rule it’s bush league to hit low when skating forward. Hip checks should always be executed skating backwards, leading with your backside. When you skate forward at a guy and drop your shoulder to their thighs and knees it’s extremely dangerous. But as long as the NHL deems these hit legal (i.e. doesn’t explicitly prohibit them) then I don’t know how they can punish Ott for this one. I didn’t think this hit was as low as either his hit on Taylor Pyatt or the similar hit he threw in Boston. The one against the Blues looked worse because Colaiacovo tried to jump the check, but it wasn’t any lower than lots of those similar hits (did Tucker get suspended for his hit on Peca? I honestly don’t recall). Any punishment Ott got should have been because of the Crombeen hit, but I can’t say I’m surprised. NHL discipline is a joke.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
by Fehr and Balanced on Oct 27, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















