Defending Big D: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Stargazing: Dallas 0, Boston 3

Stargazing is a daily assortment of Dallas Stars  and Texas Stars news, and whatever other random ramblings are bouncing around inside our heads.

The Dallas Stars got totally and completely dominated by the Boston Bruins on Friday night. There's no other way to say it.

The Bruins were superior in nearly every single statistical category. Faceoffs. Blocked shots. Shots on goal. Penalty Kill. Power Play. Faceoffs. Hits. Giveaways. Faceoffs. Did I mention faceoffs?

Statistics don't even begin to tell the story of that game. Rather, I think the game is a story of a Dallas team who thought they were high and mighty after beating the Pismo Beach Panthers (Nashville Predators) 6-0 on Wednesday, and figured they would handle the Bruins at home on Friday. After all, they're the only team that hasn't lost in regulation, right? Not any more.

They came out flatter than flat. They had no pop. No zing. No heart, and no passion. In short, they played like last years Dallas Stars. And while it's only one game out of six we've seen so far, last year is the reason why everyone has such a short fuse around here. We remember last year all too well, and we're afraid, even after just one bad performance, that the same attitude and habits will return this year. Let's take a breath and see what happens on Monday. Don't worry about tonight. Oh no. Don't worry about that. We'll talk about that a little later today.


Dallas_stars_news_and_notes_medium

Let's talk about this some more, shall we?

Brad Richards sums it up quite nicely, though, we wonder how hard it would have been to figure this out beforehand:

"No disrespect to Nashville," center Brad Richards said, "but that game was not a good indication of what this was going to be. This was a whole different animal."

After the jump, the autopsy continues...

Star-divide

Dbd-sm_medium

NHL.com gets the facts pretty straight here:

"We were pressuring them while still being under control," Thomas said. "We had 20 guys working together to accomplish the same goal. In the third period, instead of chasing another (goal), our guys were finishing off the game."

Thomas played well, but most of the shots he faced were from long distance.

"He even said he didn't have many tough saves," Julien said. "There were a lot of shots from outside, and the guys cleared the shots away from the net."

Long distance indeed.

Dbd-sm_medium

Marc Crawford offers up his views on why those shots were so anemic:

"I thought that tonight we were guilty of going to the easy areas a little bit too much," Crawford added. "A team like Boston will do that - they’ll spread you out, push you to the outside. They will give you the corner areas in the offensive zone, but let’s face it, the goals are scored in the high-traffic areas in front of the net."

In the building, I kept a close watch on Marc Crawford tonight. I thought I would see him rip into his guys pretty good. He didn't. He kept his cool (for the most part), which is more than I can say for many on the other side of the glass. Is this a game where you wanted to see him keep his cool?

Dbd-sm_medium

As always, Mike Heika is on the scene trying to make some sense of that mess:

"They took momentum after the bad penalty I took," Ribeiro said. "We were chasing because we got behind so early. They were on the road, they scored first, and they took momentum. It was just a bad reaction on my part. It's not a penalty I should take."

Maybe so, but the Bruins were better for a lot more reasons than just one power-play goal.

"You take penalties, that shouldn't kill you," Crawford said.

No, the Bruins' attack was one of effort, of intelligence and of teamwork. Players worked together, supported each other and operated as a unit. That left the Stars chasing the play and coming apart at times.

"We were expending all of our energy just trying to get the puck out of our own zone or doing everything we could just to get off the ice," Richards said. "We just turned pucks over and lost the battles."

 

If you had told me before the game, as good as they've been 5-on-5 this season, that they would take only one minor penalty, I would have told you that the Stars would win this game.

Dbd-sm_medium

And as always, don't forget our own observations and rantings here on Defending Big D.com. Wrote Brandon last night...

The Stars were once again atrocious on faceoffs. It's starting to become almost humorous at this point. At this point, it almost has to be the players that are the issue and not the coaching. This is a trend that started last season and is getting out of hand at this point.

Those crisp passes and chances created off the forecheck we saw just two nights ago? Gone. In fact the Stars lost nearly every single individual puck battle all night long. Is there a theme starting to develop here?

While I don't really* doubt the faceoff stats from last night's game, I wonder at how they possibly could have been that close. (Stars won 42%). Brandon is right. The more they seemed to lose (including the first 8 of the game I think) the more it became a joke. They looked like a joke last night.

Dbd-sm_medium

And finally, I'm reminded of something one of the most despicable humans on the planet said once after a loss...

"Just flush it down the toilet and move on."

-Kobe Bryant (yuck)

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think the poster

needs to refrain from the scalded earth type comments that he thinks the coach should give to the team and come up with a little more analysis than they “looked bad”.
Did one of the top lines or defensive pairs set the tone in a negative way? Did the goaltending fail at key points?
Grousing and dwelling on lack of effort provides no insight.

by mcgee48c on Oct 17, 2009 6:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

To be fair...

These ‘Stargazing’ posts are not much about analysis, and more about seeing what others are saying about the Stars.

And after last night’s game, there really wasn’t much to say. It was a complete and total breakdown in all aspects of the game, and the Stars were outclassed in every area.

Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.

by Brandon Worley on Oct 17, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We can go to the DMN

boards if we want emotional, nobody’s trying posts. I would hope you aspire that anything other than GDT’s should have little bit of insight than that. Otherwise, this place on the Interwebs is completely redundant and adds very little.
How about, the Ribero line was not up to par the other night against Boston, allowing Boston to zero in on the Richards line. This along with the effect of a whole 3rd line being scratched left the Stars with little going for them that night.
I know thats not as dramatic as the Stars were outclassed, but it gives a little better description of what was going than they ‘stunk". Even if you don’t agree with my off the cuff analysis of the why.
I think that blogs concerning sports like hockey (a sport that doesn’t really attempt to use metrics other than counting stats) fall prey to the emotional post with no insight. I’m not advocating the development of metrics. Its just that in their absense there’s no reason to deduce that there are no reasons that a team peaks and valleys in performance other than ‘not trying’.

by mcgee48c on Oct 18, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant to say

little better insight than that.

by mcgee48c on Oct 18, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I appreciate your comments..

But I wonder how much of our site you have read. We combine in-depth analysis along with a round up of the quotes and coverage from other sites as well. We don’t have access to the Stars for quotes, that kind of thing, so that’s what these “Stargazing” post are for. NOT for analysis.

But if you want analysis, I suggest you see some of our articles from last week:

Analyzing the Dallas Stars Penalty Kill

Film Review: Marty Turco and the Dallas Stars Defense.

But I tell you what, I’ll see if we do more for you.

Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.

by Brandon Worley on Oct 18, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, its your blog

so its gonna be ok however you want to roll. I’m saying that the ’they’re just not trying’ type of post doesn’t provide any insight since, most of the time, a true lack of effort as the main factor in a loss is rare. Emotional, knee jerk reactions are expected in the GDT, but not after a little time for reflection.
I know of and appreciate the analytical posts.
I know I’m sounding much more critical than I really feel.

by mcgee48c on Oct 18, 2009 7:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Dallas Stars website. We talk Stars hockey 24/7/365. You're welcome to join in the discussion; please follow the code of conduct for commentary.
Start posting about the Stars »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kari Lehtonen
Profile_pic_small
**SPOILERS** LOST Ep 6.01 Discussion
Small
The Lost Season
Dos-xx-beer-baby_small
Time for Fistric to get his due?
Twitterme_small
Warren Peters Sent Down to Texas Stars
Profile_pic_small
LOST Season 6 Precursor Discussion Thread
Twitterme_small
Tom Wandell Out for Year
Belfour20_small
Falling Stars - What If The Stars Didn't Win The Cup?
Osuhockey5_small
So many leads...
Joeyavatar_small
Petr Sykora

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Profile_pic_small Brandon Worley

Staff Writers

Twitterme_small Brandon Bibb

Sb_avatar_small Brad G

Photo_10_small Derek B

Irbe_hockey_card_small Art_M

Don_small Mike Russo

AHL Correspondent

Gtalk_profile_small scm83x

Graphic Design Artist

Avatar_small RyanM